VOGONS


Bought these (retro) hardware today

Topic actions

Reply 59960 of 59970, by myne

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

It's simple economics.
They were maybe 10% of all motherboard sales for the roughly 1 year period they existed as the only AMD option.
~August 1999 slot A
~June 2000 socket A
Only 10% of those people are the kind who are inclined to tinker/upgrade.

1% of 1 year's sales might want to buy one.

I built:
Convert old ASUS ASC boardviews to KICAD PCB!
Re: A comprehensive guide to install and play MechWarrior 2 on new versions on Windows.
Dos+Windows 3.11+tcp+vbe_svga auto-install iso template
Script to backup Win9x\ME drivers from a working install
Re: The thing no one asked for: KICAD 440bx reference schematic

Reply 59961 of 59970, by Nexxen

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
myne wrote on Today, 07:52:
It's simple economics. They were maybe 10% of all motherboard sales for the roughly 1 year period they existed as the only AMD o […]
Show full quote

It's simple economics.
They were maybe 10% of all motherboard sales for the roughly 1 year period they existed as the only AMD option.
~August 1999 slot A
~June 2000 socket A
Only 10% of those people are the kind who are inclined to tinker/upgrade.

1% of 1 year's sales might want to buy one.

My uncle bought a Slot-A system, K7-500, because it was cheaper than Intel. His idea was to upgrade when prices for cpus would have come down.
But he ended up going for P-4 for his wife and he got a socket A 1.4GHz + SDR.

PC#1 Pentium 233 MMX - 98SE
PC#2 PIII-1Ghz - 98SE/W2K

- "One hates the specialty unobtainium parts, the other laughs in greed listing them under a ridiculous price" - kotel studios
- Bare metal ist krieg.

Reply 59962 of 59970, by H3nrik V!

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
Trashbytes wrote on Today, 07:19:
H3nrik V! wrote on Today, 05:46:
As I recall (and understand), more or less, yes. Maybe some pull-up or pull-down resistors. […]
Show full quote
myne wrote on Today, 04:09:
Isn't goldfinger essentially just a jumper block? I don't recall anything particularly special about it […]
Show full quote

Isn't goldfinger essentially just a jumper block?
I don't recall anything particularly special about it

Ghetto version = 2xN jumper, squish together onto fingers, and jump wires.
No?

As I recall (and understand), more or less, yes. Maybe some pull-up or pull-down resistors.

Honestly, I don't think AMD locked down overclocking of the Slot-A Athlon - on the contrary, there was an option, as opposed to Intel's cpus.

The lack of a kind of slotket for Slot-A is probably more due to the short-livedness of the platform compared to Slot-1 and thus no BIOS or VRM support etc. After all, Intel had like 4 or 5 chipsets released with Slor-1 boards?

Edit: https://www.cpu-world.com/forum/viewtopic.php … ight=goldfinger it seems that indeed it is a very simple device ..

Locked down in the sense that you needed the extra stuff to make it happen on Slot A which really did stop casual overclocking from people who had no clue unlike say the Socket 370 and Socket 7 boards where you could do it right out of the box with nothing gatekeeping it.

I agree that Slot A was rather short lived and that was likely the biggest reason for no slotkets.

Wouldn't FSB overclocking be just as easy as it was on Slot-1 and BX chipset, if the board supported it?

If it's dual it's kind of cool ... 😎

--- GA586DX --- P2B-DS --- BP6 ---

Please use the "quote" option if asking questions to what I write - it will really up the chances of me noticing 😀

Reply 59963 of 59970, by Trashbytes

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
H3nrik V! wrote on Today, 10:11:
Trashbytes wrote on Today, 07:19:
H3nrik V! wrote on Today, 05:46:
As I recall (and understand), more or less, yes. Maybe some pull-up or pull-down resistors. […]
Show full quote

As I recall (and understand), more or less, yes. Maybe some pull-up or pull-down resistors.

Honestly, I don't think AMD locked down overclocking of the Slot-A Athlon - on the contrary, there was an option, as opposed to Intel's cpus.

