Beautiful, clear layout with easily accessible jumpers. Just a shame none are labeled...
I checked UH19, but also no LPX form-factor boards with the OPTi 486SXWB chipset known there, or any unknown OPTi chipset board that match this one.
So, unless someone recognizes it. we'll have to consider it undocumented. So let's reverse-engineer 😀
There are lots of jumpers as on most 486 boards, but they are logically grouped around various functions. The interesting ones are the ones near crystal oscillators. Your board has five crystals: 14.31818MHz and 50MHz in the display circuitry by the ET4000AX chip, 12MHz above the riser, 14.31818MHz near RAM and chipset, and 40MHz between CPU and riser. Those last two are the interesting ones. Boards with a PLL usually use a 14.31818MHz input to generate the various clocks. Boards without a PLL derive CPU clock directly from a crystal like that 40MHz unit. I don't actually see a PLL here, but it may be integrated into the chipset (not been able to find a live link to a datasheet for this one). Regardless, even if the CPU is getting its clock from the 40MHz crystal there's *something* going on in between as it's running at half that, which isn't the way 486 usually work. So I find jumpers JP24 and JP25 to be very interesting. My first guess would be that JP27 and JP28 are involved with the Overdrive socket, but if JP24 and JP25 don't do anything it's worth trying them too.
First boot the system as-is to create a baseline. Run a simple benchmark so you're not dependent on what BIOS is telling you the system is doing. Then turn it off, change the first jumper and boot again. See what has changed. Turn off, put jumper back, then change second jumper. Etc. If one of those four is involved with clock you'll find out soon enough. Early 486 boards ran at 16, 20, 25, 33, 40 and 50MHz, so to get all of those speeds would take three jumpers. Most slightly later ones dropped 16 and 20MHz, so could make do with two jumpers. With a bit of luck JP24 and JP25 will select between 25 and 50MHz. Bear in mind that that DX2 will be running out of spec over 33MHz bus speed, so the DX-50 is a better test CPU here.
Other possibility is that the board derives its CPU clock from the 40MHz crystal with minimal logic in between, only allowing 1/2 and 1x clock frequency. If so, one jumper will control it, and you get 20/40MHz depending on setting. In that case replacing the crystal with 33MHz or 50MHz would give you faster options.