VOGONS


Battle of the platforms: socket 754!

Topic actions

Reply 560 of 656, by nd22

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

9. Next is Aquamark 3, a directx 9 benchmark with proper hardware sound - that realtek 658 can not take advantage of!
First is the default score at 1024*768 no AA, no sound, AF 4X:
1. nforce3
2. VIA

Reply 561 of 656, by nd22

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

9.

3. ULI
4. nforce4

Reply 562 of 656, by nd22

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

nforce4 starts again strong in this benchmark and takes the lead!

10. 1024*768 max details + sound:
1. nforce3
2. VIA

Reply 563 of 656, by nd22

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

10.

3. ULI
4. nforce4

Reply 564 of 656, by nd22

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

11. Again an advantage for nforce4, small but an advantage nevertheless.
We switch to 1280*1024 max details without sound first:
A. nforce3
B. VIA

Reply 565 of 656, by nd22

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

11.

C. ULI
D. nforce4

Reply 566 of 656, by nd22

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

12. nforce4 remains on top; let's see how things are standing when we test with sound:
1280*1024 max details. sound on:

A. nforce3
B. VIA

Reply 567 of 656, by nd22

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

12.

C. ULI
D. nforce4

Reply 568 of 656, by nd22

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

13. nforce4 wins by the slimmest of margins!
1600*1200 - the grand daddy of retro resolutions:
A. nforce3
B. VIA

Reply 569 of 656, by nd22

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

13.
C. ULI
D. nforce4

Reply 570 of 656, by nd22

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

14. Final and most demanding settings: 1600*1200 max details + sound:
A. nforce3
B. VIA

Reply 571 of 656, by nd22

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

14.

C. ULI
D. nforce4

Reply 572 of 656, by nd22

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Across all resolution and settings nforce4 manages to stay on top even if by a hair!

15. We go back to 3dmark 2000 - the only DirectX 7 test:
1024*768 default settings:

A. nforce3
B. VIA
C. ULI
D. nforce4

Reply 573 of 656, by nd22

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

For the first time we got a meaningful difference - over 5% - as nforce4 leads by a great amount!

16. 3dmark 2000 - 1280*1024 max details:
A. nforce3
B. VIA
C. ULI
D. nforce4

Reply 574 of 656, by nd22

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Clearly ULI has problems with the Radeon as evidenced by the results! Note that cool and quiet was deactivated on all the systems otherwise in 3dmark you would get abysmal scores: <10000!

17. 3dmark 2000 - 1600*1200
A. nforce3
B. VIA
C. ULI
D. nforce4

Reply 575 of 656, by nd22

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

NVIDIA nforce4 takes no prisoners in this older benchmark!

18. No introduction needed for the next test: 3dmark 2001! Default settings first.
A. nforce3
B. VIA
C. ULI
D. nforce4

Reply 576 of 656, by nd22

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

19. 3dmark 2001 - 1280*1024 maxed out!
A. nforce3
B. VIA
C. ULI
D. nforce4

Reply 577 of 656, by nd22

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

20. 3dmark 2001 - 1600*1200
A. nforce3
B. VIA
C. ULI
D. nforce4

Reply 578 of 656, by nd22

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

20. As you have seen in the screenshot with the Abit NV8 system Radeon X1950 PRO can do 6x antialiasing. However I chose to test with AA 4x for 2 reasons: direct comparison with NVIDIA's geforce 7800gs that can do only 4x AA and in order to not overwhelm the radeon in directx 9 benchmarks and games.
Here is the result for Abit NV8 at 1600*1200 AA 4X:

Reply 579 of 656, by nd22

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

The results seems to be split in 2 groups: one with nforce3 and ULI and one with nforce4 and VIA! Again nforce4 leads the others across all resolutions! Also Radeon is capable of higher scores with a stronger CPU in 3dmark 2001!

Last edited by nd22 on 2025-12-29, 03:24. Edited 1 time in total.