Reply 20 of 27, by jakethompson1
- Rank
- Oldbie
I wouldn't bother with DOS 3.x unless you want to be a masochist. You could do DOS 5.0 if you want somewhat leaner than 6.22 on disk space. You can still do himem+emm386+dos=high,umb with DOS 5.0 if conventional memory is what you're getting at. DOS 3.x can't do this without add-on utilities, but I don't recall what the conventional memory footprint of DOS 3.31 is.