Reply 40 of 93, by Chadti99
- Rank
- Oldbie
PC-Engineer wrote on 2020-09-02, 11:55:I have got 26.8fps with V1.08. with the system in my signature. With SIS496 PCI setup i have got 26.6fps and with a UMC8881 setu […]
I have got 26.8fps with V1.08. with the system in my signature. With SIS496 PCI setup i have got 26.6fps and with a UMC8881 setup 26.3fps - all with 1024kB cache.
But the SV2GX4 had DMA issues with L1WB and some Windows 95 issues with transparent mode - so i switched back to L1WT and synchronize mode. With this setup i have got 25.1fps
The S3 864 was a little bit faster than the ET4000 - 26.8fps vs. 26.6fps. Maybe with a ARK VLB card or a Diamond Trio64 VLB you can gain a little bit higher values.
AND the version 1.08 has a improvement from appr. 7% over the 1.06. So the 26.8fps in V1.08 should result in 25.1fps in V1.06
What was your screen size set to in-game when testing? I wonder what’s holding the three mobos I’ve tested back other than a lower 256k cache?