VOGONS


First post, by Kahenraz

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

A fresh install of Windows 3.11 for Workgroups yields "codepage=936" in the SYSTEM.INI. However, 936 is supposed to be the Chinese codepage instead of the English (American) codepage of 437.

Does anyone know why this is?

Reply 1 of 13, by Jorpho

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Are you using American installation disks?

Reply 2 of 13, by Kahenraz

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Yes I am. Everything is in English and setup identifies the codepage as English (American) but the number used is 937.

Reply 3 of 13, by Jorpho

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

I mean, are you using genuine original Windows disks that originated within North America? (It's important to rule these things out.)

Also, are you installing in DOSBox or something else?

Reply 4 of 13, by NJRoadfan

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

My definitely from the USA copy of WFW3.11 reads:

codepage=437
woafont.fon=English (437)

So something is up with your copy.

Reply 5 of 13, by Kahenraz

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

This is a digital copy of Windows 3.11 for Workgroups I've had for a long time. All of the files on all of the disks read: "11/11/1993 3:11:00 AM". Installed on a fresh copy of Windows 7.1 which was set to code page 437 at installation.

I'll reinstall again to confirm.

Reply 6 of 13, by Jorpho

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
Kahenraz wrote:

This is a digital copy of Windows 3.11 for Workgroups I've had for a long time. All of the files on all of the disks read: "11/11/1993 3:11:00 AM".

What makes you think your "digital copy" couldn't have originated from China?

Reply 7 of 13, by Dominus

User metadata
Rank DOSBox Moderator
Rank
DOSBox Moderator

Should we close this? (Not that I can) digital copy... Yeah...
Also still no answer whether this is with dosbox or something else...

Windows 3.1x guide for DOSBox
60 seconds guide to DOSBox
DOSBox SVN snapshot for macOS (10.4-11.x ppc/intel 32/64bit) notarized for gatekeeper

Reply 8 of 13, by ratfink

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

I thought Windows was analogue back then.

Reply 9 of 13, by mr_bigmouth_502

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

He could have gotten it from an MSFN subscription. 😉

Reply 10 of 13, by swaaye

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Windows 3.1 should be made available on GOG and Steam. 😁

Reply 11 of 13, by TheMAN

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
ratfink wrote:

I thought Windows was analogue back then.

yeah, didn't it come on cassette tapes?

Reply 12 of 13, by mr_bigmouth_502

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
swaaye wrote:

Windows 3.1 should be made available on GOG and Steam. 😁

Hell yeah! While they're at it they should do Win95 as well, so that the VM authors will finally get off their collective asses and develop decent support for Win9x games.

Reply 13 of 13, by sliderider

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
TheMAN wrote:
ratfink wrote:

I thought Windows was analogue back then.

yeah, didn't it come on cassette tapes?

Punch cards and paper tape. 🤣

Photo of Windows 1.0 Beta 🤣

500003057-03-01?$re-story-hero$