Nunoalex wrote on 2025-03-11, 13:39:Hi ! […]
Show full quote
dionb wrote on 2025-03-07, 22:15:
These are 72p SIMMs. They are rather old, slow ones though, which might be a problem, and in newer systems SIMMs need to be placed in identical pairs yet this is a mixed bag.
72p SIMMs were first used in PS/2 systems, so were at one point referred to as "PS/2" memory. IBM PS/2 systems can be very picky regarding their memory. One of these SIMMs is IBM-branded and may be from PS/2s, but the others definitely aren't, one being 'Topless', the other is Siemens-branded. I know those Topless SIMMs. They are technically unimpressive, but are broadly compatible with anything that runs slow enough to work with them.
Not sure what to do with your comment about the IBM PC. The IBM 5150 PC is much older than the PS/2 and this memory and uses DRAM DIP chips stuck directly on the motherboard. That's probably not what you are referring to as "normal IBM PC", but it's not clear what it would be. It would help us help you if you could tell us exactly what system you are trying to use this memory in.
Hi !
thank you for you reply guys
Yeah, when I am referring to IBM PC I am of course referring to all the clones compatible with the IBM PC architecture
My question is simply if someone recognizes this Simm modules as exclusive to PS/2 models or all Simms are the same
I cannot make them work on any motherboard of "clone" PCs being it a 486 or pentium
Arguably the PS/2 is PC compatible too 😉
But when it comes to RAM, it pays to be specific. Exactly which 'any' motherboards are you using?
This is 70ns RAM, so anything over 60MHz won't work. The Siemens-branded topless SIMM is non-parity so won't work if parity is required, the other two are parity SIMMs which should work whether or not parity is required, but some BIOSs refuse parity memory if set to non-parity. And Pentium? The vast majority of Pentium chipsets require memory to be installed in identical pairs. and these are three different (4MB with parity, 4MB without parity and 8MB with parity).
I see information online mentioning the PS/2 machines are picky about their RAM, what I cannot understand is if it is the SIMM module that has to be specific to PS/2 or it is the other way around, i.e. all "clone" PC simm modules run on most PCs but only certain ones are accepted on PS/s systems
PS/2 systems can be picky with their RAM, but so can other systems. With zero information on the other systems can't comment here. PS/2 defined the 72p SIMM spec, so normally SIMMs that work in PS/2 systems will also work in non-PS/2 systems.
Aside from regular 72p SIMMs, some PS/2 systems used proprietary 30p SIMMs (the early 808x models) and some used proprietary ECC SIMMs. But please, stop using vague generalizations. Specific machines have specific requirements and specific SIMMs work in them. There are very many PS/2 systems, each with their own idiosyncrasies. Only one of these three SIMMs is an IBM one.
You can look up the P/N of that SIMM and see it's a regular parity SIMM. No ECC weirdness, so it will work in other systems.
I know that broken simms is a thing but I find it strange that "weird" looking simm modules like this ones are all broken and all my "normal" looking simms work more or less ok
Again, please specify the exact boards you were trying these SIMMs in and at what speeds. They are old and low-end, trying to run them past their limits is more likely reason they fail than because they look "weird".
In particular the 'Topless' SIMMs are pretty bulletproof in my experience. I utterly abused a pile of them a couple of decades ago (made a necklace out of them, found a willing young lady, did a photo shoot 😉 ) and every single one still worked fine.