First post, by carlostex
- Rank
- l33t
I've been using ATX PSU's forever in my vintage system builds, as i like how cool and silent they are.
But i've been wondering how suitable are these for replacing old AT PSU's, specially because ATX dropped -5V since ATX 2.x . I know that this isn't a major problem, but since i wanted to use sound cards that require -5V every now and then i bought 2 ATX V1.3 PSU's.
For my SS7 system, i use an LC-Power LC6550GP2 ATX V2.2. This PSU has the following ratings:
3.3V = 35A
5V = 40A
12v1 = 16A
12v2 = 18A
It lacks the -5V rail but this system won't need one as i didn't plan to use this requirement anyway. My guess is that i don't have lack of power in any rail here. AFAIK, on the Super Socket 7 period, CPU and Motherboard were mostly powered via 3.3V and 5V rails. I've got 40A on 5V and 35A on 3.3V. I believe this is more than enough for a Super Socket 7 system, even if i decide to use the most power hungry Socket 7 CPU. Which is not even the case, as i'm using the extremely low power AMD K6-III+. So no worries here.
For my older systems though i bought LC-Power LC-420H-12. These have the -5V rail. Specs:
3.3V = 16A
5V = 16A
12V = 15A
-5V = 500mA
Now 3.3V is irrelevant here as the AT power connectors don't take 3.3V directly on the board, unless you have the P10 connector on-board. On my 386 system this PSU behaves very well, always runs cool. My guess is that it has more than enough power for this system without a sweat.
But i'm building a 486 right now on a cool AT case i have, and i'm playing around with the 50MHZ FSB. The Intel 486 DX50 is working very well. And later i might try to give an AMD 5x86 a push for the magical 200MHz. This will be done with a black marking AM486DX5-133W16BGC, manufactered in late 1999.
I'm wondering if 16A is enough on a 486 system. All of my old AT PSU's have 20A on the 5V rail. My guess is that 16A should be enough, but this is an issue that all of us vogoners should keep in mind for our vintage builds. Thoughts?




