VOGONS


First post, by furyanwolf

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Hey everyone,

So, with Windows 7 slowly but surely entering the "retro" space, I've started putting a Windows 7 gaming PC together recently. In spite of their relative newness, this PC will sport an Intel 6700K and an nVidia GTX 980, more or less the very last officially suporrted hardware on Windows 7, which is to say, in terms of horsepower, there should be plenty for either of my scenarios below.

That said, I am setting up a new desk/gaming area for this PC and I've reached a dilema regarding what kind of monitor to get. What I know for sure, for the sake of ease of compatibility of roughtly 2006 - 2016 games, I am planning on running most games at 1080p resolution and thus the dilema follows, what would be a better experience:
- 24 inch monitor with native 1080p resolution - my current instinct
- 27 inch monitor with native 1080p resoltion - feels like it would probably look pixelated
- 27 inch monitor with native 1440p but ran at 1080p resolution - the real dilema

My real instinct is to stick with a 1080p 24" to avoid a pixelated look of a 27" at the same resolution but that said, I would enjoy the bigger real estate of a 27" and with monitor prices being quite resonable in all of these categories right now, I'm having a hard time deciding, or rather figuring out whether a 27" with 1440p native but running at 1080p would look better, worse or about the same in quality compared to a 24" running 1080p natively. Looking for opinions, especially of any of you that may have experienced these scenarios.

Thanks! 😀

Reply 1 of 4, by Joseph_Joestar

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

I had an LG 27" 1080p monitor and it looked fine. Might depend on your viewing distance though, it was about 50cm for me.

Also, that GTX 980 is nowhere near the end of life hardware for Win7. You can go much higher than that, and if you intend to play games from 2015 and onward fully maxed, you probably want something that packs a bit more punch. Games like Deus Ex: Mankind Divided and Rise of the Tomb Raider will eat that card for lunch.

PC#1: Pentium MMX 166 / Soyo SY-5BT / S3 Trio64V+ / Voodoo1 / YMF719 / AWE64 Gold / SC-155
PC#2: AthlonXP 2100+ / ECS K7VTA3 / Voodoo3 / Audigy2 / Vortex2
PC#3: Core 2 Duo E8600 / Foxconn P35AX-S / X800 / Audigy2 ZS
PC#4: i5-3570K / MSI Z77A-G43 / GTX 980Ti / X-Fi Titanium

Reply 2 of 4, by furyanwolf

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie
Joseph_Joestar wrote on 2026-01-08, 16:16:

I had an LG 27" 1080p monitor and it looked fine. Might depend on your viewing distance though, it was about 50cm for me.

Also, that GTX 980 is nowhere near the end of life hardware for Win7. You can go much higher than that, and if you intend to play games from 2015 and onward fully maxed, you probably want something that packs a bit more punch. Games like Deus Ex: Mankind Divided and Rise of the Tomb Raider will eat that card for lunch.

Yea I did get the feeling poking around the net that 27" 1080p native would be a matter of distance positioning but it does seem like the potential for a pixelated look is there hence my leaning towards the other 2 options.

As to the GPU, upon a deeper search I do see now that the 10 and perhaps even 20 series may be supported, but I tend to try and build PCs with parts that were released more or less around the same time and the 6700k as far as I could tell definitely is the last Intel series of CPUs officially supported by Windows 7 and it just so happens to have been released arond the same time as the 980 so it works for me 😜

Besides, tbh, initially I was gonna go with even older hardware, a more nostalgic hardware period for me for Windows 7 would've been 2009/2010 (when I build my first Windows 7 PC ish) so I've already pushed ahead quite a bit and whilst you're probably right about the newer games, I expect I'll mostly be playing late 2000s and early 2010s titles on this, I have my modern PC for whenever that PC starts to struggle 😜

But thanks for the insight! 😄 It sure does seem people are mixed on the whole 27" 1080p native topic.

Reply 3 of 4, by st31276a

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Just a stone in the bush -

Is a pixelated look necessarily all bad?

Sometimes I tend to like its aesthetic.

There is something about its honesty that connects with me on a deep level. I do not like the plastic look of super high resolutions.

Reply 4 of 4, by dr_st

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

I would get a 27" 1440p monitor, run the desktop at 1440p, then run each game on the maximum resolution that gives you satisfactory performance. For many games it may very well be the native resolution, for others it will be 1080p, and as was said - there do exist games that can stress the 980 enough for you to want to run them maybe even at 720p (which is half the native resolution).

Text at non-native, and especially non-integral ratio resolution tends to look blurry and bad on an LCD. 3D-rendered games tend to apply so many interpolations, smoothing, blurring, etc. techniques - that 1080p on a native 1080p and 1080 on an interpolated 1440p may not look that much different.

https://cloakedthargoid.wordpress.com/ - Random content on hardware, software, games and toys