VOGONS


First post, by Sandi1987

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

AMD Sempron 3100+, 512 MB RAM, ATI Radeon 9550. Is it good for Windows 98/XP for old games? Should i install Windows 95 instead 98?

Reply 1 of 11, by kanecvr

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Theoretically it's a winxp computer. Should be good for win98 tough.

Reply 2 of 11, by leileilol

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Slip in a Rage128 or a GeforceFX *briefly vomits* and it might be.

apsosig.png
long live PCem

Reply 3 of 11, by Stermy57

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie
Sandi1987 wrote:

AMD Sempron 3100+, 512 MB RAM, ATI Radeon 9550. Is it good for Windows 98/XP for old games? Should i install Windows 95 instead 98?

In my opinion it's a good platform, the main question is what kind of games are you looking for?
Resolution's display?
In this way it will be more easy 😀

Reply 4 of 11, by Jade Falcon

User metadata
Rank BANNED
Rank
BANNED
Sandi1987 wrote:

AMD Sempron 3100+, 512 MB RAM, ATI Radeon 9550. Is it good for Windows 98/XP for old games? Should i install Windows 95 instead 98?

With 512mv of ram 95 will not play well. Just install 2k and call it a day

Reply 5 of 11, by clueless1

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

98SE is probably better for gaming. OP, what games are you looking to play?

The more I learn, the more I realize how much I don't know.
OPL3 FM vs. Roland MT-32 vs. General MIDI DOS Game Comparison
Let's benchmark our systems with cache disabled
DOS PCI Graphics Card Benchmarks

Reply 6 of 11, by deleted_Rc

User metadata
Jade Falcon wrote:
Sandi1987 wrote:

AMD Sempron 3100+, 512 MB RAM, ATI Radeon 9550. Is it good for Windows 98/XP for old games? Should i install Windows 95 instead 98?

With 512mv of ram 95 will not play well. Just install 2k and call it a day

imo 9x has better support/compability for older games then 2k and newer.

also stick to a ATI consider a ATI rage rather then a Geforce.

Reply 7 of 11, by Koltoroc

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
leileilol wrote:

Slip in a Rage128 or a GeforceFX *briefly vomits* and it might be.

fuck no. Socket 754 has pretty much only AGP 8x compatible boards and the rage 128 is AGP 3.3V only. Assuming it even fits (manufacturers using universal keying against the standard) it will fry the board.

Geforce FX is fine though.

Reply 8 of 11, by LHN91

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

I'd probably throw ME on that and go to town with it - it'd be really good as is for late 9x gaming.

Reply 9 of 11, by leileilol

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
Koltoroc wrote:

fuck no. Socket 754 has pretty much only AGP 8x compatible boards and the rage 128 is AGP 3.3V only. Assuming it even fits (manufacturers using universal keying against the standard) it will fry the board.

It has SmartGART and i've had no issues using one in a 4x-only 1.5v board. (mine does at least)

apsosig.png
long live PCem

Reply 10 of 11, by .legaCy

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

If the motherboard has Windows 98 you should be good to go,otherwise you can install Windows XP SP1(but some games like pod racer will not work), just add a Aureal Vortex2 soundcard and enjoy.
Should be pretty good windows 98 and late dos games machine.

Reply 11 of 11, by firage

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
leileilol wrote:
Koltoroc wrote:

fuck no. Socket 754 has pretty much only AGP 8x compatible boards and the rage 128 is AGP 3.3V only. Assuming it even fits (manufacturers using universal keying against the standard) it will fry the board.

It has SmartGART and i've had no issues using one in a 4x-only 1.5v board. (mine does at least)

The attachment sticklers.gif is no longer available

http://www.playtool.com/pages/agpcompat/agp.html

Universal AGP 3.0 motherboards seem to be a rare occurence, Universal 1.5V is the norm for 8X. Rage cards are mostly 3.3V, Rage 128 Pro is the exception being Universal. According to those guys.

My big-red-switch 486