VOGONS


First post, by RetroPCCupboard

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

I have acquired a small PC in a MicroATX low profile case. The motherboard is a Gigabyte GA-6VEML.

It supports Tualatin (currently has a 1.3Ghz Celeron). Has an ISA slot. There is no AGP slot. It has onboard Trident Blade3D graphics.

According to this, the onboard audio works in DOS:

VIA 686B AC'97 audio works really well in DOS (SB Pro stereo + OPL3 emulation!)

So, what would you do with it?

The ISA slot seems a little wasted here to me, as I am not aware of any low profile ISA soundcards. For PCI video there aren't too many options that I think make sense here.

Thoughts?

Reply 2 of 27, by wierd_w

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

There's an old thread about low profile isa soundcards, but with a functional onboard one I question why.

Any low profile ISA/EISA sound card out there.

I'd want to put dualboot svardos + winxp setup on there, and use it for a compact game appliance.

Reply 3 of 27, by RetroPCCupboard

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
cyclone3d wrote on 2026-03-27, 19:08:

Put it in a different case? Make an external enclosure and extension cables so you can use the slots?

Yeah, it does seem to me that better use could be made out of the Tualatin with a full-size PCI slot.

wierd_w wrote on 2026-03-27, 19:11:

There's an old thread about low profile isa soundcards, but with a functional onboard one I question why.

Any low profile ISA/EISA sound card out there.

I'd want to put dualboot svardos + winxp setup on there, and use it for a compact game appliance.

I would think that it wont be as compatible as genuine soundblaster. But, yeah, I should try onboard audio

Reply 4 of 27, by NeoG_

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

A PicoGUS and a WP32 or WavetablePi

98/DOS Rig: BabyAT AladdinV, K6-2+/550, V3 2000, 128MB PC100, 20GB HDD, 128GB SD2IDE, SB Live!, SB16-SCSI, PicoGUS, WP32 McCake, iNFRA CD, ZIP100
XP Rig: Lian Li PC-10 ATX, Gigabyte X38-DQ6, Core2Duo E6850, ATi HD5870, 2GB DDR2, 2TB HDD, X-Fi XtremeGamer

Reply 5 of 27, by RetroPCCupboard

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
wierd_w wrote on 2026-03-27, 19:11:

I'd want to put dualboot svardos + winxp setup on there, and use it for a compact game appliance.

I have never heard of svardos. I see now that it was based on FreeDOS (which I have heard of).

Is there any reason in particular you'd use that OS over MS-DOS?

Reply 6 of 27, by RetroPCCupboard

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
NeoG_ wrote on 2026-03-27, 21:24:

A PicoGUS and a WP32 or WavetablePi

I have been considering getting a PicoGUS for another PC. But that isn't low profile, so won't fit in this case.

I kinda bought this PC without looking properly. Just saw ISA and Tualatin then hit the "Buy" button, as was cheap. I noticed afterwards the lack of AGP.

Reply 7 of 27, by Major Jackyl

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

I have a similar board. I use it only for testing Tualatin CPUs without taking apart my primary Tually PC (which has TUSL2).

I also ran windows 7 on it, for a good laugh. The 20GB drive was basically completely consumed and it took maybe 4+ hours? Absolutely useless after that, 🤣 No drivers for the VGA or audio in windows 7, not that it matters much; absolute slug-fest

The attachment QDI_C1K_SUM.png is no longer available

Oldest, slowest PC I ever installed 7 on, don't think it's possible to sink any lower than that.

Main Loadout (daily drivers):
Intel TE430VX, Pentium Sy022 (133), Cirrus Logic 5440, SB16 CT1740
ECS K7S5A, A-XP1600+, MSI R9550
ASUS M2N-E, A64X2-4600+, PNY GTX670, SB X-Fi Elite Pro
MSI Z690, Intel 12900K, MSI RTX3090, SB AE-7

Reply 8 of 27, by Shponglefan

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Lack of AGP seems like a big hindrance to a Tualatin level system. Unless maybe running a Voodoo4 or 5 PCI card maybe?

But if the intent is to keep it in the existing case, then not a lot of options.

Pentium 4 Multi-OS Build
486 DX4-100 with 6 sound cards
486 DX-33 with 5 sound cards

Reply 9 of 27, by kixs

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
Major Jackyl wrote on 2026-03-27, 22:22:
I have a similar board. I use it only for testing Tualatin CPUs without taking apart my primary Tually PC (which has TUSL2). […]
Show full quote

I have a similar board. I use it only for testing Tualatin CPUs without taking apart my primary Tually PC (which has TUSL2).

