VOGONS


Are K6-iii chips obtainable?

Topic actions

Reply 20 of 66, by waterbeesje

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

There's a K6-3+ 550 on the Dutch website Tweakers.net, but it is _expensive_

On the other hand, I accidentally bought a K6-3 450 (non plus) in a batch of computers. Mounted on an Asus P5A-B board. Still working great!

Do they do come around, but your best chance to keep it affordable is buying unidentified stuff. 😜

Stuck at 10MHz...

Reply 21 of 66, by Disruptor

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
H3nrik V! wrote on 2021-06-16, 15:27:

A 333? Is that a 95 or 66 MHz FSB? (or both?)

[Edit] Apparently, google is my friend .. It can run both, it seems 😀

It is slightly over 95 MHz.
A SS7 board supporting all AMD CPUs properly has to support both 95 and 97 MHz.

Reply 22 of 66, by Intel486dx33

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

I was able to get some K63+ 450 CPUs about two years ago for about $30 each.
But they are hard to find today for a good price.
Your best bet is to get some K6-2 which you can still find.

Attachments

Reply 23 of 66, by dionb

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
waterbeesje wrote on 2021-06-16, 20:53:

There's a K6-3+ 550 on the Dutch website Tweakers.net, but it is _expensive_

In the seller's defence: it is pretty unusual, a 550ACR rated at 2.0V. They tend to go for very inflated prices. That said, this one's been on sale for quite a while now and no one seems willing to offer close to the asking price.

Reply 24 of 66, by Repo Man11

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Also, the K6-3+ is the end of the line CPU for Socket 7, and as with all CPUs where that is the case, the prices get wildly inflated. Be patient and you'll likely find a decent deal. Not quite a year ago I bought k6-3+ 450 for $32.99 on Ebay, and in Oct. of 2019 I got a K6-2+ 533 for $11.45.

"I'd rather be rich than stupid" - Jack Handey

Reply 25 of 66, by Unknown_K

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

From what I recall the K6-2 design was running out of steam by the time they hit 450 mhz and the added cache was all that made them any faster hence the K6-3 model name.

Collector of old computers, hardware, and software

Reply 27 of 66, by Disruptor

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
maxtherabbit wrote on 2021-06-17, 01:08:

Here's my K6-2 at 375 (it's not stable at 400)20210502_220557.jpg

You tried 83 MHz x 4,5 which may overclock PCI / AGP
Can you try 95 MHz x 4 or 97 MHz x 4 too?

Reply 28 of 66, by Anonymous Coward

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Although I haven't checked this week, the last several times I bought one they were neither expensive nor rare (which surprised me, because I never saw these in the wild back when they were new). On CPU-World a year or two back they had a huge lot of the 1.6v versions going for next to nothing. I still see those ones pop up frequently for about what I paid (I want to say around $15).

"Will the highways on the internets become more few?" -Gee Dubya
V'Ger XT|Upgraded AT|Ultimate 386|Super VL/EISA 486|SMP VL/EISA Pentium

Reply 29 of 66, by AlexZ

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
Joseph_Joestar wrote on 2021-06-16, 07:58:

A Pentium MMX 166 can go down to 386DX-25 speed with both caches disabled. I've tested mine with the original Wing Commander and 3DBench2 and it's working as expected.

I think capability of some CPUs to downclock is overhyped. On these old boards it means changing jumper settings which is not that great as AT cases tend to be quite small, having poor access to jumpers. Disabling caches should be preferred.

Pentium III 900E, ECS P6BXT-A+, 384MB RAM, NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600 128MB, Voodoo 2 12MB, 80GB HDD, Yamaha SM718 ISA, 19" AOC 9GlrA
Athlon 64 3400+, MSI K8T Neo V, 1GB RAM, NVIDIA GeForce 7600GT 512MB, 250GB HDD, Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS

Reply 30 of 66, by cyclone3d

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
AlexZ wrote on 2021-06-17, 05:46:
Joseph_Joestar wrote on 2021-06-16, 07:58:

A Pentium MMX 166 can go down to 386DX-25 speed with both caches disabled. I've tested mine with the original Wing Commander and 3DBench2 and it's working as expected.

I think capability of some CPUs to downclock is overhyped. On these old boards it means changing jumper settings which is not that great as AT cases tend to be quite small, having poor access to jumpers. Disabling caches should be preferred.

This is the precise reason why I like rack mount cases. Baby AT cases plain suck to work with.

Yamaha modified setupds and drivers
Yamaha XG repository
YMF7x4 Guide
Aopen AW744L II SB-LINK

Reply 31 of 66, by mwdmeyer

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
Unknown_K wrote on 2021-06-17, 00:43:

From what I recall the K6-2 design was running out of steam by the time they hit 450 mhz and the added cache was all that made them any faster hence the K6-3 model name.

Yes they really don't scale in terms of performance much past 450MHz or so. The K6-3 is better as the cache runs at full speed but you still have the chipset limitations unfortunately.