The lack of a kind of slotket for Slot-A is probably more due to the short-livedness of the platform compared to Slot-1 and thus no BIOS or VRM support etc. After all, Intel had like 4 or 5 chipsets released with Slor-1 boards?

Edit: https://www.cpu-world.com/forum/viewtopic.php … ight=goldfinger it seems that indeed it is a very simple device ..

Locked down in the sense that you needed the extra stuff to make it happen on Slot A which really did stop casual overclocking from people who had no clue unlike say the Socket 370 and Socket 7 boards where you could do it right out of the box with nothing gatekeeping it.

I agree that Slot A was rather short lived and that was likely the biggest reason for no slotkets.

Wouldn't FSB overclocking be just as easy as it was on Slot-1 and BX chipset, if the board supported it?

If the board and bios supported changing FSB then I doubt it would be any more difficult than Intel, I seem to remember that not all Slot A boards allowed changing FSB but I'm likely wrong about that.

I do know that changing FSB on Slot A impacted the Cache which was either half or full FSB so changing the FSB could lead to instability due to the cache even if the CPU could handle the change.

AI is inevitable, there is nothing you can do to stop it, no Ironman snap to save you from the Basilisk.

Reply 59964 of 59970, by Nexxen

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
H3nrik V! wrote on Today, 10:11:
Trashbytes wrote on Today, 07:19:
H3nrik V! wrote on Today, 05:46:
As I recall (and understand), more or less, yes. Maybe some pull-up or pull-down resistors. […]
Show full quote

As I recall (and understand), more or less, yes. Maybe some pull-up or pull-down resistors.

Honestly, I don't think AMD locked down overclocking of the Slot-A Athlon - on the contrary, there was an option, as opposed to Intel's cpus.

The lack of a kind of slotket for Slot-A is probably more due to the short-livedness of the platform compared to Slot-1 and thus no BIOS or VRM support etc. After all, Intel had like 4 or 5 chipsets released with Slor-1 boards?

Edit: https://www.cpu-world.com/forum/viewtopic.php … ight=goldfinger it seems that indeed it is a very simple device ..

Locked down in the sense that you needed the extra stuff to make it happen on Slot A which really did stop casual overclocking from people who had no clue unlike say the Socket 370 and Socket 7 boards where you could do it right out of the box with nothing gatekeeping it.

I agree that Slot A was rather short lived and that was likely the biggest reason for no slotkets.

Wouldn't FSB overclocking be just as easy as it was on Slot-1 and BX chipset, if the board supported it?

Someone here recreated a better version of the goldfinger, sporting all fancy stuff that wasn't present on the 1st ver of that tool.

AMD K7 "goldfinger" cloning thread

PC#1 Pentium 233 MMX - 98SE
PC#2 PIII-1Ghz - 98SE/W2K

- "One hates the specialty unobtainium parts, the other laughs in greed listing them under a ridiculous price" - kotel studios
- Bare metal ist krieg.

Reply 59965 of 59970, by Trashbytes

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
Nexxen wrote on Today, 10:45:
H3nrik V! wrote on Today, 10:11:
Trashbytes wrote on Today, 07:19:

Locked down in the sense that you needed the extra stuff to make it happen on Slot A which really did stop casual overclocking from people who had no clue unlike say the Socket 370 and Socket 7 boards where you could do it right out of the box with nothing gatekeeping it.

I agree that Slot A was rather short lived and that was likely the biggest reason for no slotkets.

Wouldn't FSB overclocking be just as easy as it was on Slot-1 and BX chipset, if the board supported it?

Someone here recreated a better version of the goldfinger, sporting all fancy stuff that wasn't present on the 1st ver of that tool.

AMD K7 "goldfinger" cloning thread

Not seen that thread before, looks like all the design files are there ..might look into making a couple if I can get the parts locally at a reasonable cost.

AI is inevitable, there is nothing you can do to stop it, no Ironman snap to save you from the Basilisk.

