Reply 1 of 7, by leileilol
- Rank
- l33t++
Ugh, a 'confimred list' involving unofficial third-party patches. 😐
Reply 2 of 7, by an81
wrote:Ugh, a 'confimred list' involving unofficial third-party patches. 😐
Yes, confirmed. What about it?
Reply 3 of 7, by Scali
wrote:Yes, confirmed. What about it?
I think you should put that in a separate category.
I'd say you have 4 categories here:
1) Official support, confirmed
2) Official support, not confirmed
3) Unofficial patch, confirmed
4) Unofficial patch, not confirmed
Reply 4 of 7, by an81
wrote:I think you should put that in a separate category. I'd say you have 4 categories here: 1) Official support, confirmed 2) Offici […]
wrote:Yes, confirmed. What about it?
I think you should put that in a separate category.
I'd say you have 4 categories here:
1) Official support, confirmed
2) Official support, not confirmed
3) Unofficial patch, confirmed
4) Unofficial patch, not confirmed
Why?
Reply 5 of 7, by Dominus
- Rank
- DOSBox Moderator
If you do such a list, do a proper one.
It's important to know whether it is an official support or whether it's a third party one. Same with confirmed. Who confirmed it? Did you? If not what's the source?
Reply 6 of 7, by an81
wrote:If you do such a list, do a proper one.
It's important to know whether it is an official support or whether it's a third party one. Same with confirmed. Who confirmed it? Did you? If not what's the source?
Official list is halfarsed, official support too. Unofficial support is rocksolid and has clear directions for implementation and they are good games too. Confirmation is either by me or visual material available online.
Reply 7 of 7, by Dominus
- Rank
- DOSBox Moderator
The more reason to do it properly