VOGONS


FPU 387 questions

Topic actions

Reply 20 of 25, by feipoa

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Anyone able to capture Falcon 3.0 gameplay with an FPU on a 386? That would be pretty neat.

Plan your life wisely, you'll be dead before you know it.

Reply 21 of 25, by 386SX

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
feipoa wrote:

Anyone able to capture Falcon 3.0 gameplay with an FPU on a 386? That would be pretty neat.

Good idea! Hope to see it.

Reply 22 of 25, by Scali

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
386SX wrote:

I never really heard about the Weitek, was that faster?

It's not compatible with x87, so it's difficult to make comparisons.
They were supposed to be considerably faster, but you can't run the same code on both. You need specific applications for Weitek, and they're even more rare than x87 code in the 80s and early 90s 😀

http://scalibq.wordpress.com/just-keeping-it- … ro-programming/

Reply 23 of 25, by gdjacobs

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

They were heavily used in CAD applications and scientific computing.

All hail the Great Capacitor Brand Finder

Reply 24 of 25, by Jo22

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
386SX wrote:
gdjacobs wrote:

It was more specialized being optimized for single precision floating point.
https://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/optics/olympusmi … tekmathlow.html

"...Some experts believed that the Weitek silicon devices might have been even faster than the Pentium and some of the other more advanced personal computer microprocessors. However, utilizing system memory meant that an allocation of address space was required to properly use these Weitek coprocessor chips...

😲

Yup, the Abacus was a memory-mapped device. EMM386 even had a switch for it - EMM386 w=on .
The (dis-)advantage was, that this required the CPU to run in V86 mode.
http://www.easydos.com/emm386.html

Intel vs Weitek
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7w-ZCrvxBek

"Time, it seems, doesn't flow. For some it's fast, for some it's slow.
In what to one race is no time at all, another race can rise and fall..." - The Minstrel

//My video channel//

Reply 25 of 25, by 386SX

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
Jo22 wrote:
Yup, the Abacus was a memory-mapped device. EMM386 even had a switch for it - EMM386 w=on . The (dis-)advantage was, that this r […]
Show full quote
386SX wrote:
gdjacobs wrote:

It was more specialized being optimized for single precision floating point.
https://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/optics/olympusmi … tekmathlow.html

"...Some experts believed that the Weitek silicon devices might have been even faster than the Pentium and some of the other more advanced personal computer microprocessors. However, utilizing system memory meant that an allocation of address space was required to properly use these Weitek coprocessor chips...

😲

Yup, the Abacus was a memory-mapped device. EMM386 even had a switch for it - EMM386 w=on .
The (dis-)advantage was, that this required the CPU to run in V86 mode.
http://www.easydos.com/emm386.html

Intel vs Weitek
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7w-ZCrvxBek

Impressive! Did Quake support it?