Reply 59966 of 59970, by Nexxen

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
Trashbytes wrote on Today, 10:57:
Nexxen wrote on Today, 10:45:
H3nrik V! wrote on Today, 10:11:

Wouldn't FSB overclocking be just as easy as it was on Slot-1 and BX chipset, if the board supported it?

Someone here recreated a better version of the goldfinger, sporting all fancy stuff that wasn't present on the 1st ver of that tool.

AMD K7 "goldfinger" cloning thread

Not seen that thread before, looks like all the design files are there ..might look into making a couple if I can get the parts locally at a reasonable cost.

Beware, opening the cartridges isn't an easy task. If you use metal tools you'll damage the plastic case.
There are YT videos for how-to, watch those beforehand. It involves some serious cursing 😀
Been there, "wept" that. 🤣

PC#1 Pentium 233 MMX - 98SE
PC#2 PIII-1Ghz - 98SE/W2K

- "One hates the specialty unobtainium parts, the other laughs in greed listing them under a ridiculous price" - kotel studios
- Bare metal ist krieg.

Reply 59967 of 59970, by BitWrangler

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

I wanna think that a quarter century ago, you'd think it the most devious and difficult plastic case ever. But in 2026 if you've used the intervening years to crack open tablets, phones, laptop battery packs, recent laptops, etc etc it would seem like cake. Though the plastic ain't getting any younger, so make sure you're not doing it very cold.

Unicorn herding operations are proceeding, but all the totes of hens teeth and barrels of rocking horse poop give them plenty of hiding spots.

Reply 59968 of 59970, by supercordo

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
oldGPU wrote on Yesterday, 14:10:

A few more this week! 😀

VideoLogic Apocalypse 3Dx (PowerVR PCX2)

The attachment VideoLogic_VideoLogic_Apocalypse_3Dx_4MB_PCI.jpg is no longer available

Where did you find the VideoLogic Apocalypse ????

Reply 59969 of 59970, by Nexxen

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
Linoleum wrote on Yesterday, 19:53:

I scored a very nice haul totally for free. Got a few drives and a very clean beige box with an Asus Slot A K7M motherboard and Athlon 800. After changing the faulty PSU and reflashing the BIOS, everything was working perfectly... It's crazy how much they go for on eBay!! I just had to slap in a nice Creative TNT2, Creative 52x and SB Live! I had laying around and I now have a perfect 1999 system.

Tested the 2 5.25"?

PC#1 Pentium 233 MMX - 98SE
PC#2 PIII-1Ghz - 98SE/W2K

- "One hates the specialty unobtainium parts, the other laughs in greed listing them under a ridiculous price" - kotel studios
- Bare metal ist krieg.

Reply 59970 of 59970, by Linoleum

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
Nexxen wrote on Today, 13:47:
Linoleum wrote on Yesterday, 19:53:

I scored a very nice haul totally for free. Got a few drives and a very clean beige box with an Asus Slot A K7M motherboard and Athlon 800. After changing the faulty PSU and reflashing the BIOS, everything was working perfectly... It's crazy how much they go for on eBay!! I just had to slap in a nice Creative TNT2, Creative 52x and SB Live! I had laying around and I now have a perfect 1999 system.

Tested the 2 5.25"?

Yup, both working! But one of them was weirdly set as D0 and D2 at the same time with 2 jumpers... When I first plugged it I could feel something warm and smell something burning... No harms were done after removing one of the jumper.

The only things non-working were that PSU that might need to repair to a burned trace close to cap that leaked and the 40x cdrom that had a seized motor.

P3 866, V3, SB Audigy2
P2 400, TNT, V2, SB Audigy2 ZS
P233 MMX, Mystique220, V1, AWE64
P166, S3 Virge, SB32, PicoGus
486DX4 100, CLGD5424, SB32
Prolinea 4/50, ET4000, SB16
SC386SX 25, TVGA8900D, Audician32
286 10, ATI VGA, Forte16
PS2 30/286, SBP