Reply 20 of 25, by feipoa
- Rank
- l33t++
Anyone able to capture Falcon 3.0 gameplay with an FPU on a 386? That would be pretty neat.
Plan your life wisely, you'll be dead before you know it.
Anyone able to capture Falcon 3.0 gameplay with an FPU on a 386? That would be pretty neat.
Plan your life wisely, you'll be dead before you know it.
wrote:Anyone able to capture Falcon 3.0 gameplay with an FPU on a 386? That would be pretty neat.
Good idea! Hope to see it.
wrote:I never really heard about the Weitek, was that faster?
It's not compatible with x87, so it's difficult to make comparisons.
They were supposed to be considerably faster, but you can't run the same code on both. You need specific applications for Weitek, and they're even more rare than x87 code in the 80s and early 90s 😀
They were heavily used in CAD applications and scientific computing.
All hail the Great Capacitor Brand Finder
wrote:wrote:It was more specialized being optimized for single precision floating point.
https://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/optics/olympusmi … tekmathlow.html"...Some experts believed that the Weitek silicon devices might have been even faster than the Pentium and some of the other more advanced personal computer microprocessors. However, utilizing system memory meant that an allocation of address space was required to properly use these Weitek coprocessor chips...
😲
Yup, the Abacus was a memory-mapped device. EMM386 even had a switch for it - EMM386 w=on .
The (dis-)advantage was, that this required the CPU to run in V86 mode.
http://www.easydos.com/emm386.html
Intel vs Weitek
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7w-ZCrvxBek
"Time, it seems, doesn't flow. For some it's fast, for some it's slow.
In what to one race is no time at all, another race can rise and fall..." - The Minstrel
//My video channel//
wrote:Yup, the Abacus was a memory-mapped device. EMM386 even had a switch for it - EMM386 w=on . The (dis-)advantage was, that this r […]
wrote:wrote:It was more specialized being optimized for single precision floating point.
https://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/optics/olympusmi … tekmathlow.html"...Some experts believed that the Weitek silicon devices might have been even faster than the Pentium and some of the other more advanced personal computer microprocessors. However, utilizing system memory meant that an allocation of address space was required to properly use these Weitek coprocessor chips...
😲
Yup, the Abacus was a memory-mapped device. EMM386 even had a switch for it - EMM386 w=on .
The (dis-)advantage was, that this required the CPU to run in V86 mode.
http://www.easydos.com/emm386.htmlIntel vs Weitek
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7w-ZCrvxBek
Impressive! Did Quake support it?