Thank you for the check.
The SLACQS comes from Intel, the QS part is printed in >red< in the pdf. The processor number is x3230.
There are two Westmere-2133 in the last overview, is that right ?
I don't want to add more at the moment, first fill in some gaps, like f.e. some first release dates.

PARKE wrote on 2025-06-12, 15:52:

The SLACQS comes from Intel

OK, it's 6 letters so clearly incorrect. I feel it would be good if you posted a file that should have zero issues, further for the 3rd time would you like to me check that GHz is correct?

Sorry for that ' 3rd time' but I was still fixing the formats of the GHz; thus yes please, but with this latest version.

PARKE wrote on Yesterday, 07:42:

Sorry for that ' 3rd time' but I was still fixing the formats of the GHz; thus yes please, but with this latest version.

OK, with this latest version I get as below so the GHz is still wonky.

Looking at the raw data there is such as:

SLBVY B1 0206C2 3.60/6.40/1333/1333 Xeon 5600 Westmere-3600 4 x 256KB/12MB L3 LGA 1366 feb 2011 130 3600.00 27 AT80614005919AB Intel Spec Update / WIKI 32337217US.pdf 21
SLBV3 B1 0206C2 2.667GHz/6.40/1333MHz Xeon 5600 Westmere-EP 6 x 256KB/12MB L3 LGA 1366 mar 2010 95 2666.00 20 AT80614004320AD Intel Spec Update / WIKI 32337201.pdf 6

so for SLBVY you changed Westmere-EP to Westmere-3600 when you should have changed 3.60/6.40/1333/1333 to 3.600GHz/6.40/1333MHz

I suspect 2666.00 should be 2666.67.

There are also still 5 incorrect CPUIDs and 2 incorrect Steppings.

red-ray wrote on 2025-06-12, 14:37:

[…]
Show full quote

1. CPUID 010676 is stepping [C0]
2. CPUID 01067A is stepping [E0]
3. Stepping [C1] is CPUID 010677
4. Stepping [E0] is CPUID 01067A

I expect SL5RR came from https://www.pchardwarelinks.com/remark.htm and is a SL55R typo on that site.

Ok, thanks again.
The 7 steppings/CPUID's are now corrected.
SL5RR is deleted - must be the same as SL55R from the Intel sheet.
But not all SL5xx celerons are stepping D0. For example this one:
https://www.cpu-world.com/sspec/SL/SL5GA.html … google_vignette
is stepping C0 with 1.7v. All D0's have 1.75 volt.
SL533 can go either way hence no stepping/CPUID can be established.
The Westmere GHz was not done yet because I wanted to trim the content to just core + bus and wanted your opinion.

PARKE wrote on Yesterday, 09:31:

But not all SL5xx celerons are stepping D0. For example this one:
https://www.cpu-world.com/sspec/SL/SL55R.html
The Westmere GHz was not done yet because I wanted to trim the content to just core + bus and wanted your opinion.

I found that out the instant I looked at [Celeron CPU S-Specs] and removed the statement. It's only the case for for Pentium III.

At the moment SIV just uses the core speed. Were it my file I would leave all 3.

red-ray wrote on Yesterday, 09:42:

PARKE wrote on Yesterday, 09:31:

But not all SL5xx celerons are stepping D0. For example this one:
https://www.cpu-world.com/sspec/SL/SL55R.html
The Westmere GHz was not done yet because I wanted to trim the content to just core + bus and wanted your opinion.

I found that out the instant I looked at [Celeron CPU S-Specs] and removed the statement. It's only the case for for Pentium III.
At the moment SIV just uses the core speed. Were it my file I would leave all 3.

With the Coppermines the overlap situation is somewhat similar, there are some SL4xx with cD0 stepping while the majority is SL5xx.
The Westmere QuickPath info is in another column now - didn't like the look.
Here is for the time being the last version:

PARKE wrote on Yesterday, 10:43:

Here is for the time being the last version:

Thank you and almost, just the one issue you should fix.

I edited your file so there were no issues.

I feel it would be wise to add the ones that are missing when you have most of those CPUs, basically all of the above.

For proof of QAK9 see Re: Anybody have some 900Mhz 2.8v Pentium III Xeons?

Nice !, thank you. The last one is fixed. The 4 question marks at the top got provisional stepping/CPUID based on logic + reference note in other column.

The CPUID of the following is wonky, please may I have 30030340.pdf + 32012108.pdf?

SL9WN A1 010011b 1.6GHz/533MHz Celeron M 1MB Micro-FCPGA 1.30-0.95 533 1600.00 Intel Spec Update 30030340.pdf

Below should all have Penryn and all the 3MB ones are Core 2 Solo, not Celeron M, see https://www.cpu-world.com/sspec/Core%202%20Solo.html