Vogons Wiki - http://vogonswiki.com

Reply 32 of 66, by Stedman5040

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

I collected my K6's over 10 years ago and have quite a collection. Lost count really, but some from what I remember are below.

K6-III 333, 4 of 400, 2 450AFX and 2 450AHX. Fastest I got on air was 500 out the 450AFX's

K6-2+ 400ACR, 400ATX, 4 of 500ACZ, 2 of 550ACZ

K6-III+ 400ATX, 4 of 450ACZ, 1 of 500ANZ Fastest I got was with the 500ANZ at either 6x103fsb or 5.5x112 on an Epox MVP3 G2 with L3 cache still enabled. The 400ATX only got to 550 stable.

Stedman

K6 III+ 500
Epox MVPG2
512Mb Hynix CL2 SDRAM
40MB WD HDD
Creative GeForce2 Ti
CMI8738 Sound card

Reply 35 of 66, by PARKE

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
DraxDomax wrote on 2021-06-17, 11:49:

also, what is the "embedded" line of K6?
Aren't they ss7? Usually, when I hear embedded, I imagine they are a different package and soldered on a board...

https://pccomponents.com/amdk6FAQ.asp

"Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) has produced microprocessors from two internal groups within AMD. Microprocessors which include an E in the part number were produced by AMD's "Embedded" Group. Those that do not have an E in the part number were manufactured by AMD's "Desktop PC" group.
Microprocessors manufactured by the "Desktop PC" group were marketed to compete with microprocessors produced by other manufacturers, especially Intel. The pricing structure, warranty, and support programs offered by AMD were therefore designed to be competitive in this market.
Microprocessors manufactured by the "Embedded" group were marketed to companies who designed products that used a microprocessor as part of its integral design. Typical embedded applications might include a Sony PlayStation, cash register, or Access Control System. To make the product more desirable to these groups AMD offered a long term availability guarantee, lower power and higher temperature versions, and often added addition support and or registers desirable to the embedded market.
It is important to understand that the designation "Desktop PC" or "Embedded" has nothing to do with application restrictions. Parts produced by the Desktop PC group can certainly be used in Embedded applications and vice versa.
The only area of concern that many end users have when deciding whether to purchase a part produced by the Desktop PC group or the Embedded group is that AMD has documented that internal changes are often made to allow Embedded product to operate reliably at higher temperatures or lower voltages, and we know that AMD often offered a longer warranty to embedded customers, but the actual changes made to offer a longer warranty are almost always undocumented.
In addition, some Embedded product enhancements included support for new instructions and/or registers or even functional changes,
There is no standard answer for how Embedded microprocessor differs from non-embedded product. The only way to tell for sure is to compare the data sheets of the specific Desktop PC and Embedded Product. If you will be replacing a microprocessor in an existing design and you do not have the time of ability to compare the individual data sheet you can play it safe by using an Embedded microprocessor as the Embedded part is always the same or a better part.

Reply 36 of 66, by NostalgicAslinger

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

I have a small AMD K6 collection, a K6 200, K6-II 400 2.2V, K6-III 400 AFR with 2.2V, a K6-III+ 400 ACR 2.0V and the K6-III+ 500 ANZ 1.8V.
The 400 ACR runs prime stable with 550 MHz and ~2.2V and the 500 ANZ works in one of my retro systems. It runs prime stable with 550 MHz (1.8V) and 600 MHz with 1.95V.

Attachments

  • AMD K6-III Plus.jpg
    Filename
    AMD K6-III Plus.jpg
    File size
    94.34 KiB
    Views
    1097 views
    File license
    Fair use/fair dealing exception

Reply 38 of 66, by brian105

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
janih wrote on 2021-06-17, 18:25:

If you search ebay for "K6 400ATZ" the lowest price for brand new AMD-K6-III+/400ATZ is 70USD at the moment. Stock voltage is 1.6 and rising the voltage a bit it can easily be overclocked to 550MHZ.

Yeah, but who wants a K6-3+ for $70? Already costs 3x what it should.

Presario 5284: K6-2+ 550 ACZ @ 600 2v, 256MB PC133, GeForce4 MX 440SE 64MB, MVP3, Maxtor SATA/150 PCI card, 16GB Sandisk U100 SATA SSD
2007 Desktop: Athlon 64 X2 6000+, Asus M2v-MX SE, Foxconn 7950GT 512mb, 4GB DDR2 800, Audigy 2 ZS, WinME/XP

Reply 39 of 66, by maxtherabbit

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
Disruptor wrote on 2021-06-17, 03:21:
maxtherabbit wrote on 2021-06-17, 01:08:

Here's my K6-2 at 375 (it's not stable at 400)20210502_220557.jpg

You tried 83 MHz x 4,5 which may overclock PCI / AGP
Can you try 95 MHz x 4 or 97 MHz x 4 too?

I like having the buses overclocked, it makes them faster 😀

I don't have those other FSB as options to try