TwOne wrote:Thanks for all the replies. I'll try to spend a bit of my weekend trying to get the BIOS flash utility + BIOS ROM on the flash d […]
Show full quote
Thanks for all the replies. I'll try to spend a bit of my weekend trying to get the BIOS flash utility + BIOS ROM on the flash drive and in a working state. I used Rufus 1.4.10 to create the bootdisk.
NOTE: I wanted to flash my BIOS, because of:
- Newer supported CPUs including various Pentium 4s and Celeron Ds
- Improved memory performance
- Because I recently learned at college about BIOS flashing. Currently my system is a bit wonky with USB flash drives, and I don't have any floppies, so that too. (I have more floppy drives than floppies 🤣 )
😵 Shame on teachers for not explaining that firmware flashes aren't something that's done willy-nilly. Here's Intel's take about it:
Intel wrote: Update the BIOS on your computer only if the newer BIOS version specifically solves a problem you have. Intel does not recommend BIOS updates for computers that do not need it. You can view all new BIOS fixes in the release notes included on the BIOS download page in Download Center.
If you don't need said newer CPU (that is, if you can either get the chip to work when dropped in, or you don't even own such a chip/aren't installing one), I'd leave it alone, period. Especially if you care about the board and have never done a firmware flash before. 😊 [I'm not trying to be negative or "hold you down" - it's just that BIOS flashing always has a chance (sometimes only remote) of bricking the board, and if you've never attempted it before/are just learning about computers, I'd do it on something you don't care about breaking vs a machine that matters (especially if the thing that matters is currently working)]
In the future, if you're going to upgrade to a newer chip that doesn't work without the update, cross that bridge when you come to it. 😀
When you say "wonky" what do you mean? That it doesn't like to boot from them? Or there are issues within the OS once it's booted-up? It isn't uncommon for older boards to be less than capable at booting from USB drives. Usually a floppy or optical disc was the go-to for BIOS flashing in days of old.
Also, thanks for the replies regarding the 6600 GT. I don't currently have an different active system with AGP. It might be a bridge problem because a X1650 Pro I tested on the motherboard earlier also didn't work. It doesn't appear Asus managed to fix the problems in an update. But, I quite have no idea what "bridged GPUs" mean. When I Googled it it said these GPUs were capable of SLI/CrossFire. I guess I will keep my GeForce2 GTS for a little longer and look for something of the GeForce FX series.
Bridged means it (the GPU) isn't native to the socket it's got - it uses a bridge between whatever it's native to, and what it's plugging into. In this case, the 6600GT (and the X1650) are native PCI Express chips, and have a PCIe to AGP translation bridge installed to allow them to be AGP cards. These cards aren't 100% compatible/fool-proof as a side effect, and can cause problems with some boards/systems due to the bridge interacting with the board in weird ways. nVidia tends to be better than ATi in this regard, but neither is absolutely perfect vs a native AGP card (like a GeForce FX).
Depending on what games you need this machine to play, GeForce FX may or may not be an appropriate choice - it does a bad job with many PS1.4/2.0 titles, but is stellar for DX6-8. If you need AGP and DX9, the GeForce 6800 would be my go-to suggestion. Barring that, the Radeon 9 is a fine choice, as long as you get an R300-based model, and keep the overheat-death-syndrome thing in mind (Radeon 9s seem to have a nasty habit of cooking themselves to death - I know there was a thread a while ago where folks were talking about, and I've witnessed it twice myself; iirc the consensus was the ATi-designed heatsinks are the problem).