First post, by eliot_new
- Rank
- Newbie
Hello everybody
Does anybody have an explanation about a phenomenon?
I have ECS P5HX-A rev2.1 with a BIOS 1.2 from 08/26/96
This is the very first BIOS and it accepts a 2nd TAG-SRAM Chip.
As soon as I flash the BIOS 09/12/97 the board refuses to boot untill I remove the 2nd TAG-SRAM:
https://theretroweb.com/motherboards/s/ecs-p5 … er.-2.0-pcb-2.1
What is amazing and looks like a trade-off:
1. 96 BIOS accepts a 2nd TAG but shows only 8GB HDD and no USB enabled option visible
2. 97 BIOS doesn't accept 2nd TAG but shows fully 32GB HDD (i.e. the SanDisc sdcard) and I see USB enabled within the integrated peripherals
Yesterday I even run Speedsys and Cachechk and it seems that the 2nd TAG is really working with 128MB EDO
Now I have to decide, before I setup a dual-boot DOS/WIN98SE what is more important.
1. using 128MB RAM, limiting to only 8GB (I have to repartition the 32GB sdcard, currently it has 2GB FAT16, 8GB FAT32, 22GB FAT32) and using an extra USB 2.0 PCI card
2. using only 64MB RAM, having full 32GB recognized and using the integrated USB 1.1 Controller
Are there any "WIN9x" games in the era 1996...1999 which needs more than 64MB RAM?
I bought this board for cheap because I always wanted an i430HX based board.
What I really appreciate is, that:
1. ATX, i.e. I can plugin PS/2 mouse and PS/2 keyboard without an adapter
2. ATX power plug (better than Gigabyte 586HX or Asus P55T2P4 with their BAT plugs)
3. RTC Dallas Chip sits on a socket and is easily removable with a screw driver
4. It accepts a 2nd TAG-SRAM Chip and according to speedsys it caches > 64MB RAM
5. It has white PCI and ISA slots, which looks really awesome
6. It has an USB connector (the Gigabyte 586HX rev1.54 hasn't)
7. The minimum VCore is 2.5V, this means that maybe at least a K6-3/400 nonplus with 2.4V will work
DOS:K6-3/400,192MB,P5A,Rendition v2200 AGP,Trio64 PCI,3dfx V1,AWE64,ESS1938,PicoGUS,32GB
w98SE:P3/450,768MB,QDI440BX,V3AGP,AWE64,PicoGUS,80GB
wXP:P3/1G,512MB,CUSL2-C,MSIFX5600,Audigy1,80GB