VOGONS


First post, by Jo22

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Hello everyone,

Just fixed a few things on my sister's Dell Optiplex and upgraded from Vista to Win7.

This makes me thnink about the BTX form factor.
I just realized how strange and different it was compared to AT/ATX.

Some of its ideas were reasonable, though. Like, for example, the better alignment of PCI Cards
(compontents up, soldering side below).

With BTX,they finally were nolonger upside-down as they were on ATX.
In addition, the CPU was nolonger positioned in the way of the expansion cards (+better air flow)..

Still don't get it, why it failed to catch on.

Any ideas why it failed ?

Also, I'm really curious which of you have build BTX machines for Retro Gaming! 😁

"Time, it seems, doesn't flow. For some it's fast, for some it's slow.
In what to one race is no time at all, another race can rise and fall..." - The Minstrel

//My video channel//

Reply 1 of 3, by Errius

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

I was going to mention this in the thread about the "Millennial Troll PC" someone else was building, but then realized it was the wrong era. A BTX Netburst 1.4 GHz RDRAM build would be hilarious.

Is this too much voodoo?

Reply 2 of 3, by KCompRoom2000

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

I've built a Frankenstein Dell computer which consists of an Optiplex 745 motherboard inside an Optiplex GX520 case if that counts. Then again, it's not necessarily a gaming rig, it's more of a video editing/transferring rig.

The major downside of BTX is that video cards that took up two expansion slots didn't fit in most of the cases. I've had to remove the VGA header from my nVidia Geforce GT 610 video card to make it fit without sacrificing a PCI slot in the Dell computer, since that card has DVI-I (which works with VGA adapters) and I really only use one monitor on that rig, it's not a problem.

Reply 3 of 3, by Standard Def Steve

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

I've always looked at BTX as another P4-inspired "Rambus moment" for Intel. It was only a thing because the Prescott P4 ran so dang hot, and the large central fan helped keep things cool in cramped OEM machines.

AMD completely ignored BTX; they claimed that Athlon 64 ran just fine on the ATX motherboard most people were already familiar with. And of course, Athlon 64 was the enthusiast's CPU of choice at the time. Even Intel gave up on BTX after launching the cool-running Core 2 processor, though Dell and Gateway continued using it for another year or so.

"A little sign-in here, a touch of WiFi there..."