New scaler algo (kopf/Lischinski) \ VOGONS

New scaler algo (kopf/Lischinski)

Topic actions

Post a reply

First post, by krom

Posted on 2011-06-06, 22:59

krom Offline

Rank Newbie

Rank: Newbie
Posts: 6
Joined: 2010-06-05, 14:25

Hello everyone,

I love scaler effects (HQnx in particular : HQ2x : different versions ? )

I just want to say that two scientists kopf and Lischinski have created a very interesting new scaler algo :
http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/kopf/pixelart/
http://dropdo.com/2Rm/Depixelizing%20%20Pixel%20%20Art
http://www.pcworld.com/article/228729/algorit … r_graphics.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2Fd-4NzB0w

I hope there will be some implementations soon that could be easily integrated in Dosbox 😀

Reply 1 of 7, by Dominus

Posted on 2011-06-07, 02:19

Dominus Offline

Rank DOSBox Moderator

Rank: DOSBox Moderator
Posts: 9147
Joined: 2002-10-03, 09:54
Location: Ludwigsburg

Right now this scaler is not practical as it is only for stills and not for real time scaling. Afaik someone IS working on doing it real time but expect CPU usage to be very high

Windows 3.1x guide for DOSBox
60 seconds guide to DOSBox
DOSBox SVN snapshot for macOS (10.4-11.x ppc/intel 32/64bit) notarized for gatekeeper

Reply 2 of 7, by Freddo

Posted on 2011-06-07, 15:27

Freddo Offline

Rank Oldbie

Rank: Oldbie
Posts: 583
Joined: 2003-10-29, 21:56
Location: Sweden

Dominus wrote:
Right now this scaler is not practical as it is only for stills and not for real time scaling.

Indeed. According to the Results in the paper, it got a median of 0.62s per frame. Needless to say, DOSBox would be very slow with it, and totally unplayable.

Reply 3 of 7, by kekko

Posted on 2011-06-07, 16:59

kekko Offline

Rank Oldbie

Rank: Oldbie
Posts: 501
Joined: 2004-03-24, 18:56

well, the scaler might be offloaded on another thread, or written with a shader so it can run on the gpu...

Reply 4 of 7, by VileR

Posted on 2011-06-08, 03:58

VileR Offline

Rank l33t

Rank: l33t
Posts: 2155
Joined: 2003-05-14, 22:11
Location: 1-01-80 0:00a

Microsoft has its name on it - good luck trying to use it in something like DOSBox (even if it was fast enough for realtime)....

it does look pretty damn good though!

Reply 5 of 7, by h-a-l-9000

Posted on 2011-06-09, 18:48

h-a-l-9000 Offline

Rank DOSBox Author

Rank: DOSBox Author
Posts: 4511
Joined: 2005-02-23, 00:14

Some of the more complex ones don't look that good

1+1=10

Reply 6 of 7, by Miki Maus

Posted on 2011-06-09, 18:53

Miki Maus Offline

Rank Member

Rank: Member
Posts: 197
Joined: 2004-10-18, 22:19
Location: Cave

The only problem I see is that there are no sharp corners in the resulting images.

Reply 7 of 7, by kolano

Posted on 2011-06-09, 20:19

kolano Offline

Rank Oldbie

Rank: Oldbie
Posts: 523
Joined: 2010-12-26, 21:03

I'm a bit annoyed by the comparison shots. For HQ4x it looks like they applied the filter once and then scaled up the image by 4x rather than reapplying the HQ4x to get a 16x increase.

Eyecandy: Turn your computer into an expensive lava lamp.

Go to top of page Go to top of page

Back to DOSBox General

Main menu

Common searches