VOGONS


Is this method valid?

Topic actions

First post, by Sadist boar

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

File system:

*+-D:\
*+-progra~1\
*+-DOSbox\
*+-Machine\
*+-cdrom\
*--win3\
*--disk\
*+-floppy\
*--3.5\
*--5.25\

configuration:

[AUTOEXEC]
mount a machine\floppy\3.5 -t floppy
mount b machine\floppy\5.25 -t floppy
mount c machine\disk
mount d machine\cdrom\win3 -t cdrom
imgmount e machine\cdrom\xcom3mus.iso -t iso
c:
87_vc4~1\vc.com

Is this a valid method?
vc.com is Volkov Commander - a Norton Commander clone I use.

Last edited by Sadist boar on 2010-05-22, 21:13. Edited 2 times in total.

Sad fat people are never good at using complex programs.

Reply 1 of 11, by Sadist boar

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

If several different machines are emulated, each can have a structure like the "machine" directory. so for a Tandy machine it's

mount c tandy\disk

Sad fat people are never good at using complex programs.

Reply 2 of 11, by Sadist boar

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Is this method of sorting the mounting folders/images valid? This is a question for DOSbox experts. |:(|

Sad fat people are never good at using complex programs.

Reply 3 of 11, by Qbix

User metadata
Rank DOSBox Author
Rank
DOSBox Author

what is there expert on ?
there is nothing complicated with it.
If it works for you then use it.

Water flows down the stream
How to ask questions the smart way!

Reply 4 of 11, by Sadist boar

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

And... is it a good idea to show the "folder structure" the way I did in this thread?

Sad fat people are never good at using complex programs.

Reply 5 of 11, by ADDiCT

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

The only really bad idea you had is to post nonsense like this.

Reply 6 of 11, by Sadist boar

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Nonsense? I was asking if this idea is any good - idea of sorting mounted images/folders in that manner. first "code" holds the attempt to show a folder tree (like in a file manager).

Sad fat people are never good at using complex programs.

Reply 7 of 11, by SKARDAVNELNATE

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

It's valid if it accomplishes what you set out to do. However you're making it overly complicated for yourself.

This is what I do:

C:\DOS
C:\DOS\A
C:\DOS\GAMES

[autoexec]
# Lines in this section will be run at startup.
# You can put your MOUNT lines here.
# CONFIG -set "cpu cycles=max"
# MOUNT A C:\DOS\A -t floppy
# IMGMOUNT A "C:\DOS\A\<disk>.img" -t floppy
# MOUNT C C:\DOS\GAMES -t dir -freesize 400
# MOUNT D D:\ -t cdrom
# IMGMOUNT D "C:\DOS\<disc.iso>" -t iso

Also, why not "mount d machine\cdrom -t cdrom"?
What does win3 add to your plans?

is it a good idea to show the "folder structure" the way I did in this thread?

It's not too dificult to understand. However it might become a challenging to line up visually showing which folder is in which.

Reply 8 of 11, by Sadist boar

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

why not mount "cdrom" as a CD? The "cdrom" is a folder to store images such as x-com 3 music, windows 3.11 RUS WRK, or images needed to fool some games that beg for a CD on startup.

Sad fat people are never good at using complex programs.

Reply 9 of 11, by SKARDAVNELNATE

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
Sadist boar wrote:

The "cdrom" is a folder to store images

I see that from your imgmount line. I asked what purpose the win3 folder has that it needs to be mounted as D.

Reply 10 of 11, by Sadist boar

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

win3 is mounted as D: because the Windows 3.11 RUS WRK came as a plain RAR of cd-rom content, not as an image or a pre-installed build.

Sad fat people are never good at using complex programs.

Reply 11 of 11, by ADDiCT

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

*Sigh* Is there any point to this thread? Besides, the "discussion" is drifting in a direction that's not appreciated on VOGONS. Windows 3.x came on floppies or a CD-ROM where I live. I've never heard of it being distributed as a "plain RAR of cd-rom content".

I think this answer would wrap up this thread nicely: organize your mounts and files the way you want or need it. There is no "best practice" or "fixed", preferred way of organizing your stuff.