VOGONS

Physical/digital bottleneck

Topic actions

First post, by dosquest

Posted on 
User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

I know this all comes down to the hardware that dosbox runs on but, how much faster would an ISO image of a game that boots off the cd be than running it natively on native hardware? Take for example, dosbox playing at full CPU speed (which is what, a pIII 800mhz?) anyway, would playing a game on a comparable system, pIII 800mhzl 52x cd-rom compared to loading the ISO image in dosbox gain any real speed advantages?

Doom isn't just a game, it's an apocalypse survival simulator.

Reply 2 of 4, by leileilol

Posted on 
User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Physical CD-ROM drive access, old computer or new, will always be slower to access than reading images...because there ain't no speed limits or long spinup times.

apsosig.png
long live PCem
FUCK "AI"

Reply 3 of 4, by dosquest

Posted on 
User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Thanks for confirming that. 😀 Sorry if my question made no sense, but leil got it. Ok so basically reading the (legally) ripped ISO off of a realitivly new (in the last 10 years) HD will be many many times faster than the cd drive because with a ROM drive it has to load it into ram and it is limited to the read/write speed of the laser?

Doom isn't just a game, it's an apocalypse survival simulator.

Reply 4 of 4, by Jorpho

Posted on 
User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

...What? Reading data inherently means loading data into RAM, regardless of whether it's data stored on a hard drive or data stored on a CD-ROM. But yes, reading data from a CD-ROM is slower than reading data from a hard drive. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CD-ROM#Transfer_rates .

In any case, you don't need DOSBox if you want to use an image stored on a hard drive; if you don't need CD audio, you can use SHSUCDHD, even in DOS.

Go to top of page Go to top of page
Back to DOSBox General
Close window
Close window