I also ran windows 7 on it, for a good laugh. The 20GB drive was basically completely consumed and it took maybe 4+ hours? Absolutely useless after that, 🤣 No drivers for the VGA or audio in windows 7, not that it matters much; absolute slug-fest

The attachment QDI_C1K_SUM.png is no longer available

Oldest, slowest PC I ever installed 7 on, don't think it's possible to sink any lower than that.

You should have used a SSD and some later PCI card like Geforce 8400GS. It would be completely other experience.

Visit my AmiBay items for sale (updated: 2026-03-23). I also take requests 😉
https://www.amibay.com/members/kixs.977/#sales-threads

Reply 10 of 27, by Major Jackyl

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
kixs wrote on 2026-03-27, 23:23:
Major Jackyl wrote on 2026-03-27, 22:22:
I have a similar board. I use it only for testing Tualatin CPUs without taking apart my primary Tually PC (which has TUSL2). […]
Show full quote

I have a similar board. I use it only for testing Tualatin CPUs without taking apart my primary Tually PC (which has TUSL2).

I also ran windows 7 on it, for a good laugh. The 20GB drive was basically completely consumed and it took maybe 4+ hours? Absolutely useless after that, 🤣 No drivers for the VGA or audio in windows 7, not that it matters much; absolute slug-fest

The attachment QDI_C1K_SUM.png is no longer available

Oldest, slowest PC I ever installed 7 on, don't think it's possible to sink any lower than that.

You should have used a SSD and some later PCI card like Geforce 8400GS. It would be completely other experience.

Not sure if any of my PCI SATA cards would've booted it, so getting an SSD on this board could be tricky. Best I could've done in the GPU department is a 5200, which is the "last" nvidia PCI card? 8400GS is a PCI-e card. I've NEVER seen anything higher than 5 series in PCI form. I don't have drivers for 5 series or lower for windows 7, either, so I would need to find some of those. Thinking about it sounds like a hassle, 🤣 Only to waste the ISA in the end because windows 7 doesn't know anything about it.

Main Loadout (daily drivers):
Intel TE430VX, Pentium Sy022 (133), Cirrus Logic 5440, SB16 CT1740
ECS K7S5A, A-XP1600+, MSI R9550
ASUS M2N-E, A64X2-4600+, PNY GTX670, SB X-Fi Elite Pro
MSI Z690, Intel 12900K, MSI RTX3090, SB AE-7

Reply 11 of 27, by NeoG_

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
RetroPCCupboard wrote on 2026-03-27, 22:09:
NeoG_ wrote on 2026-03-27, 21:24:

A PicoGUS and a WP32 or WavetablePi

I have been considering getting a PicoGUS for another PC. But that isn't low profile, so won't fit in this case.

I kinda bought this PC without looking properly. Just saw ISA and Tualatin then hit the "Buy" button, as was cheap. I noticed afterwards the lack of AGP.

Oh dang that ISA slot is a writeoff

98/DOS Rig: BabyAT AladdinV, K6-2+/550, V3 2000, 128MB PC100, 20GB HDD, 128GB SD2IDE, SB Live!, SB16-SCSI, PicoGUS, WP32 McCake, iNFRA CD, ZIP100
XP Rig: Lian Li PC-10 ATX, Gigabyte X38-DQ6, Core2Duo E6850, ATi HD5870, 2GB DDR2, 2TB HDD, X-Fi XtremeGamer

Reply 12 of 27, by rasz_pl

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Who needs AGP when you have AMR?!?! 😀
ISA slot is more of a DOS thing, so I dont see lack of AGP as a problem. Savage4 has excellent DOS compatibility.
PLE133T is VIA 694T + Savage4. Not great, not quite terrible. ~Banshee performance? Will play UT fine.

https://github.com/raszpl/sigrok-disk FM/MFM/RLL decoder
https://github.com/raszpl/FIC-486-GAC-2-Cache-Module (AT&T Globalyst)
https://github.com/raszpl/386RC-16 ram board
https://github.com/raszpl/440BX Reference Design adapted to Kicad

Reply 13 of 27, by RetroPCCupboard

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

I have just been looking what graphics cards I have in PCI. I have Geforce FX 5500, Geforce 6200, TNT 2 M64, Matrox Mistique 220, Matrox Millennium 8Mb, Voodoo 2 12Mb, nVidia Riva 128, a few S3 videos cards.

Obviously none of these are low profile, but I could, as suggested, move this motherboard to a full size case.

