VOGONS


Windows 98 SE general advise and care.

Topic actions

First post, by bytesaber

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

I am looking for advise, wisdom, suggestions, personal opinions, etc... regarding how to care for Windows 98 SE.

I have always felt that Windows 98 is fragile. At least, when comparing to XP and pretty much anything that is not MS-DOS based. I find MS-DOS alone is perfectly fine. But Windows 98 always seems to eventually develop issues that are difficult to explain and resolve. I swap in various hardware and try different drivers frequently. Eventually I break it.

I recently rebuilt a Win98 system, and this time I installed U98SESP3.EXE. It is supposed to be all of the official updates Microsoft released, in an unofficial service pack. It will not upgrade Media Player, DirectX, Internet Explorer, etc. Just the operating system updates. This allowed me to update DirectX to only version 7, as that was my interest.

Anyhow, what does everyone else do?
Do you have any ideas on how to preserve a snapshot to make a backup?

Reply 1 of 23, by dr_st

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Well, my Win98 SE box has actually been quite stable, but then again, I do not frequently test different hardware. The last time I broke it was when I installed the generic USB mass storage driver, and used a version that did not match the locale. After manually restoring certain files from the WIN98SE CD it started working again.

To make a snapshot for backup, you can use any possible third party tools - Norton (Symantec) Ghost, Acronis True Image, Clonezilla.

https://cloakedthargoid.wordpress.com/ - Random content on hardware, software, games and toys

Reply 2 of 23, by PhilsComputerLab

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Easy: Don't swap hardware and change drivers 🤣

Windows 98 is not good with that. Sorry if that's not the most helpful advice 😊

YouTube, Facebook, Website

Reply 3 of 23, by bytesaber

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

No need to be sorry. Both comments above are good advise 😀

Reply 4 of 23, by bytesaber

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Do either of you apply any Windows updates? What I found is the only way I have figured out. Does updating even matter, in regards to gaming system?

Reply 5 of 23, by PhilsComputerLab

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
bytesaber wrote:

Do either of you apply any Windows updates? What I found is the only way I have figured out. Does updating even matter, in regards to gaming system?

I never do!

I tried that unofficial SP3 once, all it did was slow down the boot time 🤣

For gaming, I do not see any need in patching Windows 98. At least I haven't come across any issues.

YouTube, Facebook, Website

Reply 6 of 23, by jesolo

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

I always install the Unofficial Windows 98SE Service Pack 2.1a, which does (under the main updates) mostly contain a combination of the official patches released by Microsoft for Windows 98SE.
After that, they diversified the subsequent unofficial service packs (from 3.0x onwards) by including fixes/patches and enhancements from later versions of Windows. Here I also feel that you are installing fixes/updates that is not required for games running on Windows 98SE.
I do, however, extract the USB stack from one of the later Unofficial Service Packs (like from version 3.2 or onwards) and install that separately in order to obtain USB support for mass storage devices.

I'm still in two minds whether I just need to update to DirectX 8.1a or to DirectX 9.0c (the last version supported for Windows 98SE), since by the time that DirectX 9.0 was released, Windows XP already hit the market and therefore most hardware and games would have been developed to make better use of Windows XP's features.
I usually update to Internet Explorer 5.5 SP2 (although, you can also update to Internet Explorer 6.0 SP1), but I wouldn't try to use any of these versions to browse the internet (most websites don't support those versions anymore anyway).

Reply 7 of 23, by bytesaber

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
PhilsComputerLab wrote:

I never do! For gaming, I do not see any need in patching Windows 98. At least I haven't come across any issues.

I have just assumed the updates from Microsoft help with bugs. But I have no real proof of that. Interesting thought.

jesolo wrote:

I always install the Unofficial Windows 98SE Service Pack 2.1a, which does (under the main updates) mostly contain a combination of the official patches released by Microsoft for Windows 98SE.
After that, they diversified the subsequent unofficial service packs (from 3.0x onwards) by including fixes/patches and enhancements from later versions of Windows. Here I also feel that you are installing fixes/updates that is not required for games running on Windows 98SE.
I do, however, extract the USB stack from one of the later Unofficial Service Packs (like from version 3.2 or onwards) and install that separately in order to obtain USB support for mass storage devices.

I just looked at as, Microsoft has finished all the work they are ever going to do on Windows 98 fixes. So I just asked myself, Where can I just get all of their work? So yes, some of those patches may have little to do with gaming. It's just an aim to get as stable of a system as I can make. I do like your approach that you explained. I did not know that I could add mass storage that easily. I should consider that.

jesolo wrote:

I'm still in two minds whether I just need to update to DirectX 8.1a or to DirectX 9.0c (the last version supported for Windows 98SE), since by the time that DirectX 9.0 was released, Windows XP already hit the market and therefore most hardware and games would have been developed to make better use of Windows XP's features.

You and I share some thinking with this. My idea has been to build a system "capped" with nice DirectX 7 card. Some information about DirectX on Wikipedia, has explained that DirectX 7 and older, is meant to be compatible with all older versions. And "it seems to me" that the time period of the geforce 2 looks to be a nice stopping point for all older DOS and Win9x hardware. A very wild time of various devices. So I made a dual boot MS-DOS 6.22 / Win98 system built with Geforce2 TI and Voodoo2, along with some sound cards that are fun from the time. AWE64, Aureal Vortex 2, and SB Live!.

