VOGONS


Reply 20 of 21, by mkarcher

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
kingcake wrote on 2026-11-12, 23:54:

So there is some performance benefit to 168-pin EDO? I had (wrongly) assumed it was a simple reorg for the newer bus.

I don't expect standard PC chipsets to implement /OE control for EDO, so likely you won't see any performance benefit. Any design that has both PS/2 and DIMM slots has to cope with /OE-less SIMMs in the PS/2 slots. The /OE pin on EDO DIMMs is probably only used in special-purpose designs that are not meant to be compatible with PS/2 SIMMs.

In PC mainboards, I expect /OE on the EDO DIMM socket to be permanently grounded (at least in EDO mode, didn't check SDRAM mode), effectively operating EDO RAMs the same way as they work on PS/2 SIMMs.

Reply 21 of 21, by RayeR

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

OK, I though that OE# is needed to Hi-Z inactive bank during interleaving but as output can be controlled via RAS#/CAS# then seems not needed...

Gigabyte GA-P67-DS3-B3, Core i7-2600K @4,5GHz, 8GB DDR3, 128GB SSD, GTX970(GF7900GT), SB Audigy + YMF724F + DreamBlaster combo + LPC2ISA