Reply 14 of 27, by RetroPCCupboard

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

I also have a Radeon 7000 64Mb PCI

Reply 15 of 27, by RetroPCCupboard

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

BTW, I should mention that I do already have a Tualatin 1.4Ghz machine in a full case. With Geforce 2 Ti. So I wasnt really looking to build something too similar to that. There is no ISA slot in that full desktop Tualatin.

I think this little SFF case that this Tualatin came in is kinda cute:

The attachment 20260328_051741.jpg is no longer available
The attachment 20260328_051757.jpg is no longer available
The attachment 20260328_051817.jpg is no longer available

I could put something else in this case, if its a waste of a Tualatin. For example a Pentium 4 or Core 2 Duo with a low profile GPU and soundcard (or keep the onboard audio).

Or I could keep it, as is, for a really overpowered DOS machine. The Trident graphics, I would assume, is ok for DOS? As I said in my first post, the onboard sound does appear to have some kind of soundblaster compatability:

The attachment 20260328_074214.jpg is no longer available

Maybe I could put my NuXT motherboard in here, and put a 5.25" 360Drive instead of the current optical drive....

Reply 16 of 27, by RetroPCCupboard

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
Major Jackyl wrote on 2026-03-27, 22:22:
I have a similar board. I use it only for testing Tualatin CPUs without taking apart my primary Tually PC (which has TUSL2). […]
Show full quote

I have a similar board. I use it only for testing Tualatin CPUs without taking apart my primary Tually PC (which has TUSL2).

I also ran windows 7 on it, for a good laugh. The 20GB drive was basically completely consumed and it took maybe 4+ hours? Absolutely useless after that, 🤣 No drivers for the VGA or audio in windows 7, not that it matters much; absolute slug-fest

The attachment QDI_C1K_SUM.png is no longer available

Oldest, slowest PC I ever installed 7 on, don't think it's possible to sink any lower than that.

Yikes. You are brave to try Windows 7 on it!

Shponglefan wrote on 2026-03-27, 22:32:

Lack of AGP seems like a big hindrance to a Tualatin level system. Unless maybe running a Voodoo4 or 5 PCI card maybe?

But if the intent is to keep it in the existing case, then not a lot of options.

Unfortunately I do not have a PCI Voodoo 4 or 5. Or Voodoo 3 PCI for that matter.

rasz_pl wrote on 2026-03-28, 01:53:

Who needs AGP when you have AMR?!?! 😀
ISA slot is more of a DOS thing, so I dont see lack of AGP as a problem. Savage4 has excellent DOS compatibility.
PLE133T is VIA 694T + Savage4. Not great, not quite terrible. ~Banshee performance? Will play UT fine.

Is it Savage 4? I read somewhere that this chipset had Trident Blade3D?

Major Jackyl wrote on 2026-03-27, 23:46:

Not sure if any of my PCI SATA cards would've booted it, so getting an SSD on this board could be tricky. Best I could've done in the GPU department is a 5200, which is the "last" nvidia PCI card? 8400GS is a PCI-e card. I've NEVER seen anything higher than 5 series in PCI form. I don't have drivers for 5 series or lower for windows 7, either, so I would need to find some of those. Thinking about it sounds like a hassle, 🤣 Only to waste the ISA in the end because windows 7 doesn't know anything about it.

I have a PCI Geforce 6200 and also a PCI Geforce FX 550o. Both are full height though. The 550o is not an official nVidia product as far as I know. I think a third party has used 5200 GPUs, over-clocked them slightly and put a 128-bit bus for the memory

Reply 17 of 27, by RetroPCCupboard

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Yeah, the manual for the motherboard on Gigabyte website says this:

On-Board VGA - Build in Trident Blade 3D/Pro Media in VT8601T

Reply 18 of 27, by RetroPCCupboard

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
rasz_pl wrote on 2026-03-28, 01:53:

PLE133T is VIA 694T + Savage4. Not great, not quite terrible. ~Banshee performance? Will play UT fine.

I think I see the confusion now.

PL133T has Savage 4
PLE133T has Trident Blade3D

At least that's what a quick web search is telling me.

The savage4 is apparently in the region of 30-50% faster than the Blade3D, and it supports T&L, where the Blade3D does not....

Reply 19 of 27, by wierd_w

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
RetroPCCupboard wrote on 2026-03-27, 21:41:
wierd_w wrote on 2026-03-27, 19:11:

I'd want to put dualboot svardos + winxp setup on there, and use it for a compact game appliance.

I have never heard of svardos. I see now that it was based on FreeDOS (which I have heard of).

Is there any reason in particular you'd use that OS over MS-DOS?

It can start win3.11 😁

Also, it's based on released DR-DOS sources, not freedos sources.