Reply 20 of 26, by Jo22
- Rank
- l33t++
badmojo wrote on Today, 10:32:Kekkula wrote on Yesterday, 15:51:Sorry but meaning of this thread is not to start any ai discussion.
Too late 😅
My hope is that over time the insta-rage will die down and AI discussions can happen thoughtfully wherever they appears on the forum - it's bound to keep coming up.
Oh well. Ironically, it's like with AI itself. Once the spirit is out of the bottle.. 😟
Cyberdyne wrote on Yesterday, 15:25:Still do not understand the viceral hate of fruits of AI. Soon we will have allmost all modern drivers for DOS and Windows 3.1x and 9x. Wtf is the harm?
That's true and it makes me feel a bit melancholic, to be honest.
On one hand, AI can assist driver development such as writting USB 3 drivers (xhci98) or graphics drivers (Velocity9x) for Windows 9x.
Since these are rather large projects that would take years to be developed by a single person all alone.
Here, I see the use, the chance. AI/LLM is like a smart compiler/IDE that completes/fixes code.
It's like the computer aboard the NCC-1701D which gives precise answers to precise questions.
It's used as an assistant that helps but doesn't replace human thinking.
The crew members can understand/fix/repair the computer.
By contrast, in TNG episode about planet Aldea, the Custodian is a computer that controlles everything in daily life but the Aldeans have totally forgotten how it works.
They entrust the computer to handle everything for them, so they don't need to know about the details.
So we see that on other hand, careless use of AI leads to AI slop and people don't learn anything by just using it.
And that's a bit saddening, because the retro/vintage computing scene always had been a counter culture to the mainstream.
It was about fixing beloved things and taking care of them, there was an emotional bond involved.
People into, say, the C64 hobby weren't mere consumers, video game players or users
but also dedicated coders, chip music musicians, pixel artists and modders.
That sort of geek culture was a charming, it gave people something to hold onto. Like an anchor in our modern days.
If AI now starts to invade this safe space, too, then what happens to these people?
Will they fight AI, embrace AI or simply leave the scene behind? I don't know, but it worries me.
I mean, I myself just recently asked an LLM about how DirectDraw (DirectX 2) could be ported back to Windows 3.1+Win32s.
The LLM provided me with a highly complex code for an DDraw to WinG wrapper.
I didn't test it yet, but most of it seemed plausible at first glance.
I should be happy now; after all, I opened a thread about that topic once and lacked the knowledge to do it myself.
Which I still do lack, by the way. And that saddens me a bit.
I could try to learn it, but I'm already superflous in my own project.
That draws the point what the point of all this is.
Why keeping the old technology alive and still improve it via dedicated people if AI makes everything exchangeable?
Retro/vintage computing used to be about a society of kind weirdos who did strange, yet charming stuff.
Like grandmas who did knitting on their rocker chair.
The demoscene comes to mind. It's amazing if human beings can do the sheer impossible on limited hardware.
But if an AI does it in no time, on demand, then what does this to the psyche of creative people?
Also, what about history? Until now, everything was mostly human made.
People into retro/vintage hobby either wrote new software for old stuff or released patches for the vintage software.
But what if AI now disassembles whole vintage software on the fly, adds new 21st century features and re-assembles it in no time?
Then where's the point to still explore an 1984 era Unix or to release patches for it that otherwise had needed lots of dedication?
Under normal circumstance the community would be happy and amazed that the old OS was updated by a fellow computer fan.
The community would talk about it and discuss how it was done, what else could be improved.
Edit: To go back on topic: I remember reading that some other places on the web do discuss using "AI tags".
HaD has an "llm-assisted" tag, for example. Maybe something like this could be applied here?
So that perhaps threads/topics containing AI/LLM could be excluded from view/search?
"Time, it seems, doesn't flow. For some it's fast, for some it's slow.
In what to one race is no time at all, another race can rise and fall..." - The Minstrel
//My video channel//