VOGONS


Jerky motion

Topic actions

Reply 20 of 54, by Snover

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

That's really weird. Last I checked, all those games ran fine on this box.

Yes, it’s my fault.

Reply 21 of 54, by Unregistered

User metadata

I tried to start Warcraft 2 but it runs jerky on my PC. But the Sound works fine. The Units are RUNNING and then standing and running and standing..........

Reply 22 of 54, by Snover

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Unregistered, need more information. Can't help you with that little tidbit.

Yes, it’s my fault.

Reply 23 of 54, by Dave

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

I have a feeling Edeldeb can be right about that. Why should a new card support such old games... Hehe...

Maybe I should get some old PCI card to use for those games. 😁

Well anyway, I'll find out sooner or later when I have DOS/Win3/9x installed on this computer in a multiboot configuration. 😀

Dave

Reply 24 of 54, by Snover

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

You're not seriously going to do that!??

Yes, it’s my fault.

Reply 25 of 54, by Dave

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Which of the two things? 😀

Reply 26 of 54, by Nicht Sehr Gut

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
Snover wrote:

Dave, there are no "uncommon" resolutions.

Wouldn't be so quick to say this. Your VALID RESOLUTIONS seems correct but I would never exclude the possibility of some bizarre, undocumented resolution. Also, don't forget the hacks and cheats some programmers used to code. Some of these made (some) CGA screen displays incompatible with any EGA PC (or beyond).

Sometimes, it allowed programmers to create 16-color (Tweaked CGA) games for the PC back in _1984_ . Examples, "ICON: The Quest For The Ring" and "Seven Spirits Of Ra". Both should run properly on modern PC. Now THAT's good coding.

Reply 27 of 54, by Nicht Sehr Gut

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
Dave wrote:

Which of the two things? 😀

If you're talking multi-boot, a Win9x/XP setup seems the best possible combination. You would have DOS (v7.x), FAT32 (presuming you're not using the very 1st version of Win95), and another version of Windows for older Windows titles that don't behave under XP.

You can have more OS's than that, but remember that the more you pile on, the greater the risk...

Reply 28 of 54, by Dave

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Sure, it may be a little risky. But no worries... It seems like I'm going to buy a second HDD on which I can experiment with things... So no big worries, I think. 😀

Dave

Reply 29 of 54, by Snover

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

I was refrerring to the DOS/Win3.

Yes, it’s my fault.

Reply 30 of 54, by Dave

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

I'm probably going to do it, yes. 😀

Alright, no need to call for an ambulance, I'm just fine, and I know what I'm doing hehe. I don't see the problem with it though, seems like you must have jumped off your chair when you heard of it. 😀

Clarification: either DOS or Win9x... Win3x is not of any use of course.

Dave

Reply 31 of 54, by Snover

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Win9x has newer version of DOS -- 7 and 8, consecutively between 95 and 98. So I'd go with it.

Yes, it’s my fault.

Reply 32 of 54, by Stiletto

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Nitpick: Not quite.

MS-DOS 7.0 is included in Windows 95.

MS-DOS 7.1 is included in Windows 95 OSR2+, Windows 98, and Windows 98 SE.

MS-DOS 8.0 is included in Windows ME, although booting straight into DOS was removed by Microsoft; you'd have to use one of the known patches which Colin mentioned in another thread:
http://www.geocities.com/mfd4life_2000/
http://www.overclockers.com.au/techstuff/a_dos_me/

😀

"I see a little silhouette-o of a man, Scaramouche, Scaramouche, will you
do the Fandango!" - Queen

Stiletto

Reply 33 of 54, by Snover

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Don't mind my inaccuracies. Aside from sleeping from 3PM to 9PM, then spending the whole night trying to get stuff done, it's been a while since I've used Win9x and I have a particularily bad memory. (Blame school.)

Yes, it’s my fault.

Reply 34 of 54, by dyinginformant

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Where can I find that patch you mentioned for Jazz Jackrabbit? I couldn't find it on their site - looks like they no longer support old games, so when would they even have MADE a patch that's meant for faster PCs? 😕

Reply 35 of 54, by Nicht Sehr Gut

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
dyinginformant wrote:

I couldn't find it on their site - looks like they no longer support old games, so when would they even have MADE a patch that's meant for faster PCs?

Found this fansite:
http://studwww.ira.uka.de/~s_arent/epic/Classics.htm

It's in German, so unless you know German use the "Language Tools" at http://www.google.com

From a quick check, it appears he used the TPPATCH, but even that can't handle 500MHz AMD or higher, so he used Mo'Slo on top of that. Might check this later, running real low on sleep.

Reply 36 of 54, by Stiletto

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Instead of tppatch, use ctbppat -
showthread.php?s=&threadid=93

"I see a little silhouette-o of a man, Scaramouche, Scaramouche, will you
do the Fandango!" - Queen

Stiletto

Reply 37 of 54, by Snover

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

I'm sensing that soon I'm going to need to add a link to Deep Thought at the top of every page.

Yes, it’s my fault.

Reply 38 of 54, by dyinginformant

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie
Snover wrote:

That's really odd, Dave. I've played Jazz Jackrabbit just fine on my box.
Perhaps you should get the patch from Epic that fixes the 200 runtime error instead of using tppatch (or related utility).

This is what I am talking about. However, if he meant the ctbppat thing that you gave me a link to, than that will do just fine.

Reply 39 of 54, by Snover

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

I said that? T'ch, I was tired.
I meant CTBPPAT.

Oh, and Nicht, "just to be nitpicky," (hehe) I wasn't the one that referred those links.

Yes, it’s my fault.