VOGONS


Which system for AWE64?

Topic actions

First post, by SquallStrife

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Hey guys, long time no see! 😀

I finally found an AWE64 Gold at the "right" price. Which system you reckon I should add it to?

My 486 rig or Pentium MMX rig? I currently have a CT2800 and MPU-IPC-T in the 486, and a CMI8330 in the MMX rig.

I don't think it'd belong on my P3 rig, it has a GameTheater XP in it, running the bundled Yamaha SWXG software.

As a side note, I still want a SC-55, but the prices on eBay seem like too much. Is there anywhere else that lists them semi-regularly?

VogonsDrivers.com | Link | News Thread

Reply 1 of 12, by Mystery

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

I'd put it in the MMX system.
The AWE64 was released in late 1996 and the MMX CPUs were released from early '95 to mid '97, so they fit into the same timeframe.

As for the SC-55, try to find the ones that are being auctioned off. You'll have to be more patient, but they can end up half as expensive as the buy-it-now 55's from Japan.

::42::

Reply 2 of 12, by ratfink

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Try the classified section on queststudios 😉.

Reply 3 of 12, by TheMAN

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

if you don't install the software wavetable drivers (which gave the AWE64 the "64" capabilities), then it will run on a 486... otherwise you do need a Pentium class machine to make it work... without the software, the AWE64 is essentially an updated AWE32

Reply 4 of 12, by SquallStrife

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Thanks guys, I figured it would probably work in them both, I just wondered which it would feel more "at home" in. So thanks mystery! 😀

VogonsDrivers.com | Link | News Thread

Reply 5 of 12, by sliderider

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
TheMAN wrote:

if you don't install the software wavetable drivers (which gave the AWE64 the "64" capabilities), then it will run on a 486... otherwise you do need a Pentium class machine to make it work... without the software, the AWE64 is essentially an updated AWE32

If you're going to use it like an AWE32, then you should use a real AWE32. An AWE64 would be wasted in a 486 if you can't use the features that distinguish it from an AWE32.

Reply 6 of 12, by DonutKing

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

The AWE64 has a better SNR and unlike the AWE32, the AWE64 doesn't have the hanging note bug if you use it to drive an external MIDI synth. So there is a reason to use it in a pre-Pentium class machine over an AWE32.

Reply 7 of 12, by Mau1wurf1977

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Yea in combination with a SC-55 or other external General MIDI module, the AWE64 is an awesome companion.

Last edited by Mau1wurf1977 on 2011-11-22, 00:06. Edited 1 time in total.

Reply 8 of 12, by leileilol

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

I don't think I remember the WaveSynth working on Cyrix6x86 either.

So Cyrix is out

apsosig.png
long live PCem

Reply 9 of 12, by bushwack

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

I have a Awe64 Gold in my Pentium 200mmx and I have to say I'm happy with it. Most all my games are 1995+ and I'm not a MIDI junky like some folks here so it fits my bill just fine.

Reply 10 of 12, by TheMAN

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
DonutKing wrote:

The AWE64 has a better SNR and unlike the AWE32, the AWE64 doesn't have the hanging note bug if you use it to drive an external MIDI synth. So there is a reason to use it in a pre-Pentium class machine over an AWE32.

the regular AWE64s have just about the same SNR as the AWE32s because they used the same mixer chips... only the AWE64 Gold was better

Reply 11 of 12, by DonutKing

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

well I have an AWE64 Value and it sounds better than my AWE32, (no cracks/pops in Halloween Harry and other tracker based games) but I'm sure the gold is even better.

If you are squeamish, don't prod the beach rubble.

Reply 12 of 12, by TheMAN

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

you must have an earlier AWE32 then because I have one of the later ones that used the same mixer chip as the AWE64.... sounds about the same