VOGONS


First post, by kneiver

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Hello. I have a question.

1. I recently acquired a used Quadro FX 1100, which I believe originally came with an HP system.

I understand the Device ID for the Quadro FX 1100 to be 10DE (Nvidia) for the vendor and 034E for the device itself. However, no matter which version of nvflash I use, it consistently reports the ID as 10DE:034A.

As a result, the Nvidia driver setup program fails to automatically detect the card when I try to install driver version 56.64; I have to manually specify it as an FX 1100 or FX 5700.
(There are no functional issues, but it appears as "Unknown" in the Nvidia driver control panel.)

I also tried flashing various other BIOS versions (such as those found on Whitebunny and Theretroweb), but all attempts failed.

Finally, I attempted to modify the card by calculating the strap settings, but I ended up in a situation where the graphics card is no longer recognized by the system at all.

2. I’m seeing this same issue with a PCI graphics card I bought on eBay. It’s a GeForce2 MX400 PCI (the chip itself is clearly marked "MX400"), but the driver identifies it as an MX100/200. It functions perfectly fine, though. I tried a few times to get it recognized correctly but eventually just gave up.

I recall reading on Vogons that the Device ID is determined by the arrangement of resistors around the chip—is that correct? What can I do to make the name display correctly (so the driver automatically recognizes the chip properly)?

Reply 1 of 4, by MikeSG

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

I want to say the device ID is correct, and the driver is too old.

The latest versions are available on Nvidia's website for all cards and all Windows OS's.

169.96 Quadro driver for Windows 2K/XP
81.98 Forceware driver for Windows 95/98/ME

https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/drivers/

Reply 2 of 4, by kneiver

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie
MikeSG wrote on 2026-07-19, 09:08:
I want to say the device ID is correct, and the driver is too old. […]
Show full quote

I want to say the device ID is correct, and the driver is too old.

The latest versions are available on Nvidia's website for all cards and all Windows OS's.

169.96 Quadro driver for Windows 2K/XP
81.98 Forceware driver for Windows 95/98/ME

https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/drivers/

I simply want to use a driver version of 56.64 or lower. As you suggested, I'll check if the newer driver version recognizes it.

Reply 3 of 4, by agent_x007

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

You can't install it, because Hardware ID of your card isn't listed in .inf files.
If you refuse to use newer drivers, the only option is to exchange all GeForce 5700 (Ultra) hardware ID's with whatever your card has.
Note : 56.64 is the 1-st driver that even supports NV36 chip from FX 5700 class of GPUs.
Expect compatibility issues, crashes and general weirdness. ANY older driver will also fail to load (because there is no NV36).

You could try to force NV34 driver (a.k.a. FX 5600), by utilizing that hardware ID swap hack - however expect even bigger issues (this is equivalent of using RTX 4060 drivers on RTX 5050).

Bottom line : I'd say, try 71.84 driver and see how it works out for you. If you must be on 56.64 or older, just buy FX 5600 or FX 5800/59x0 (since I assume FX 5200 is too slow for you).

Reply 4 of 4, by kneiver

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

It’s been a while since I last posted an update.

After much deliberation—since I didn't want to buy a new graphics card and was reluctant to use drivers newer than version 56.64—I decided to make one last attempt: flashing a new BIOS onto the FX1100 card, which wasn't even being recognized by the motherboard BIOS.

I bought a CH341B programmer and an 8-pin clip from AliExpress and flashed the new BIOS directly onto the card without removing the existing ROM chip.

As a result, the FX1100 card was successfully detected by the `nvflash -a` command.
I then overwrote the BIOS by entering the command: `nvflash -i 0 -j -4 -5 -6 nv36.rom`.

Fortunately, the card returned to the state it was in when I first bought it.
Of course, I still have to force the installation of the 56.64 driver for the FX1100, and it shows up as "Unknown" in the advanced tab, but since there are no issues with performance or functionality, I’m satisfied with this outcome.

I’m happy to have revived the graphics card and plan to put it to good use.

Thanks to the two people who provided answers. I really wanted to stick with the 56.64 driver, so I hope you understand! (°_°)