VOGONS


First post, by LordLao74

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Hey all,

I was bored so I thought I'd open a discussion on what the best graphics card is for Windows XP. I'm sure this has been before, but I'd say its more about the fun discussion than anything, and as things change over time answers can change too.

To focus in the discussion a bit, I'm asking you to keep the discussion on PCIe options only. My reasoning for this is because I don't think there is much point in discussing the best AGP and PCI options. For AGP, I think everyone likely agrees that the ATI Radeon HD 3850 is the fastest option, followed by the HD 4650, then the 3670/3650. Best after that is a bit more debatable because there are a fair few number of worthwhile options but that would be a whole other discussion in itself and not really focus on what is "best". My reason for excluding PCI cards from discussion is because the market is so thin. You more or less get what you can that works for your system. I think the HD4350 is fairly common in PCI as is I think the GT 610, but not a lot to discuss I think. Though if you disagree then sure let's discuss that 🤣.

As for PCIe options, I will suggest one from AMD/ATI and one for Nvidia.

Nvidia GeForce GTX 645: This graphics card was released as an OEM only card and is perfect for XP gaming. Models are available with either 1 or 2GB of GDDR5 RAM, it has 576 shaders based on the Kepler architecture that connects to the RAM over a 128-bit interface and the card only pulls 75 watts tops, so you don't need additional power connectors. In my opinion, this card has enough performance to run any game from the Windows XP era at a smooth refresh rate while gaming at 1920x1080. There absolutely are faster options, but I feel 1080p is the most ideal resolution to run XP games at and this card is more than sufficient for that. Likewise I like it doesn't need extra power as my Core2Duo E8500 PC only draws around 70-80watts while gaming with this card installed. There aren't a ton of XP compatible cards that are faster than this that don't need more power, mostly just the GTX 750Ti, but I still prefer this card. One plus it has over the GTX 750 Ti is that it is typically very cheap and has a compact, quiet, single-slot cooler that works well as I've never noticed the temps getting too high.

ATI Radeon HD 6670: This card has a lot of names, but a lot the reasons I like it are similar to the reasons I like the GTX 645. It doesn't need additional power, it has at least 1GB GDDR5 RAM and for a quite a few games this card is more than fast enough. This option is a little older than the GTX 645 and not quite as fast, but being a little older could help it in some older games due to older drivers. Just again this feels like a solid option that's typically very cheap, fast enough you don't need to reduce graphics settings or drop below 1080p, not power hungry, not going to get excessively hot and heat up your other components.

What do you guys think?

Reply 1 of 14, by leileilol

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

XP was DX9 at best, so I personally wouldn't bother with DX10+ class hardware because that's also when they've had introduced some precision loss on the depth leading to some noticeable Z-fighting (that new api/feature hype's handwaved over) as well as dropping 16-bit color dithering (something important for compatibility/visual quality), so the ATI Radeon x1### and Geforce7 series would be my personal limit

apsosig.png
long live PCem
FUCK "AI". It is a tool of fascism. We do not need it. We do not use it.

Reply 2 of 14, by NeoG_

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Can you clarify what you mean by best? Widest game support, fastest outright speed, fastest without external power? All of those would return different GPUs as "best"

98/DOS Rig: BabyAT AladdinV, K6-2+/550, V3 2000, 128MB PC100, 20GB HDD, 128GB SD2IDE, SB Live!, SB16-SCSI, PicoGUS, WP32 McCake, iNFRA CD, ZIP100
XP Rig: Lian Li PC-10 ATX, Gigabyte X38-DQ6, Core2Duo E6850, ATi HD5870, 2GB DDR2, 2TB HDD, X-Fi XtremeGamer

Reply 3 of 14, by LordLao74

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie
NeoG_ wrote on 2026-03-26, 02:03:

Can you clarify what you mean by best? Widest game support, fastest outright speed, fastest without external power? All of those would return different GPUs as "best"

I expect many different opinions anyway, but best in like you aren't sure you could pick anything better to use given all possible considerations. I wouldn't think simply the fastest option would necessarily be best, nor the cheapest. The card with the best game compatibility could arguably be the best overall, but I'd say it also needs to have at least enough performance that there aren't any games you couldn't run with reasonably enjoyable settings. What those are will depend a bit on the person. For me as I consider 1080p to be like the 4K of the XP era, I prefer options that would run every XP game with max settings at 1080p or the game's highest supported resolution if less than 1080p. I'd raise reliability, power consumption and heat production as additional items to consider as well, with the best option balancing all of these factors.

