VOGONS


First post, by snorg

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

So I have 3 retro systems at the moment, I have been thinking about putting together a 486 vlb system like I had in college BUT I'm not overly emotionally attached to the idea. Not to mention I've been looking at prices of the 486 stuff online and they are bad. If I could do the whole thing plus case for $75, it wouldn't be a problem but I don't see that happening. If I try to put up an ad on craigslist, I will get all kinds of crap and be drowning in PC parts.

I don't want to get rid of the Tandy, I have one 486 but it is kind of an oddball system since it has no optical drive and is very limited, it can only hold a floppy and compact flash HD and that is it. I also have my P-Pro 200, that probably makes the most sense to continue with since it was state of the art towards the mid to tail end of my college years (memory is hazy) so if I have to have a system from that rough era, then something that I already have that I don't have to spend a fortune on parts for is probably the better idea 😀 I would like to put OS/2 on it, but drivers are a concern and that also leaves out late favorite of mine from those years, Diablo. So it may end up being a Win 95 or Win 98 system. The P-Pro has ISA slots also in addition to PCI, so the entire gamut of PCI graphics cards is available to me (but no AGP).

I have an older Voodoo 3000 which is probably fine, but may pick up another video card. Not sure how much RAM it would take but would guess it maxes out at either 256 or 512MB, it currently has 64MB in 4 sockets.

Would there be any chance of running OS/2 Warp in a VM or would this system just not be beefy enough to do that? It is fine if the vm performance was around that of a 486-66 or 486-100 (not unreasonable I think as the P-Pro is much faster). I really really like OS/2 for win 3.11 and DOS apps much more than 95 or NT 4.0, it just seems so much more stable. NT 4.0 would be an option but there is no USB and it is quirky for gaming. 95 or 98 will work (leaning towards 98) but I'm not sure if my memories or bluescreens are 98 or Me based, 🤣. I've got 4 5.25" bays and 1 3.5" bay so am leaning towards using it as a system for archival/preservation.

Of course, if we're talking about emulating an OS then maybe it makes more sense to set up my dual Athlon rig. But then that is probably way too fast for certain things, and the P-Pro will likely be as well (just not as bad, and if I stick to mid 90s to late 90s I should be ok).

Thoughts?

Reply 1 of 13, by sliderider

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

An OEM 486 system is still reasonably priced compared to what you would pay for the parts to assemble it yourself.

Reply 2 of 13, by snorg

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Just in case it is not clear what I'm trying to accomplish, I thought I would clarify:

1. Consolidate some of my retro systems (perhaps get rid of the lesser 486 altogether and just keep the P-Pro, or maybe even just keep the dual Athlon (although this is less appealing, as that box has no ISA slots for older soundcards like AWE 32 or GUS

2. Have a system that is fast for mid to late 90s gaming. For really old stuff I have my Tandy, I don't care too much about the stuff that falls in the gap and for the stuff that I do care about, it either isn't speed sensitive or I'm not opposed to running it in Dos Box. The stuff that is touchy (Wing Commander or Ultima 7, looking at you here) I don't feel like setting up 2 different systems just to run those, I have no problems running them in Dos Box. So native mid to late 90s, everything else in Dos Box is acceptable.

3. Some folks will say "just run everything in DOS Box and be done with it" but I'm interested in fooling around with the AWE 32 and other classic soundcards, and also learning some graphics programming using actual hardware, not emulated. So there is that aspect.

Reply 3 of 13, by PeterLI

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Stack OEM desktops. That is what I do. Fast, cheap, always works and tons of documentations and drivers available for download online. 😀 Unless you are a tweaker of course.

Case in point: took me less than 2 hours to get Windows 3.11 & MPU-401 & SB Pro 2 & CIvNet up and running beautifully in 2 evenings (1.5 hours each) yesterday and today. I cannot imagine being able to do that sourcing a case, FPU, MOBO, VGA, FDD, HDD and so forth. Do not get my wrong: there is a lot of fun to be had with that. However: I prefer just playing games. 😀

Reply 4 of 13, by snorg

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
sliderider wrote:

An OEM 486 system is still reasonably priced compared to what you would pay for the parts to assemble it yourself.

Where to find an OEM 486 box, though? Or do you mean purchasing a complete box off E-bay? I figure it would remove the hassle of getting it to run but might not necessarily be cheaper, I've seen systems going for $200, or $300-$400 and up. There is also the matter of having to make compromises in the components, I realize I'm not going to get exactly what I want unless I spend ridiculous amounts of money, I'm fine with getting any old VLB card as long as the performance is fine, that sort of thing. Or even going PCI, if I could find a 486 board with a decent PCI implementation.

Reply 5 of 13, by snorg

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
PeterLI wrote:

Stack OEM desktops. That is what I do. Fast, cheap, always works and tons of documentations and drivers available for download online. 😀 Unless you are a tweaker of course.

