VOGONS


First post, by Grzyb

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
The attachment 1987.png is no longer available
The attachment 1989.png is no longer available
The attachment 1990.png is no longer available
The attachment 1993.png is no longer available

Each version brings different results...

Their slogan "When you think of Standards... Think LANDMARK!" perfectly matches Andrew S. Tanenbaum's "The nice thing about standards is that you have so many to choose from." 🤣

And note that THE LANDMARK CPU SPEED TEST 1.14 is actually newer than 2.00 🤣

Kiełbasa smakuje najlepiej, gdy przysmażysz ją laserem!

Reply 1 of 2, by DarthSun

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Not so big difference 😀
I ran on a beast machine set at different speeds.
HUANANZHI X99 TF/E5 2640v3/GTX1650/C2-T2/HT off/TDP-power profile/@2.6GHz/DOS 7.1 native
CPUspd cd ce txx oxx

Full speed :

The attachment FS1.jpg is no longer available

XT speed :

The attachment XTS1.jpg is no longer available

286 speed :

The attachment 286S1.jpg is no longer available

386 speed :

The attachment 386S1.jpg is no longer available

You don't even need a retro machine :xD

The 3 body problems cannot be solved, neither for future quantum computers, even for the remainder of the universe. The Proton 2D is circling a planet and stepping back to the quantum size in 11 dimensions.

Reply 2 of 2, by Grzyb

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

I've found one more version of the Landmark benchmark...
And I'm inclined to believe that my copy of the 1987 version got tampered with - it wasn't really released as "2.00".

If you have some other version(s), please link/post them here.

The attachment 1986.png is no longer available
The attachment 1987.png is no longer available
The attachment 1989.png is no longer available
The attachment 1990.png is no longer available
The attachment 1993.png is no longer available

Kiełbasa smakuje najlepiej, gdy przysmażysz ją laserem!