Reply 31400 of 31407, by Nexxen
- Rank
- l33t
MattRocks wrote on Yesterday, 12:43:Nexxen wrote on Yesterday, 11:33:DaveDDS wrote on Yesterday, 11:12:When it makes a disk "unrecoverable" are there any physical signs? Usually when drives start damaging media it's because of "cra […]
When it makes a disk "unrecoverable" are there any physical signs? Usually when drives start damaging media it's because of "crap" sticking to the head which scrapes away at the disks magnetic coating producing visible lines where the head touches it while spinning,
It's been years since I had an LS120 ... I recall that it does higher capacity on "special" disks, but I don't recall if it can access/use "standard" 3.5" disks. If it can ... does the same kind of damage occur in those?
If no visible damage, try using a bulk eraser to completely "unformat" the disk, then see if it can be formatted/used in another drive.
And... the question ... how/why does it "jam", sounds like more than the media is getting damaged...?
I can confirm that it can read 3.5" floppies.
It was considered good at it.When it worked, it was very good in a MMX/P2 build when USB was unreliable and CDR was slow. But, they were never critical. No publisher distributed software on LS120.
I think so after reading and watching stuff about it.
Other competitors were around.
I never heard of Caleb or Castlewood or Sony HiFD before some YT video review and it didn't end well for those.
Never made it to Italy or with too little publicity before they got boxed for good.
CDs and CD-RW made that tech irrelevant.
Zip wasn't that popular over here, most people wouldn't need it. Me finding a floptical 21MB was kinda pretty much sheer luck.
This is just me rambling 😀
PC#1 Pentium 233 MMX - 98SE
PC#2 PIII-1Ghz - 98SE/W2K
- "One hates the specialty unobtainium parts, the other laughs in greed listing them under a ridiculous price" - kotel studios
- Bare metal ist krieg.