Guys we are NOT adding more benchmarks. The ship has sailed so to speak...
In regards to CPU benchmarks like Sysinfo, Landmark and others. I find that they scale poorly (Sysinfo craps out quickly on faster CPUs) and / or have inconsistent results, especially with non-Intel CPUs. I think most of the benchmarks we have in the suite scale really well (I mean come on, from a 386 to an i7). 3Dbench 2 is unfortunate, however it is a very popular and precise benchmark with slower machines. Once we have more data it won't be hard to find a cut-off point, which at the moment seems to be at a P3-800, definitely not a slouch.
Also the majority of people coming to VOGONS are interesting in playing old games not AutoCad or Eagle.
We are making good progress, hopefully reaching 200 entries soon.
@ Stiletto Will fix January typo when I get to it 😀 New charts out by Monday.
@Elinda and Racoonrider You have "unstable" for Quake. Any chance you can fix this? Only 3 entries have this. Might just interpolate the results.
@ Elinda Did your scores on the AMD K6 improve after using SetK6D? I'm back to using an Intel MMX in my time-machine but this interests me.
@all Please avoid using , instead of . for decimal points
Please put OC results in the overclocked page. OC is overclocking of CPU clock or FSB (chipset overclocking).
@ Vulturius76 Please double check your CPU clocks and multiplier. The scores should be higher. Also did Intel have a 486DX2-80?