VOGONS


First post, by BerkeleyGamecat

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

I've been going through my old boxes of parts in an effort to identify and catalog everything and I came across this somewhat generic IO board.

All of the photos of this board seem to only have two of the three interface chips populated, but in addition to the UM82450 and UM82C450, mine has a third chip with a label on it. Not sure if the label is specific to the chip or just applies to the board in general (GA-4508911 doesn't track online). Without removing the label, any ideas on what additional functionality this chip might be providing that isn't available on the other boards that I'm seeing online?

The attachment UM CT-450.jpg is no longer available

Reply 1 of 9, by NeoG_

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Based on pictures of other cards it's a UM82C11 parallel port interface IC

98/DOS Rig: BabyAT AladdinV, K6-2+/550, V3 2000, 128MB PC100, 20GB HDD, 128GB SD2IDE, SB Live!, SB16-SCSI, PicoGUS, WP32 McCake, iNFRA CD, ZIP100
XP Rig: Lian Li PC-10 ATX, Gigabyte X38-DQ6, Core2Duo E6850, ATi HD5870, 2GB DDR2, 2TB HDD, X-Fi XtremeGamer

Reply 2 of 9, by Grzyb

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Must be something like 82C11, for the LPT port - https://theretroweb.com/chip/documentation/hm … 79896424556.pdf

Such I/O cards normally provide:
- LPT (parallel printer port), via 82C11
- COM (serial port), via 8250/82450
- GAME (joystick port)

Optionally, it's possible to add second 8250/82450 for second COM.

In 2003, I voted in favour of joining the European Union. However, due to recent developments - especially the restrictions on cash usage - I'm hereby withdrawing my support. DOWN WITH THE EU!

Reply 3 of 9, by BerkeleyGamecat

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Not a big deal. My best guess is that this is an earlier version of the card and that UMC came up with a single chip solution that combined the UM8450 and the UM82C450. The other cards I see all seem to provide the same functionality with just two chips. Its just a bit strange that they all provide an empty third socket.

Also, should I technically be referring to this as an expansion board instead of a controller board?

The attachment Screenshot_20260418_115403_Google.jpg is no longer available
The attachment Screenshot_20260418_114632_Google.jpg is no longer available
The attachment Screenshot_20260418_114526_Google.jpg is no longer available

Reply 4 of 9, by Grzyb

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
BerkeleyGamecat wrote on 2026-04-18, 19:49:

Not a big deal. My best guess is that this is an earlier version of the card and that UMC came up with a single chip solution that combined the UM8450 and the UM82C450. The other cards I see all seem to provide the same functionality with just two chips. Its just a bit strange that they all provide an empty third socket.

They don't provide the same functionality.
two chips + empty socket = one serial port
three chips = two serial ports

Also, should I technically be referring to this as an expansion board instead of a controller board?

"I/O board" seems the most appropriate.
"Controller" usually refers to something that controls an HDD or FDD.

In 2003, I voted in favour of joining the European Union. However, due to recent developments - especially the restrictions on cash usage - I'm hereby withdrawing my support. DOWN WITH THE EU!

Reply 5 of 9, by BerkeleyGamecat

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Thanks for the comments.

So, just to put this to rest, the 2-chip version is just a lower price option with vestigial UART headers (or maybe a jumper option to enable them instead of the DB15).

Reply 6 of 9, by dionb

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
BerkeleyGamecat wrote on 2026-04-18, 22:08:

Thanks for the comments.

So, just to put this to rest, the 2-chip version is just a lower price option with vestigial UART headers (or maybe a jumper option to enable them instead of the DB15).

The 2-chip version has one serial port, with 3 chips it has two serial ports (the second one accessed via header pins). The 82450 is/are the UART(s).

Note that the card itself is identical, your pic also shows a card with two chips soldered and a third socket. The only difference is that yours has a chip in that socket.

Reply 7 of 9, by Grzyb

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
BerkeleyGamecat wrote on 2026-04-18, 22:08:

So, just to put this to rest, the 2-chip version is just a lower price option with vestigial UART headers (or maybe a jumper option to enable them instead of the DB15).

DB15 is the joystick connector.
Serial ports use 9-pin or 25-pin connectors - in both cases you connect them to the 10-pin headers in the top-right corner.

In 2003, I voted in favour of joining the European Union. However, due to recent developments - especially the restrictions on cash usage - I'm hereby withdrawing my support. DOWN WITH THE EU!

Reply 8 of 9, by mkarcher

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

The 2-chip version most likely was intended to be field-upgradable by installing the three missing chips, the UM82450, a MC1488 and a MC1489. A PC-type serial port requires 0.75 MC1488 chips (transmitter chip, used for TxD, RTS and DTR) and 1.25 MC1489 chips (receiver chip, used for RxD, DSR, CTS, RI and DCD), as each of these chips can process 4 signals. That's why one MC1488 and two MC1489 are already installed on the card, and you only need one extra chip of each type.

In contrast to the MAX232 commonly used today for similar purpose, the MC1488/MC1489 do not contain integrated charge pumps, but rely on externally supplied +12V and -12V. The MAX232 generates these voltages (well, more like +9.5 and -9.5) from a single +5V supply. This is why missing -12V on the ISA bus causes serial ports to fail with the remaining system still working fine, especially in an era in which there were no sound cards. that had analog amplifier chips powered by +/-12V.

Reply 9 of 9, by BerkeleyGamecat

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie
Grzyb wrote on 2026-04-19, 07:07:

DB15 is the joystick connector.

Right you are. My bad.

mkarcher wrote on 2026-04-19, 09:13:

The 2-chip version most likely was intended to be field-upgradable by installing the three missing chips...

Hopefully more info then I'll ever need, but thanks for passing it along! Old info, like old hardware, deserves to be preserved.