Roland User wrote on 2026-07-25, 10:15:

This at all inexplicable ! You make two identicaly version , but on hash this not match )
at the same time nowhere not provide checksums as compressed in UPX so uncompressed versions , what for so do ?
And I think what not need do compression UPX if you place files on your site , because if do compress already compressed files , size of ZIP archive will bigger , also because your project aim on retro PC , UPX files with usage consumes more memory if compare this with file whitch not compressed in UPX , UPX consumes memory size UPX + uncompressed of UPX )

First of all control your tone or I will not bother with any of your stupid artificial problems... If you do not like any of my software your are not forced to use it.
Simply use something else that is packed and works the way you like.
This would make both of us happier.

And for test this Re: Falcosoft Soundfont Midi Player + Munt VSTi + BassMidi VSTi time do you have ) why I that think ? That's why for test this , you need open any MIDI file for play per LoopMIDI port In whitch input port for your WinMM Multi Port VSTi , next you can select out port to any virtual synth , you even not need hear output sound , but via 3-6 hours you simply need rechange output to any other VSTi port , maybe this in this time will be required do several times , but this you not will interfere even if you on work )

Falcosoft wrote on 2026-07-25, 11:14:

First of all control your tone or I will not bother with any of your stupid artificial problems... If you do not like any of my software your are not forced to use it.

Zoltan , problem in so what your WinMM Multi Port VSTi and MUNT this is unique solution whitch not available alternative , me no one to turn to except you
I'm realy can not understand that this could be what version identicaly , but checksumm diffirent , when I check version on your site , I see on version , I even can not thinked that files may diffirent by content , if I sayd about this rude , please , excusme
What about UPX , I really so think , and more , I known this
What about MUNT , problem not in your solution , but in this solution https://github.com/MusicallyInspired/MT32edit4v/issues/1 , I think what you can help this author do addon correctly )

And if return to my previous offers , so I see what you on me slightly angry when I say I want you what your WinMM Multi Port VSTi expand up to 16 ports , and the problem is how I and you see your solution , you see WinMM Multi Port VSTi as solution for correctly work with synthesizers on which four MIDI ports and 64 MIDI channels with polyphony up to 128 voices , so can , but this so very limited solution , if consider my offer , on which you resist , my offer this full-fledged MIDI mapper and MIDI router with 16 output ports whitch can use as now , but can use and for select one port - one synth ) , and here I can not understand why you so resist ) , after all, in the end If you release what I ask , your plugin simply get more flexibility ) and this solution will can use as expander for up to 64 MIDI channels , and as expander for up to 256 channels , or as very flexibility MIDI router where one channel - one synth )
simply I always for absolute flixebility in application or plugin ) and the only place very against such flexibility , this when can will lost quality ) for example , I think what MP3 need compress so how was make in my transcoder , because if give free settings , can get very bad on quality result )
Simply when I see to your solution , I see very big potential of opportunities , and understanding this , I can not understand why you reject of this )

I see what you think like so :
Now available syntheszer with 4 MIDI ports and 64 channel , means I make only 4 MIDI ports for currently synthesizers
If tomorrow Roland or YAMAHA make synthesizer with 6 MIDI ports , means I add two MIDI ports in my WinMM Multi Port VSTi and not more
but this initially limited solution , because on every next step solution need remake )

Please , think about I say to you )

Munt bug https://www.mediafire.com/file/52wejw1bur3fyd … nt_bug.avi/file

Roland User wrote on 2026-07-25, 08:01:

Good , I report you this information ) I used : 1) Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1 2) I use this with LoopMIDI 3) SAVIHost sett so on […]
Show full quote

Good , I report you this information ) I used :
1) Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1
2) I use this with LoopMIDI
3) SAVIHost sett so on image
all this settings on screen , file WinMultMIDI-1.png not variable , but next settings file WinMultMIDI-2.png is variable , so here it is plugin freeze , if I do reselect other synthesizer port on second screen ) , that's why I think what you need fix this bug )

Test result:
There is absolutely no problem when LoopMidi and SAVIHost are not involved. After 8 hours continuous playback I can still switch between normal WinMM Output ports such as Audigy HW Synth port A and MS GS Soft Synth.
So it seems the problem is related to eiher SAVIHost or LoopMidi and has nothing to do with WinMM Multiport VSTi. Can you confirm this?

Roland User wrote on 2026-07-25, 15:17:

Munt bug https://www.mediafire.com/file/52wejw1bur3fyd … nt_bug.avi/file

Why do you think this is a Munt bug? I'm absolutely sure that this visual glitch has nothing to do with Munt/MuntVSTi.

Falcosoft wrote on 2026-07-25, 17:21:

Test result:
There is absolutely no problem when LoopMidi and SAVIHost are not involved. After 8 hours continuous playback I can still switch between normal WinMM Output ports such as Audigy HW Synth port A and MS GS Soft Synth.
So it seems the problem is related to eiher SAVIHost or LoopMidi and has nothing to do with WinMM Multiport VSTi. Can you confirm this?

Hm interest , maybe you right that problem with virtual devices , at least I can not exclude this )

Falcosoft wrote on 2026-07-25, 17:27:

Why do you think this is a Munt bug? I'm absolutely sure that this visual glitch has nothing to do with Munt/MuntVSTi.

