Baoran wrote:I can't say I have very thin fins. Here is a picture. Fan is this one http://gelidsolutions.com/thermal-solutions/c … e-fan-sile […]
Show full quote
I can't say I have very thin fins. Here is a picture. Fan is this one http://gelidsolutions.com/thermal-solutions/c … e-fan-silent-5/
I didn't really have anything else to replace it with currently. Thermal paste is just normal arctic silver 5.
Still, the heat sink has never even gotten warm during my tests. It would be nice to be able to see the actual cpu temperature numbers.
I assume the temperatures are probably closet to normal k6-3 because I am using higher voltage than 1.6V.
20180108_193017.jpg
You severely underestimate exactly how hot the original K6-III chips ran.
They were also on a larger process node of .25 instead of the .18 of the + models.
Stock voltage for the normal K6-III chips was also higher at 2.2v-2.4v.
When the K6-III chips came out, the biggest con was how hot they ran and second was how poorly they overclocked because of that.
The K6-II+ and K6-III+ are probably A-OK with the not so good heatsinks because of how cool they run compared to the K6-II and especially K6-III chips.
I just like to have really good cooling and really despised and still despise the crappy coolers that were available back then.