VOGONS


First post, by ludicrous_peridot

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

I am a big fan of M$ EDIT.COM from Win9x, since it does basically everything that I expect from a decent editor, tab handling being the only downside I know. I am so much used to just typing edit for opening the files, that the habbit continued into FreeDOS... where it just doesnt cut it, I am afraid.

So while there are already text editor recommendations around I felt like asking about contemporary replacements for commercial EDIT.COM that are fairly close to it still, ideally keeping same key bindings and/or color scheme.

Better tab handling and taking advantage of more memory (more windows, bigger files) would be the only enhancements I can think about.

GA-G41M-Combo G41/ICH7 - Core 2 Quad Q9550 - DDR3 1033 - Radeon RX570 - CMI-8738 - X3MB (Buran)
Beetle/M/i815+ICH2 - Celeron 566Mhz - Opti 924
https://archive.org/details/peridot-26

Reply 2 of 5, by ludicrous_peridot

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Thanks, I haven't. I am not sure it builds into a DOS EXE though, rust and all the cool stuff that is.
E: Found this fairly recent discussion elsewhere, so trying some of the recommendations there...

GA-G41M-Combo G41/ICH7 - Core 2 Quad Q9550 - DDR3 1033 - Radeon RX570 - CMI-8738 - X3MB (Buran)
Beetle/M/i815+ICH2 - Celeron 566Mhz - Opti 924
https://archive.org/details/peridot-26

Reply 3 of 5, by DaveDDS

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Just in case anyone else would find this useful:

Back in late 1970s-early80s I was doing a LOT of work on DEC VAX systems, and
became very familier with their EDT visual editor which I liked more than any
other editor I'd used. So much so that I wrote my own "EDT" which became (and
still is) the primary text editor I use:

Use: edt <file> [c=initial_cmd -interactive_help -video_inhibit]

for interactive help: F10 'H' F10

It is *NOT* a "fancy" editor and does not have a lot of on-screen prompts or
fields. It just shows a section (25 lines) of text exactly as it will appear
in the final file - like writing on a piece of papar!

Here is the content of it's Help screen - '{}' denote key codes I had to add
for certain systems where ^(control) of special keys was not available:

Special keys                     Commands                 Line ranges
------------ -------- -----------
PgDn =Page forward C =Copy line(s) * =Current line
PgUp =Page backward D =Delete line(s) / =Entire file
^PgUp =Start of file {F11} F =File info n =line # (1+)
^PgDn =End of file {F12} nH =Set Htab size 0 =End of file
Home =Start of line I =Insert new line(s) = =Tagged lines
End =End of line L =List (unformatted) r,r =range to range
F8 =Redraw screen M =Move line(s)
^Left =Word right {sF3} P =Print (formatted)
^Right=Word left {sF4} Q =Quit editor
INS =Insert/Overwrite QQ =Quit with no save
DEL =Delete character Rfile =Read & insert file Examples:
BKSPC =Delete previous S/old/new =Substitute text ---------
F1 =EOL display T =Tag lines D
F2 =Cursor position V =Visual mode 1,10C
F3 =Move line to top W[file] =Write file =M
F4 =Tag line(s) X[file] =eXit/write file 0Rmy.fil
F5 =Del to end of line ?text =Search for text /Wmy.fil
F6 =Del end of line $[cmd] =Execute OS command
F7 =Insert deleted line (null) =Move to line range
F10 =Line mode command
F9 =Re-execute command

I have ported this editor to DOS(16-bit), Windows(32-bit), various flavors of
Unix/Linux, my own DVM virtual machine, my own CUBIX (6809) OS, and others.
The source code is in C, and I've kept it very portable.

Compiled DOS/Win32 versions as well as the source code are available on my
site. There is of course much more complete documentation.

It may take a little "getting used to", but IMHO well worth it - I can't tell
you how wonderful it is to have the SAME (and capable) text editor on all the
systems I work on!

The DOS version is 11k - more capable/smaller than EDLIN(12k) and *much*
smaller than DOSs std EDIT/QBASIC(200k) - makes it very suitable to include
on test/diagnostic boot floppies. (I just looked an W98 EDIT.COM is about 70k
- presumably doesn't need QBASIC like the DOS one)

BTW/FWIW - I wrote this posting (and most of my others) in DosBox using EDT
and copy/paste it into VOGONs

Dave ::: https://dunfield.themindfactory.com ::: "Daves Old Computers"->Personal

Reply 4 of 5, by ludicrous_peridot

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

In the end I settled on @boeckmann 's fork of EDIT.EXE from FreeDOS, which is a much more stable version compared to what's shipped with the OS. After running it for a few month I got used to it very much, but still was finding the color theme somewhat busy.
Luckily I was looking for a ready to use text mode UI framework with compact distribution to produce launcher for Bernewfie, and decided to look into DFlat+. As a "by product" of forking @boeckmann 's repo for that I got a new build of EDIT.EXE which sports familiar colors of MS editor, but also add couple more color themes.
Sharing for those interested: https://github.com/drivelling-spinel/dflatp-a … s/tag/edit-2026

GA-G41M-Combo G41/ICH7 - Core 2 Quad Q9550 - DDR3 1033 - Radeon RX570 - CMI-8738 - X3MB (Buran)
Beetle/M/i815+ICH2 - Celeron 566Mhz - Opti 924
https://archive.org/details/peridot-26

Reply 5 of 5, by leileilol

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

I was thinking whether a fdos edit fork existed the other day that made it more edit.com like (after seeing slop "notepad"). Thanks!

The other new MS EDIT posted was in Rust and meant for windows10+/linux and has huge problems and isn't like Edit at all (and not very compatible with those PxPlus VGA fonts). Just MS retro clouting i felt, and as it's Satya M$ it's probably copilot slop too.

apsosig.png
long live PCem
FUCK "AI"