Roland User wrote on Yesterday, 19:20:

All in all I will do make this router on one's own , but me very not like when developer whitch have all , and this developer so resisting offer which do his product better

And I do not like when someone is so selfish and narrow minded that he simply cannot understand that what he thinks to be better can be worse for someone else. I'm really curious what you would do in the opposite situation.
Let's play with the unlikely idea that you created a 16 -port router for your own needs and then I would write to you:

"Hey Roland User,
Remove the unnecessary 16 ports since my Midi Player only needs 64-channel/ 4-ports and this would make the interface easier to handle and even work on my legacy PC with 1024x768 resolution.
There are no known classic Midi files with more than 64-channels which makes your cluttered user interface hard to understand. Also please remove the unnecessary reset options since my Midi Player already contains all of them so they are completely redundant. Please, make these changes urgently so your plugin can be better."

You have to realize that no one wants to spend hours of work on his own hobby project in order to implement the ideas of someone else when he genuinely does not like those ideas.
If you fail to understand this then we finished here.

Zoltan , this example not correct , if only I write to you exactly as you showed , so this was be stupid , then I very good understand you reject , but my offer this not cut functional , a extend functional , now I try make MIDI Router , source code https://www.mediafire.com/file/no6hds0sumxqrm3/1.pas/file , but in this on Pascal ABC , I recive next not impenetrable problem , so as this work , always use Direct Music interface , and this can not set two Drum channel , and can not transmit sysex for inserting effects , I not known what do for use WinMM system
I'm trying contact you for get extend version WinMM Multi Port VSTi , I'm trying ask AI for fix my app , but all it doesn't work , you has source code your WinMM Multi Port VSTi , I trying make its analogue , but this can not do it
I have never before not ask delete functional , but I always ask extend functional
If keep your example , so this as if you have only Roland MT-32 and because this module have channels 2-10 , do ask remove channles 1 and 11-16 , this stupid
ultimately if consider what you formulated , so this fix simply do scrolling channels , limit window size , and do scrolling bar for change from port 1 to port 16
Thus you firstly see only 4 MIDI ports , but if you need more , you do scroling also as when do select MIDI device in list , and do use as many ports as you need
For example , you can see what make select MIDI devices per port , also you can do select quantity MIDI ports or MIDI channles per ports for full routed MIDI steeaming )

Roland User wrote on Yesterday, 23:31:

Zoltan , this example not correct , if only I write to you exactly as you showed , so this was be stupid , then I very good understand you reject , but my offer this not cut functional , a extend functional , now I try make MIDI Router , source code ...

It seems that you really failed to understand this:

You have to realize that no one wants to spend hours of work on his own hobby project in order to implement the ideas of someone else when he genuinely does not like those ideas.

The analogy was not about adding or deleting. It was about how one would react when the ideas differ about what is better or worse. What you consider better for me is just more work for a more cluttered and unnecessarily complex user interface that no one would like or need except you.

Why you think what interface will cluttered?
Why you think what simply duplicate ready-made blocks-program this long work ?
If developer known source code , this do very easier , for this enough add id for other ports and add scroll bar for not do interface bigger
I really this can not understand , so small wish , and so long time discute about this...

Roland User wrote on 42 minutes ago:

Why you think what interface will cluttered? Why you think what simply duplicate ready-made blocks-program this long work ? If […]
Show full quote

Why you think what interface will cluttered?
Why you think what simply duplicate ready-made blocks-program this long work ?
If developer known source code , this do very easier , for this enough add id for other ports and add scroll bar for not do interface bigger
I really this can not understand

I also cannot understand you. I do not want to talk about this topic anymore.
Please , leave me alone.

Zoltan , I have no one else to turn to , because absent analog your project , I can asking you make for me version WinMM Multi Port VSTi , or ask you help me make on Pascal ABC analogue application for work with same functional

Roland User wrote on 35 minutes ago:

Zoltan , I have no one else to turn to , because absent analog your project , I can asking you make for me version WinMM Multi Port VSTi , or ask you help me make on Pascal ABC analogue application for work with same functional

Sincerely I do not care and I have no time for this anyway.
Bye.