QJNW R0 01067Ah 1.2GHz/800MHz Celeron M 1MB m-FCBGA 10 800 1200.00 Intel Spec Update 32012108.pdf 35,13
QJPT R0 01067Ah 1.2GHz/800MHz Celeron M 3MB m-FCBGA 5.5 800 1200.00 Intel Spec Update 32012108.pdf 34,13
QJRU R0 01067Ah 1.3GHz/800MHz Celeron M 1MB m-FCBGA 10 800 1300.00 Intel Spec Update 32012108.pdf 35,13
QKUS R0 01067Ah 1.4GHz/800MHz Celeron M 3MB m-FCBGA 5.5 800 1400.00 Intel Spec Update 32012108.pdf 34,13
SLGAJ R0 01067Ah 1.2GHz/800MHz Celeron M 3MB m-FCBGA 5.5 800 1200.00 Intel Spec Update 32012108.pdf 34,13
SLGAM R0 01067Ah 1.2GHz/800MHz Celeron M 1MB m-FCBGA 10 800 1200.00 Intel Spec Update 32012108.pdf 35,13
SLGAS M0 010676h 1.2GHz/800MHz Celeron M 1MB m-FCBGA 10 800 1200.00 Intel Spec Update 32012108.pdf 25,13
SLGEV R0 01067Ah 1.3GHz/800MHz Celeron M 1MB m-FCBGA 10 800 1300.00 Intel Spec Update 32012108.pdf 35,13
SLGAR M0 010676h 1.2GHz/800MHz Celeron M Penryn 3MB m-FCBGA 5.5 800 1200.00 Intel Spec Update 32012108.pdf Core 2 Solo 24,13
SLGQQ R0 01067Ah 1.4GHz/800MHz Celeron M Penryn 3MB m-FCBGA 5.5 800 1400.00 Intel Spec Update 32012108.pdf Core 2 Solo 34,13

Here you go. It may well be that I misinterpreted the classification.

PARKE wrote on Yesterday, 15:10:

Here you go.

Thank you, for SL9WN it says 10011b (13h) which is clearly wrong, I suspect it should be 06F3h so will use that in SIV.

I will add a note. For what concerns the Celeron M classification: the note nr. 13 denominates Celeron and there are 3MB cache examples in there like QJPT. But if you have more correct interpretation just tell.

PARKE wrote on Yesterday, 15:52:

Celeron M classification: the note nr. 13 denominates Celeron and there are 3MB cache examples in there like QJPT.

QJPT seems to be Core 2 Solo, see https://www.cpu-world.com/sspec/QJ/QJPT.html

SL9VA(1 ) double B2 06F6h 1.73GHz/533MHz Celeron M 1MB Micro-FCPGA 1.30-0.95 533 1733.00 Intel Spec Update 30030340.pdf

I just spotted the (1 ) in the above and suspect it should be (2).

red-ray wrote on 2025-05-02, 08:24:

That's a shame, at the moment SIV reports [cC0] but it might be [cA2] and the only way I can think of to know for sure is to use […]
Show full quote

smtkr wrote on 2025-05-02, 01:09:

I don't want to set up a rig to look at it.

That's a shame, at the moment SIV reports [cC0] but it might be [cA2] and the only way I can think of to know for sure is to use a CPUID instruction to read the stepping. What date is printed on it?

Hot links are good so I added one. If I had one I would post a screen shot similar to as below to CPU World

Hi. I still don't have a test bench setup, but since I came across the CPU while I was digging through my stash for something else.

Here's what's printed on the side of the CPU:

800EB/256/133/1.65V S1
10340106-0322 Philippines
i(m)(c) '00 SL4G7

smtkr wrote on Yesterday, 22:40:

800EB/256/133/1.65V S1 10340106-0322 Philippines i(m)(c) '00 SL4G7

Thank you, but it does not really help. Looking in the S-Spec update there is:

1SL4G7 cA2 0681h 800EB/133 256 N/A ECC B SECC2 8,10
2SL4G7 cC0 0686h 800EB/133 256 N/A ECC B SECC2 8, 10

So both could have those numbers, the only way I can think of is to check the reported CPUID/Stepping.

red-ray wrote on Yesterday, 20:30:

QJPT seems to be Core 2 Solo, see https://www.cpu-world.com/sspec/QJ/QJPT.html […]
Show full quote

PARKE wrote on Yesterday, 15:52:

Celeron M classification: the note nr. 13 denominates Celeron and there are 3MB cache examples in there like QJPT.

QJPT seems to be Core 2 Solo, see https://www.cpu-world.com/sspec/QJ/QJPT.html

SL9VA(1 ) double B2 06F6h 1.73GHz/533MHz Celeron M 1MB Micro-FCPGA 1.30-0.95 533 1733.00 Intel Spec Update 30030340.pdf

I just spotted the (1 ) in the above and suspect it should be (2).

Either Intel is right or CPUW is right.
The SL9VA(1) and SL9VA(2) is to distinguish them.

red-ray wrote on Yesterday, 11:17:

I feel it would be wise to add the ones that are missing when you have most of those CPUs, basically all of the above.

Yes, I could not withstand my ocd and added another four orphans.
Btw, the two Pentium II cpu's at the top of your overviews were indeed omitted from later specification updates.
Here is one in which they still occur:

PARKE wrote on Today, 01:14:

The SL9VA(1) and SL9VA(2) is to distinguish them.

Thank you, SIV was not processing Celeron 400 + 500 so I added them and noted:

1. SL9VA(1 ) should be SL9VA(1)
2. SL9VA(2 should be SL9VA(2)
3. Celeron 400 + 500 should have Merom
4. Celeron M + CPUID 00069n should have Banias
5. Celeron M + CPUID 0006Dn should have Dothan
6. Celeron M + CPUID 0006En should have Yonah
7. Celeron M + CPUID 0006Fn should have Merom
8. Celeron M + CPUID 01067n should have Penryn

Thank you. Do mobile chips with the same CPUID come with the same nomenclature ?