VOGONS


4K and 8K displays for CRT emulation

Topic actions

First post, by markot

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Now when there are coming new 4K and 8K displays, would they be suitable for emulating a CRT monitor? My current LCD has 1280x1024 resolution. Not good at all for retro gaming. But if a 4K or 8K display would be available, I believe they could be much better. Do anyone here have already experiences of them?

Reply 1 of 22, by archsan

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

I'm not even sure there's a 4:3 mode with my 4K monitor (likely not).

No VGA input either on these new monitors, of course, so you would need active VGA to HDMI/DP scaler/adapter of some sort.

(I assume you mean via hardware and not DOSBox since you're posting in Marvin.)

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."—Arthur C. Clarke
"No way. Installing the drivers on these things always gives me a headache."—Guybrush Threepwood (on cutting-edge voodoo technology)

Reply 2 of 22, by candle_86

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

It will look terrible

Reply 3 of 22, by markot

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
candle_86 wrote:

It will look terrible

I believe they should be better, but I would like to see myself how they work. When you have more pixels that human eye can't separate from each other, lower resolutions like 320x200 could be achieved much better than with a 1280x1024 LCD screen. You can't stretch pixels on LCD screens, CRTs are better in this.

Reply 4 of 22, by PhilsComputerLab

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

The software is the other important part. A 4k screen would be awesome for DOSBox, but the software needs to scale it appropriately. For example I mucked around with Nvidia's Dynamic Super Resolution and DOSBox, and the result is really nice!

YouTube, Facebook, Website

Reply 5 of 22, by James-F

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

4k will be very good for quality CRT emulation like HLSL. The higher resolution the better the accuracy of the emulation.

BTW, thanks Phil for the Dynamic Super Resolution heads up I did not know there was an option for that.
Now I can see how my desktop would look with a 4k resolution.


my important / useful posts are here

Reply 6 of 22, by PhilsComputerLab

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

It looks TINY!

To use it with DOSBox, you set the 4k resolution in the DOSBox config file. The end result is that text for example looks more pleasing.

At a 1080p screen, openglnb results in clearly visible different pixel sizes (so a letter could have a thin bottom, but a thick top part). And opengl looks too mushy.

YouTube, Facebook, Website

Reply 7 of 22, by James-F

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Agreed, 4K with 24" screen is definitely not recommended. 😁

DSR is a great supersampler + downscaler, it works very good with dosbox, and I can adjust the blurriness to taste.
openglnb, scaler=none, fullresolution=3840x2160, DSR 30%-50% smoothness, looks excellent.


my important / useful posts are here

Reply 8 of 22, by archsan

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

So, has the subject moved to CRT emulation for DOSBox?

In my LG 27UD68, the Ratio sub-menu only offers:
* Wide
* Original
* 1:1

However, I can't use my old VGA stuff yet as I don't have a VGA to HDMI/DP scaler. Are the good ones only the expensive ones (e.g. Framemeister XRGB)? And that's designed for HD/1080p... I'm afraid new 4K-native ones would be even pricier.

Compare that to getting a good 17" LG Flatron CRT (or any other type you prefer) for less than $10 pickup/local -- an option which many/some people still have today.

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."—Arthur C. Clarke
"No way. Installing the drivers on these things always gives me a headache."—Guybrush Threepwood (on cutting-edge voodoo technology)

Reply 9 of 22, by PhilsComputerLab

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
archsan wrote:
So, has the subject moved to CRT emulation for DOSBox? […]
Show full quote

So, has the subject moved to CRT emulation for DOSBox?

In my LG 27UD68, the Ratio sub-menu only offers:
* Wide
* Original
* 1:1

Specs on the DELL site say it has D-Sub?

For real? What resolutions become available please? And does the 1:1 mode work under VGA?

YouTube, Facebook, Website

Reply 10 of 22, by archsan

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

?? What Dell 4K has D-Sub?

My LG only has one DP 1.2a and two HDMI 2.0 ports. No D-Sub or DVI. 🙁

You mean this one?
http://www.extremetech.com/electronics/229058 … nt-1080p-panels

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."—Arthur C. Clarke
"No way. Installing the drivers on these things always gives me a headache."—Guybrush Threepwood (on cutting-edge voodoo technology)

Reply 12 of 22, by archsan

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Ahaha, right... that must be a mistake on their part... as you can see on the backside photos.

However, thanks to your mentioning DELL above, we found out about this: VGA port on a 43" 4K (IPS) monitor. There is hope!
$1350 MSRP though, I won't be buying it anytime soon. 😁

http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/productdet … en&sku=210-AHSQ
(there's a picture of the ports, it even has serial port!)

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."—Arthur C. Clarke
"No way. Installing the drivers on these things always gives me a headache."—Guybrush Threepwood (on cutting-edge voodoo technology)

Reply 13 of 22, by PhilsComputerLab

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

So I dug a bit deeper. The Benq 1440p screens for example don't even list 1600 x 1200 as a resolution 🙁

Now over DVI that isn't an issue because the GPU can scale it, so under XP you can happily play Far Cry 1:1 pixel mapped.

But VGA is a no go.

YouTube, Facebook, Website

Reply 14 of 22, by James-F

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

This one by AOC is probably the only 4K with D-Sub that is fairly priced.
http://aoc-europe.com/en/products/u2879vf
It has "Aspect Ratio" mode but most definitely will not show 640x400 correctly (4:3), but it will do 70Hz correctly at that resolution.

Nothing beats a CRT for 640x400 70Hz 4:3 mode, where practically all DOS games at.


my important / useful posts are here

Reply 15 of 22, by PhilsComputerLab

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Buuuu:

Video content supporting resolution:
(1) VGA: 1920 x 1080/60Hz (Maximum)
(2) DVI: 1920 x 1080/60Hz (Maximum)

YouTube, Facebook, Website

Reply 16 of 22, by James-F

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

The 4K pixel density and a good scaler is what matters, not the maximum input VGA resolution, there is no DOS game in 1920x1080.
A 4K monitor with D-Sub input, 4:3 option in scaler and 70Hz with the right modes is what we are looking for.

VGA or DVI can't do more than 1080p in 60Hz, not enough bandwidth.


my important / useful posts are here

Reply 17 of 22, by PhilsComputerLab

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

No I want 1600 x 1200. It's the top resolution for a lot of games from the Windows 98 era.

DOS gaming I'm already happy to be honest.

YouTube, Facebook, Website

Reply 18 of 22, by archsan

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Yeah top model CRTs supporting 1600x1200 @85Hz or better aren't as easy to find. Usually are in the range of 19" and above too (heavy).

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."—Arthur C. Clarke
"No way. Installing the drivers on these things always gives me a headache."—Guybrush Threepwood (on cutting-edge voodoo technology)

Reply 19 of 22, by candle_86

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
PhilsComputerLab wrote:

No I want 1600 x 1200. It's the top resolution for a lot of games from the Windows 98 era.

DOS gaming I'm already happy to be honest.

Shame your not local, I've got a 24in IBM in storage, its top resoultion is 2560x2048. It does have some heft to it, I tried to use it on a modern computer desk, and it cracked the 1in plywood instantly.