Reply 4 of 14, by LordLao74

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie
leileilol wrote on 2026-03-26, 01:47:

XP was DX9 at best, so I personally wouldn't bother with DX10+ class hardware because that's also when they've had introduced some precision loss on the depth leading to some noticeable Z-fighting (that new api/feature hype's handwaved over) as well as dropping 16-bit color dithering (something important for compatibility/visual quality), so the ATI Radeon x1### and Geforce7 series would be my personal limit

I've not encountered those issues myself, or at least not noticed if it was occurring. I would typically consider 16-bit color support more of a Win9x concern though. Do these issues occur in a lot of games?

Reply 5 of 14, by TheIpex

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
LordLao74 wrote on 2026-03-26, 04:11:

I've not encountered those issues myself, or at least not noticed if it was occurring. I would typically consider 16-bit color support more of a Win9x concern though. Do these issues occur in a lot of games?

I'd also be interested in learning more about this; are there DX9 games that don't display correctly on later model GTX cards? Or is the concern mainly pre-DX9?

Intel 486DX2 66MHz
Intel Pentium MMX 233MHz
Intel Pentium III-S 1400MHz

Reply 6 of 14, by gerry

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
LordLao74 wrote on 2026-03-26, 01:41:

Hey all,

I was bored so I thought I'd open a discussion on what the best graphics card is for Windows XP.

it would have been fine to discuss graphics cards and XP even if you weren't bored! 😀

anyway, i like you're suggestions well enough, i even have a HD6670 but in a win 7 machine of otherwise similar spec and can confirm its a modest beast for games of the XP era and more. That's the thing with your choices, they're fine on Win 7 too.

I think your suggestions highlight something - the best cards are ones that play all the games you want and at the resolution you want and don't bother the OS or strain power or overheat systems, they may not be best in scoring on various tests but present the best choice overall.

Reply 8 of 14, by fosterwj03

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

I have a GTX 980 Ti in my overkill XP rig. Technically, a Titan X would be about 2% faster, but not worth the cost difference in my opinion.

Reply 9 of 14, by giantenemycat

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

For me personally, the cut-off point for XP would be anything after 2008. So I would go with a HD 4870. Or 8800/9800 Gxx variant.

Reply 10 of 14, by pete8475

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

I use a 980TI 6GB card in my XP machine.

aka pete4237.5

Reply 11 of 14, by RandomStranger

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

That depends on what kind of PC you are looking to build.

The RV410 variant of Radeon X1050, this is essentially a rebranded Radeon X700 and a great sleeper card. Both in price, and early XP era performance. I'd especially recommend it for AGP budget builds, since it doesn't use bridge chips, but you are looking for PCI-e. It needs looking for specific models, most of the X1050s are using the RV370 GPU which is just the PCI-e variant of the Radeon 9550 so it's likely you get one of those going in blind.

The 7800GT was very affordable until recently and there are still some decent sub-100€ deals. If you are a purist, it has the old version of Nvidia GameWorks some early 2000s games relied on.

The X1950 series is in a similar boat, but generally more affordable.

The GTX260 (facelift version with 216SP) is period correct for late XP at a decent performance level, affordable and offer support for PhysX games. Something that a lot of late 2000s games had and unavailable on ATI/AMD graphics cards.

The Radeon HD5700 series. Everything the HD4800 had, but at significantly lower TDP. Back then I sidegraded from a HD4870 to a 5770 just because it ran that much cooler.

GT740 128bit GDDR5 - basically a GTX650. You lose shadowplay (it's software-disabled for non GTX cards), but it comes in low profile which is great for compact/SFF builds.

GTX750Ti - the same as before, but with shadowplay. Also gives high-end XP era performance around the same level as the 9800GX2 (if its drivers behave) and GTX280.

sreq.png retrogamer-s.png

Reply 12 of 14, by UCyborg

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

I have Sapphire ATI Radeon HD 4890 lying in the basement. Its stock cooler was replaced with Akasa Vortexx Neo.

But with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti, you can also play Wolfenstein: The New Order on 64-bit XP. Though requires bypassing Steam. It's a game that convinced me to buy the new graphics card then.

OpenGL was painful with Radeon...

Arthur Schopenhauer wrote:

A man can be himself only so long as he is alone; and if he does not love solitude, he will not love freedom; for it is only when he is alone that he is really free.

Reply 13 of 14, by Dan9550

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

I'm using an HD 7570 i wouldn't go as far as saying it's the best, but it is one of the better single slot low profile cards I've been able to find for my XP thin client. Doesn't seem to have what i assume is a Z buffer issue that other ATi / AMD cards have when i was testing on my system.

https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/radeon-hd-7570.c393

Reply 14 of 14, by agent_x007

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

If you need single slot no ext. power, an GTX 745 (OEM) I think is a better option than GT 640 for XP (where Fillrate can be more important) :

The attachment GTX 745 vs GT 740 (G5).png is no longer available