VOGONS


First post, by brassicGamer

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

...Microsoft decided to release Excel on the Mac rather than on PC first. This somewhat fascinating article was linked from a Slashdot article about the 30th anniversary of Microsoft Excel and describes a market landscape that seems almost inconceivable now.

Check out my blog and YouTube channel for thoughts, articles, system profiles, and tips.

Reply 1 of 6, by alexanrs

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

I recall Microsoft launching some software for iOS and Android before Windows Phone too. They are probably separate divisions with some Independence to choose what platforms to release their products to.

Reply 2 of 6, by ratfink

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Yeah I remember using Lotus Symphony at work around 1986-88 on an IBM XT or AT running DOS, and converting some long macro from Excel I found in a magazine. We didn't get Windows [at work] for another 5 years if I recall correctly, and Excel some time after that.

Reply 3 of 6, by sliderider

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

According to Pirates of Silicon Valley, Microsoft only signed on as a Mac developer so they would have access to the MacOS so they could copy it to make Windows.

Reply 4 of 6, by badmojo

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
sliderider wrote:

According to Pirates of Silicon Valley, Microsoft only signed on as a Mac developer so they would have access to the MacOS so they could copy it to make Windows.

I can't image that was the only reason they developed for Mac; that was pre-clone wars era and Apple were still considered a big player in the PC market, so MS would have wanted to hedge their bets.

Life? Don't talk to me about life.

Reply 5 of 6, by Caluser2000

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
sliderider wrote:

According to Pirates of Silicon Valley, Microsoft only signed on as a Mac developer so they would have access to the MacOS so they could copy it to make Windows.

Conspiracy theory aside it made sense to have some experience in GUI software development. A few OEM hardware vendors were behind MS to develop Windows into something more useful. From what I understand programming for Macs wasn't a task to be taken lightly either.

Early Windows prior to 95 still suffered from things like the 8.3 by file naming convention when they could have opted for virtual long file names similar to what GeoWorks did.

There's a glitch in the matrix.
A founding member of the 286 appreciation society.
Apparently 32-bit is dead and nobody likes P4s.
Of course, as always, I'm open to correction...😉

Reply 6 of 6, by brassicGamer

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
Caluser2000 wrote:

From what I understand programing for Macs wasn't a task to be taken lightly either.

Assuming they wrote in assembler, that's a while different architecture to learn. Plus, Motorola CPUs are big endian so maybe they just wanted a challenge.

Check out my blog and YouTube channel for thoughts, articles, system profiles, and tips.