VOGONS


First post, by Anonymous Coward

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

I currently own the following cards:

-SB 1.5 with V2.00 DSP upgrade & CMS chips
-SB 2.0 with CMS chips

Is there any advantage to using one card over the other? Are they functionally identical?

I kind of like the look of the SB 1.5 because it matches my 8086 system a little better, but if the SB 2.0 has some extra functionality I would probably rather go with that.

"Will the highways on the internets become more few?" -Gee Dubya
V'Ger XT|Upgraded AT|Ultimate 386|Super VL/EISA 486|SMP VL/EISA Pentium

Reply 1 of 4, by Great Hierophant

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
Anonymous Coward wrote:
I currently own the following cards: […]
Show full quote

I currently own the following cards:

-SB 1.5 with V2.00 DSP upgrade & CMS chips
-SB 2.0 with CMS chips

Is there any advantage to using one card over the other? Are they functionally identical?

I kind of like the look of the SB 1.5 because it matches my 8086 system a little better, but if the SB 2.0 has some extra functionality I would probably rather go with that.

SB 2.0 (DSP 2.01) can output 8-bit digital sound samples in mono at 44,100kHz, SB 1.5 (assuming a DSP 2.00) can only do that at 22,050kHz. Audio output in general sounds a bit cleaner on the 2.0. On the other hand, the 2.0 has fewer I/O options than the 1.5.

http://nerdlypleasures.blogspot.com/ - Nerdly Pleasures - My Retro Gaming, Computing & Tech Blog

Reply 3 of 4, by Anonymous Coward

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

I'll have to look into this -5V issue on my 486 system (which is using an ATX power supply). I noticed issues with certain soundcards not working.

"Will the highways on the internets become more few?" -Gee Dubya
V'Ger XT|Upgraded AT|Ultimate 386|Super VL/EISA 486|SMP VL/EISA Pentium