VOGONS


Best 5.25" floppy drive for gaming?

Topic actions

First post, by Cursed Derp

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Heyyyyyyyyyo,
I'd like to know everyone's opinion and advice on what's the best 5.25 floppy drive in terms of compatibility and price. Where do you get them? What are the best brands? Can it play "flippy" disks? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks

I am as smooth as a gravy train with flaming biscuit wheels.

Reply 1 of 30, by jakethompson1

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Flipping disks is more a thing of the Apple II era and the original 5150 PC I believe. PC 5 1/4" floppy drives were already capable of reading both sides so there was no reason (or benefit) to flip a disk and put it back in.

Looking at your previous threads, there's no real reason to get such a drive unless you want to interchange data with XT and AT systems that don't have a 3 1/2" drive. If you want to go for it anyway (maybe you just want it to seek during boot?), you just need a 1.2MB (high density), 5 1/4" drive. And you need a floppy cable with edge connectors on it and not just the I/O card end-style connectors for 3 1/2" drives.

Reply 2 of 30, by Cursed Derp

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Ah okay thanks for the info. I would use the drive for old 80s dos games

I am as smooth as a gravy train with flaming biscuit wheels.

Reply 3 of 30, by Deunan

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

You want a standard PC 5.25" HD drive, so that it can read and write 1.2M floppies. It will also read 360k, and even older formats (support for 160k and 320k depends on DOS, not the drive), but can't write those properly. By properly I mean it won't be readable on actual DD drive but this one will still be able to read what it has written, so you can make copies of original game floppies and create saves - no problems there.

The only reason to pick a DD drive is to make the machine period-correct, or if you want to write DD media to be readable by other DD drives. Probably not want you need.

Reply 4 of 30, by dr.zeissler

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

I would always go for the real thing. 360KB !

Retro-Gamer 😀 ...on different machines

Reply 5 of 30, by wierd_w

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

I always went for the high density drives myself.

In the 5.25" category, I was partial to the white NEC ones with the latch. (FD1157C) pretty green activity light.

The only real issue with HD drives is that the head's surface area needs to be smaller than on a double density drive, so it does not really write the data track in a truly proper way when using double density diskettes (between machines).

For your own useage this shouldnt matter, though. A drive should always be able to read its own disks.

I usually paired such a high density NEC FD1157C with a high density NEC FD1231.

Reply 6 of 30, by Cursed Derp

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

I'm only going to use the drive for gaming so this sounds good!

I am as smooth as a gravy train with flaming biscuit wheels.

Reply 7 of 30, by Rav

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Lot of old games could write scores back in the disk (or save game?)

Personally I would use a 360K unit for that purpose if all the games I want to play are in 360K format if I where to get original disks.
If you make your own disks then you can use an HD drive, in that case it won't matter at all.

Reply 8 of 30, by wierd_w

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Given the fragility and rarity, I wouldnt want to use originals anyway.

I'd image them, then write working copies to use. Archive the images, then store the originals in a cool, dry, dark place where they will be protected from oxidation and mold.

Reply 9 of 30, by wbahnassi

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Man, where's the fun in that! Do the reverse. Image the original disk, enjoy playing the original disk.. if it breaks image it back 😎

Turbo XT 12MHz, 8-bit VGA, Dual 360K drives
Intel 386 DX-33, Speedstar 24X, SB 1.5, 1x CD
Intel 486 DX2-66, CL5428 VLB, SBPro 2, 2x CD
Intel Pentium 90, Matrox Millenium 2, SB16, 4x CD
HP Z400, Xeon 3.46GHz, YMF-744, Voodoo3, RTX2080Ti

Reply 10 of 30, by Cursed Derp

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
wbahnassi wrote on 2024-07-24, 19:10:

Man, where's the fun in that! Do the reverse. Image the original disk, enjoy playing the original disk.. if it breaks image it back 😎

Chad

I am as smooth as a gravy train with flaming biscuit wheels.

Reply 11 of 30, by Cursed Derp

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

What's the difference between a 3.5 floppy connector and a 5.25 one?

I am as smooth as a gravy train with flaming biscuit wheels.

Reply 12 of 30, by wierd_w

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
Cursed Derp wrote on 2024-07-24, 19:43:

What's the difference between a 3.5 floppy connector and a 5.25 one?

The shape. Electronically, it's the same.

5.25" is a card edge with a slit on one side.

3.5" is an IDC connector.

Reply 13 of 30, by Cursed Derp

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Is there an adapter to plug a 5.25 drive into a 3.5 slot?

I am as smooth as a gravy train with flaming biscuit wheels.

Reply 15 of 30, by Cursed Derp

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Ahhh nice. Where could I get one of these cables?

I am as smooth as a gravy train with flaming biscuit wheels.

Reply 19 of 30, by DaveDDS

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
Deunan wrote on 2024-07-24, 10:11:

You want a standard PC 5.25" HD drive, so that it can read and write 1.2M floppies. It will also read 360k, and even older formats (support for 160k and 320k depends on DOS, not the drive), but can't write those properly. By properly I mean it won't be readable on actual DD drive but this one will still be able to read what it has written, so you can make copies of original game floppies and create saves - no problems there.

The only reason to pick a DD drive is to make the machine period-correct, or if you want to write DD media to be readable by other DD drives. Probably not want you need.

1.2m drives write 360k diskettes just fine ...

The actual problem occurs if you write 360k disks that were previously written on a 360k drive.. the 80-track 1.2 has
thinner tracks than to 40-track 360k drives - this often leaves some of the original 360k track at the edges.
If you read the diskette back on the same (1.2M) drive - no problem, the thinner head doesn't see the "noise" at the
edges.

If however read it on an actual 360k drive, it's wider head sees the noise on top of the actual track data,
this can cause problems.

When writing 360k diskettes on 1.2m drives that you might want to read on actual 360k drives, best to do so
on a fresh (never written) or bulk-erased diskette.

Another problem can happen with non-PC formats... the 360k drive rotates at 300 RPM, while the 1.2 at
360 RPM - the PC controller "compensates" for this by using a data rate of 300kbps instead of 250kbps
used on 360k drives - this works out the same bit density for DD PC formats, but can cause problems
with SD and other formats - I've got information on my "Daves Old Computers" site about modifying
a HD drive when using ImageDisk so that it can be switches to rotate at 300 RPM, thereby making it
able to do the various formats which don't work at 360 RPM.

Dave Dunfield - https://dunfield.themindfactory.com

Dave ::: https://dunfield.themindfactory.com ::: "Daves Old Computers"->Personal