VOGONS


First post, by feipoa

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

I'm using this card on my testbed right now and was wondering if anyone has a range of part numbers for the DIP-20 memory needed to upgrade this card, that is, aside from what is already on the card. Looks like it has 1 MB, but I'd like to upgrade it to 2 MB. Thanks!

The attachment CL-GD5428.jpg is no longer available

Plan your life wisely, you'll be dead before you know it.

Reply 1 of 10, by The Serpent Rider

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Just scalp needed amount from any common ISA card like Tridernd 8900D? Also times and times again was mentioned here that it's useless to upgrade 542x series to 2 Mb.

I must be some kind of standard: the anonymous gangbanger of the 21st century.

Reply 2 of 10, by feipoa

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Won't it allow 1280x1024x16-bit colour in Windows? That's all I'm looking for.

Plan your life wisely, you'll be dead before you know it.

Reply 3 of 10, by feipoa

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

I have a trident with socketed 80 ns chips, but the GD5428 VLB has 70 ns chips. Is 70 ns needed?

Plan your life wisely, you'll be dead before you know it.

Reply 4 of 10, by mpe

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Sadly only 256 colours @ 1280x1024 with the upgrade and only interlaced due to maximum dot-clock of 80 MHz.

Blog|NexGen 586|S4

Reply 5 of 10, by feipoa

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Wow, he really wasn't kidding when he said "useless". Looks like the best the card can do is 800x600x16 in non-interlaced mode, which it can already do with 1 MB. I understand why know this card was in a PC Chips motherboard.

Plan your life wisely, you'll be dead before you know it.

Reply 6 of 10, by Anonymous Coward

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

They were good value for what they were...budget cards. I think CL must have tacked the second megabyte onto these chips just to tick a box on a spec list. ARK1000 is another card where the second meg is borderline useless.

"Will the highways on the internets become more few?" -Gee Dubya
V'Ger XT|Upgraded AT|Ultimate 386|Super VL/EISA 486|SMP VL/EISA Pentium

Reply 8 of 10, by mpe

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Sounds like it is a better idea to scalp DRAMs from CL cards for the Trident rather than the other way around 😀

On the other hand there is a tiny benefit of using 70ns DRAMs instead of 80ns on 542x series as you can clock MCLK 5 MHz higher in extended RAS mode.

However, thats probably irrelevant as the acceleration features of GD-542x are very limited and thus this won't improve performance much.

Blog|NexGen 586|S4

Reply 9 of 10, by feipoa

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

haha, yup - I put the DRAM back into the Trident. I had one Trident with 80 ns, the other with 70 ns, and others were soldered. I only started using this 5428 Cirrus Logic card for setting up test beds. This way I don't have to use some of my now rare cards - Trio64, Mach64, & S3-968. I don't have very many VLB graphic cards.

Plan your life wisely, you'll be dead before you know it.

Reply 10 of 10, by The Serpent Rider

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

80ns memory should be fine too. BTW Trident 8900D works perfectly fine win 100ns memory. Even if you overclock ISA bus.

I must be some kind of standard: the anonymous gangbanger of the 21st century.