I made a separate XP based system with DirectX 9.0c, which also covers DirectX 9, 8, 7. Hardware for that era fit easily as their own build outside of Win9x. At least, that's what I've done. *shrug*

Any opinions welcome if someone things this is totally way off. I'm just making this up as I go.

Reply 9 of 23, by chinny22

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

I do install IE6, DirectX 9 and Office XP. It just makes the OS feel more complete to me but don't worry about updates, mostly they patch security holes and no patching will fix that now. I can see the reasoning for keeping IE and Direct X at earlier versions on a practical level though.

Funny thing is main problem I have is windows not shutting down, even after applying the patch, one 1 PC I didn't have the problem till AFTER I applied it, That's when I stopped updating.

But yeh, 98 hates hardware changes, or changes in general, clean build is the only real way to keep things running smoothly. Even back in the day I used to do clean install at least once a year.

Reply 10 of 23, by mrau

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

iirc with windows its ok to make a backup copy after installing what you need and cleanse the filesystem once in a while to copy over the original filesystem; its pretty quick too; iirc can be done mostly with xcopy or some such;

Reply 11 of 23, by Stiletto

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Moved to Marvin.

For future reference, here are the forum descriptions, please stay on topic when you are in each one: index.php

😀

"I see a little silhouette-o of a man, Scaramouche, Scaramouche, will you
do the Fandango!" - Queen

Stiletto

Reply 13 of 23, by kaputnik

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

A few things I keep in mind and do on my W98 rigs:

* Keep the registry clean. Only install what you know you need. Do your research instead of just installing stuff to try it out, the uninstallers aren't perfect, and will leave registry entries behind in most cases. There are good registry cleaning apps, like RegSeeker, but there's always a chance those mess things up. It's better if you can avoid them completely by just keeping the registry as clean as possible from the beginning.

* Keep the hard drives defragmented. Diskeeper Workstation was my choice back in the W98 days.

* Lock the swap file size, and make sure it's not fragmented.

* Disable Active Desktop, Web Folders, etc. Also, Tweak UI is your friend when it comes to make the UI feel snappy. Disable all unnecessary animations, remove menu popup delays, etc.

Reply 14 of 23, by candle_86

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

i load the updates mainly because windows installer 2.0 is useful for some of my programs to be able to install, and you cant get the 98se version by itself anymore. But its needed for Damon tools 3.47

Reply 15 of 23, by PhilsComputerLab

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
candle_86 wrote:

i load the updates mainly because windows installer 2.0 is useful for some of my programs to be able to install, and you cant get the 98se version by itself anymore. But its needed for Damon tools 3.47

Ah, yes, that is true. I remember installing the service pack to get Daemon tools going.

YouTube, Facebook, Website

Reply 16 of 23, by firage

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Fortunately most, if not all, of this old stuff is still somewhere on their download servers despite the lack of support. Found the MSI Installer 2.0 download, too, with a little bit of digging around: http://download.microsoft.com/download/Window … US/InstMsiA.exe

My big-red-switch 486

Reply 17 of 23, by tayyare

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

I just take a ghost image of any crispy OS install, including Windows 98. What I mean by crispy is OS + all the drivers + necessary updates + all the apps/software that I can't do without. By necessary updates, actually I only mean DirectX and USB drivers (NUSB), by necessary software I mean IE, ACDsee, 7zip, treesize, Daemon tools, etc.

GA-6VTXE PIII 1.4+512MB
Geforce4 Ti 4200 64MB
Diamond Monster 3D 12MB SLI
SB AWE64 PNP+32MB
120GB IDE Samsung/80GB IDE Seagate/146GB SCSI Compaq/73GB SCSI IBM
Adaptec AHA29160
3com 3C905B-TX
Gotek+CF Reader
MSDOS 6.22+Win 3.11/95 OSR2.1/98SE/ME/2000

Reply 18 of 23, by jesolo

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

I recently discovered that the NUSB drivers (version 3.3) causes problems under Windows 98SE, particularly with my Microsoft Sidewinder Force Feedback Wheel (USB version).
As soon as I install them, then Windows no longer recognises my steering wheel.
No problems with the USB stack that comes with the Unofficial Windows 98SE Service Pack 3.x.

Reply 19 of 23, by tayyare

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

The problem with the original one is, it requires product specific drivers for each of your flash disks, card readers, or external disks. With NUSB, it is just like XP, you just plug, and it plays.

And it has no side effects for my Sidewinder Precision Pro or 3D Pro Plus (well, they are both game port devices..🤣)

GA-6VTXE PIII 1.4+512MB
Geforce4 Ti 4200 64MB
Diamond Monster 3D 12MB SLI
SB AWE64 PNP+32MB
120GB IDE Samsung/80GB IDE Seagate/146GB SCSI Compaq/73GB SCSI IBM
Adaptec AHA29160
3com 3C905B-TX
Gotek+CF Reader
MSDOS 6.22+Win 3.11/95 OSR2.1/98SE/ME/2000