I not sayd that this bug only MUNT , I sayd that this bug MT32edit4v.dll , I think that problem in this addon , that's why and offer you connect with author of MT32edit4v.dll that learn cause and maybe fix bug ) if I not use patch editor , this bug absent )
Why I firstly sayd :

also if trying edit patches , on screen last screenprint , whtich can not put away and one method whitch help away this screenpint , restart MUNT

next I sayd :

What ? You want sayd what adhesion contours to screen before close or restart MUNT this not high priority task ? You understand what now was sayd ? Plugin and components for plugin must work so what not leave artefacts on screen in other application and Windows GUI

and all this was about patch editor mode

This bug only patch editor and you can not this deny , this repeatable only if I select or try get help / tip on poly mode , on scereen watermark only from show tips or help messages )
how you can see , bug only in zone of patch editor , not in MUNT zone
That's why , I ask you , connect with author editor for MUNT , and please , help him fix this bug )
Patch editor , is good , but bug need fix )

Roland User wrote on 2026-07-26, 12:33:

This bug only patch editor and you can not this deny , this repeatable only if I select or try get help / tip on poly mode , on […]
Show full quote

This bug only patch editor and you can not this deny , this repeatable only if I select or try get help / tip on poly mode , on scereen watermark only from show tips or help messages )
how you can see , bug only in zone of patch editor , not in MUNT zone
That's why , I ask you , connect with author editor for MUNT , and please , help him fix this bug )
Patch editor , is good , but bug need fix )

Hi,
You have already opened an issue ticket on GitHub so MusicallyInspired most likely has already been notified about it. He can decide when he will have free time to fix it. If he wants some help about troubleshooting the issue he knows where he can find me.

Good , I very hope what this will fixed ) , because I known that it happens what author start project and release 1-2 versions and all , project abandoned , and if this , so will sad , because idea very very good )

God, his English is as insufferable as it was a year ago... Some things never change.

EmperorGrieferus wrote on Yesterday, 13:30:

God, his English is as insufferable as it was a year ago... Some things never change.

Yes , I write how can , maybe my hard reading and understanding , but this my level proficiency... I do not use English often in my life , that's why level as is.
And one more thing , I trying write maximum simple , not use all the nuances of the language , instead I trying write about target as can more simply languarge and transmite a thought , but not seem like something I'm not )

Hi Zoltan )
I'm all still think about your position... you are missing out very importand moment.. if you was make how I offer , this can was be not only for 1 channel = 1 synthseizer , this can was be and 1 channel = 1 copy synthesizer = 1 sysex insert per channel , what tihis can do to user ? You canmentally imagine MIDI file in whitch 16 channels and 1 channels = 1 instrumet = 1 effect , well how ? Maybe have sense expand your WinMM Multi Port VSTi up to 16 ports ? )

The amount of patience Zoltan has is mind boggling...

appiah4 wrote on Today, 07:42:

The amount of patience Zoltan has is mind boggling...

When I used Windows XP , I not think about this because selct MIDI device was very easy , but when I migrate to Windows 7 , so I learn what MIDi devices very very confused and because I started use third party applications for select MIDI devices in MIDI Maper and WMP , after this I start see what this no always this work correctly , for example... in system available devices ;
MIDI Device 0
MIDI Device 1
MIDI Device 2
MIDI Device 3
and I set MIDI Device 3 , but real was selected MIDI Device 1 and something after this I found CoolSoft VirtualMIDISynth , do modify via Resource Hacker this , and recive work so as need me , but this still not comfort , I wanted do select MIDI devie as this was in Windows XP , on fly... and in this thime I found FSMP and plugin WinMM Multi Port VSTi and this very very made me happy ) , but because in this time was developing YAMAHA TyRUS (this my name and mean Ty from Tyros , RUS from Russian) , if I living in Germany , project was be named as TyGER (Ty from Tyros , GER from Germany) I wanted get best GS synthesizer , in fact I wanted get Roland SoundCanvs VA with realistic patch tones , author TyRUS in the future Vampire Wlad Rever sayd to me what he want do all in 2 GB bank , but by this time I have i7-2600K with 24 GB RAM , next this size was expand to 32 GB , and next this was replace to i7-6950X with 64 GB RAM , so here it is I thought and continue thougting , what need make very very big bank up to 8 GB , but in 32 bit version plugin this inposible and I think what need 4 partial of synthesizer each of the bottom up to 2 GB , and that is why I firstly asked Zoltan expand WinMM Multi Port VSTi , exactly after that in WinMM Multi Port VSTi appeared custom mask 1/2/3/4/5/6/7/8/9/10/11/12/13/14/15/16 , firstly I thinked what this will for YAMAHA project , but next I seen what YAMAHA project on whitch I very very hoped is dead , but with this time I understanding all power WinMM Multi Port VSTi , that is why I and try convince Zoltan expand up to maximum his plugin make not simply plugin for currently synthesizers from Roland and YAMAHA , but do make make powerfull MIDI Router for any combinations synhesizers with up to 16 individual channels if 1 port = 1 synth = 1 channel = 1 insert effect or up to 256 channels ) and this idea not leave my )

You do realize that at this point you are basically using Zoltan as basically a consultant as well as an employee of your pet project with your questions and demands, right? I've been following your exchange for basically years and 90% of it amounts to Zoltan explaining to you why what you are saying/asking is wrong/impossible. In all honesty, I'd have told you off countless times by now even if you were paying me for my time.. That is all I have to say.

appiah4 wrote on Today, 09:38:

You do realize that at this point you are basically using Zoltan as basically a consultant as well as an employee of your pet project with your questions and demands, right? I've been following your exchange for basically years and 90% of it amounts to Zoltan explaining to you why what you are saying/asking is wrong/impossible. In all honesty, I'd have told you off countless times by now even if you were paying me for my time.. That is all I have to say.

Yes , I very good understand what I not have expirence and learn , that is why I ask all the person who known very very more then I , my expirence from MIDI this simply revoice and playback MIDI files in Windows or MIDI music from games , I not known very very more details , that is why I so frequency ask Zoltan about my offers and my wants about extend plugins whitch me liked , I really want see solution as best solution of world )

All in all I will do make this router on one's own , but me very not like when developer whitch have all , and this developer so resisting offer which do his product better