Reply 260 of 300, by Mamba
- Rank
- Oldbie
Warlord wrote on 2023-04-21, 04:28:I820 is slower and rambus on the 840 is bottle necked by the 133fsb, it wasn't untill P4 that rambus made since. Even still the […]
MadYoshi wrote on 2023-04-20, 08:19:An other OR840 is still alive. I got the Board in the year 2009, but was not such motivated, because the Board makes trobble. No […]
An other OR840 is still alive. I got the Board in the year 2009, but was not such motivated, because the Board makes trobble. Now a friend of mine did a recap and now it is as new. It is an IBM Version.
IMG_20230330_190233_1.jpg
The memory performance is not what i expected. I don't see any point in the dual-channel Rambus compared to other chipsets. Or what do you think?
cachemem.png
And a benchmark with a Geforce 6800 Ultra.
IMG_20230403_174648_2.jpg
3DMark01_10957.JPG
In the End the OR840 is nice exotic Board, but a dual P-III Board with a VIA Apollo Pro133A (CUV4X-DLS) or VIA Apollo Pro266 (CUV266-DLS), even my i820 (P3C-D) is more performant. Or it feels like 😀
I820 is slower and rambus on the 840 is bottle necked by the 133fsb, it wasn't untill P4 that rambus made since. Even still the 840 at stock clocks is faster than the apollo pro 133 at stock clocks. But unless youre using some benchmark that leverages dual CPU its pretty pointless especially for gaming benchmarks that are single threaded.
can you try this patch and compare it to single cpu
We found a dual Cpu patch (SMP) that works on old games.
Actually he posted results that could easily be comparable to single cpu VIA platform.
And are not quite satisfying.