Case in point: took me less than 2 hours to get Windows 3.11 & MPU-401 & SB Pro 2 & CIvNet up and running beautifully in 2 evenings (1.5 hours each) yesterday and today. I cannot imagine being able to do that sourcing a case, FPU, MOBO, VGA, FDD, HDD and so forth. Do not get my wrong: there is a lot of fun to be had with that. However: I prefer just playing games. 😀

Well, there is a certain amount of farting about I don't mind doing. But the level of farting about that I am starting to get into with the Tandy project is starting to get excessive, so I'm breaking the farting about into stages. 🤣

Since the P-Pro is already pretty close to where I want to be performance wise (ok it is at least twice as fast as a 486-133, maybe 3 times) it seems like that is a better leaping off point. It is also functioning and in a case (although a not particularly nice looking one).

I'm just worried if I start hunting for a VLB system or start speccing one out, I'm going to go off the deep end in terms of $$. I am not trying to replicate a specific system I had at all costs, I just don't think it would be possible and my pockets aren't deep enough.

Reply 6 of 13, by Tetrium

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
snorg wrote:
sliderider wrote:

An OEM 486 system is still reasonably priced compared to what you would pay for the parts to assemble it yourself.

Where to find an OEM 486 box, though? Or do you mean purchasing a complete box off E-bay? I figure it would remove the hassle of getting it to run but might not necessarily be cheaper, I've seen systems going for $200, or $300-$400 and up. There is also the matter of having to make compromises in the components, I realize I'm not going to get exactly what I want unless I spend ridiculous amounts of money, I'm fine with getting any old VLB card as long as the performance is fine, that sort of thing. Or even going PCI, if I could find a 486 board with a decent PCI implementation.

I bought a complete 486 in AT tower locally in a thrift store just a couple weeks ago. It was only 10 euro's.
I was very lucky, but I have been lucky before.

One potential problem with buying a complete 486 though is that you can't be sure the system will work. It could have a battery leaking onto the motherboard, having killed the motherboard and then you need to find a replacement motherboard which of course is some proprietary motherboard.

Personally I really favor putting things together myself, but seeing the prices of 486 parts I can fully understand why an OEM system might be the better choice these days.

Whats missing in your collections?
My retro rigs (old topic)
Interesting Vogons threads (links to Vogonswiki)
Report spammers here!

Reply 7 of 13, by snorg

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

That's just it, I tend to not be very lucky when checking thrift stores. I could buy a complete system easily enough but I can't seem to find any VLB or PCI systems, and if you want the highest performing 486 out there, you've got to go that route. So yeah I guess I'm getting a little "tweaky" just not planning on getting crazy with it.

Reply 8 of 13, by bristlehog

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

I recently found a beautiful VLB desktop in deep Moscow outskirts: Advanced Logic Research Flyer VL. It's a 486 DX2-50 system with one VLB slot on a riser (WD SVGA video is embedded). Good build quality and quiet fans (the only loud part is WD 210 Mb Caviar drive). DIN keyboard and PS/2 mouse. Made in USA - there's a chance you may find something alike.

alr_scratched_pre.jpg

Last edited by bristlehog on 2014-03-05, 06:11. Edited 1 time in total.

Here you can get fantastic wallpapers created by a friend of mine: patreon.com/Unpocodrillo

Reply 9 of 13, by snorg

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Yeah, that's a nice system.

Reply 10 of 13, by ratfink

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

i think you need to map out your requirements clearly and what they mean for systems. you seem to be saying:

- keep tandy for old games

- may want ppro for os/2

- need a box to cover mid/late 90s games + it needs to have an isa slot for awe32

Maybe confirm whether the ppro can run the games you want it to, and if so then see if you can dual boot os/2 and win9x.

Personally I find the excitement of exotic os's fades pretty quickly even on new hardware - you may find just unplugging/replugging two hard drives in the ppro meets your needs [i don't know how amenable os/2 is to dual booting].

seems like the dual athlon is surplus [fwiw mine is dismantled and mothballed, wasn't all that great once i got it running]

Reply 11 of 13, by snorg

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

The only reason I'm seriously considering OS/2 is it was really good at being able to run DOS based 3d software of the time (like 3d studio) and you would also keep something going like Fractal painter in a Windows session and swap back and forth between the 2. 3d is still a hobby of mine, but I have much faster systems so this probably isn't a strict requirement, and I know the frustration I had with getting my CD-ROM to work with OS/2 back in the day and recently the troubles I had getting it running in a vm, it may be more than I want to deal with right now. OS/2 was finicky back in the day and would probably be even more so, now.

Reply 12 of 13, by PeterLI

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Use different DOS/Windows machines as the same time on the same desk for multitasking. That is what I do. 😊

Reply 13 of 13, by snorg

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
PeterLI wrote:

Use different DOS/Windows machines as the same time on the same desk for multitasking. That is what I do. 😊

Oh you're no fun 🤣. Way back I could only afford one machine. Granted, it was a barn burner at the time. Sadly, most of my computers followed the "farmers axe" life cycle: "why, I've had this axe here 40 years. Replaced the head 3 times and the handle twice".

So parts were sold off to fund other upgrades or eventually the entire machine itself. The things I do have still are only because it was too much bother to try and sell it on ebay for the return. It is too bad the older operating systems are not supported by virtual box as a host but I guess they aren't advanced enough for it? Or Oracle figured it wasn't worth the bother. Proably both. Not much you're going to be capable of virtualizing if you can only access a max of 256mb. It would be nice to run Win 95 in a vm on OS/2 though.