VOGONS


First post, by Tempest

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

I have a IBM PS/Valuepoint 433SX/S (a 486 SX) and an IBM Personal Computer 350 (Pentium 200). I want to set each of these systems up for gaming, but I'm having trouble figuring out which video and sound card should go in each system. Here's what they currently have:

IBM PS/Valuepoint
----------------------
Graphics: S3 86C805 (built in)
Sound: Ensoniq Soundscape Opus

IBM Personal Computer 350
---------------------------------
Graphics: Matrox Millennium MGA (card) or S3 Trio64V+ (built in) - I can use either, current using the Millennium
Sound: Soundblaster Awe32 + Roland MT-32

I also have a spare Matrox Millennium 2 (576-04) card and a Geforce2 MX400 64MB PCI VGA. How should I allocate these cards? Given that I'm going for late 80's/early 90's on the 486 and mid-90's/early 2000's on the Pentium, I'm thinking this:

IBM PS/Valuepoint
----------------------
Graphics: S3 86C805 (built in) or Matrox Millennium MGA (not sure which would be better)
Sound: Soundblaster Awe32 + Roland MT-32 (the Roland is really for Sierra games)

IBM Personal Computer 350
---------------------------------
Graphics: Geforce2 MX400 64MB PCI VGA
Sound: Ensoniq Soundscape Opus

Does that sound reasonable?

--- AtariProtos.com ---
For when excellence and burnished fineries need to gently visit the warmth of your tablery

Reply 1 of 13, by lazibayer

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

You can't use Millennium in PS 433SX. It's a PCI card and PS 433SX can only take VL/ISA cards. 86C805 isn't too shabby for DOS games.
I heard matrox cards being not ideal for DOS gaming. TNT2 M64 is a good balance between price and performance. Not sure about MX400.

Reply 2 of 13, by Tempest

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Huh, I didn't know that. Well I guess the built in video on the 486 will do then.

Speaking of which, does anyone know why the disk drive and cd rom in the Valuepoint won't sit flush with the front of the case? I thought maybe I had them in wrong but from the pictures I've seen on the net it would appear that I'm not the only one with this problem.

--- AtariProtos.com ---
For when excellence and burnished fineries need to gently visit the warmth of your tablery

Reply 3 of 13, by Tempest

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

So would the Geforce2 MX400 be way overkill for a Pentium 200? Overkill I don't mind, but will it have detrimental performance on DOS games or anything like that?

--- AtariProtos.com ---
For when excellence and burnished fineries need to gently visit the warmth of your tablery

Reply 4 of 13, by clueless1

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
Tempest wrote:

So would the Geforce2 MX400 be way overkill for a Pentium 200? Overkill I don't mind, but will it have detrimental performance on DOS games or anything like that?

No, it won't be overkill. Early nvidia chips from TNT to GF3 are extremely fast and compatible in DOS games despite not being period correct.

Also, why is the MT-32 on the P200? Games that support MT-32 generally need a 386 or 486 to run without speed issues.

Personally, I would avoid the Millennium 1 and 2 if you're primarily playing DOS games. I've seen lots of weird compatibility issues with Millenniums and DOS games. It's a great card for Win95, though.

The more I learn, the more I realize how much I don't know.
OPL3 FM vs. Roland MT-32 vs. General MIDI DOS Game Comparison
Let's benchmark our systems with cache disabled
DOS PCI Graphics Card Benchmarks

Reply 5 of 13, by gdjacobs

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

A P200 (MMX or not) can throttle effectively down to 386DX speeds using SETMUL.

All hail the Great Capacitor Brand Finder

Reply 6 of 13, by clueless1

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
gdjacobs wrote:

A P200 (MMX or not) can throttle effectively down to 386DX speeds using SETMUL.

You're preaching to the choir. But if you had a 486sx-33 and a P200, which would you put the MT-32 on?

The more I learn, the more I realize how much I don't know.
OPL3 FM vs. Roland MT-32 vs. General MIDI DOS Game Comparison
Let's benchmark our systems with cache disabled
DOS PCI Graphics Card Benchmarks

Reply 7 of 13, by Tempest

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
clueless1 wrote:
Tempest wrote:

Also, why is the MT-32 on the P200? Games that support MT-32 generally need a 386 or 486 to run without speed issues.

That's why I'm going to move it to the 486 and put the soundscape opus in the Pentium. When I set them up originally I didn't know better. 😀

IBM PS/Valuepoint
----------------------
Graphics: S3 86C805 (built in)
Sound: Soundblaster Awe32 + Roland MT-32

IBM Personal Computer 350
---------------------------------
Graphics: Geforce2 MX400 64MB PCI VGA
Sound: Ensoniq Soundscape Opus

Is here any reason (or way) to upgrade the 486SX to a DX? IIRC 3D games like Doom needed the DX, but I suppose I could always play those on the Pentium 200.

--- AtariProtos.com ---
For when excellence and burnished fineries need to gently visit the warmth of your tablery

Reply 8 of 13, by clueless1

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
Tempest wrote:

Is here any reason (or way) to upgrade the 486SX to a DX? IIRC 3D games like Doom needed the DX, but I suppose I could always play those on the Pentium 200.

Doom doesn't take advantage of the math co-processor, so it should perform the same on an SX or DX (you're probably thinking of 16 vs 32 bit bus -- Doom requires 32 bit, which includes all 486's). I think any game that might take advantage of or require a DX would run way better on the P200, as you say. I'm thinking Quake, not sure what else off the top of my head.

The more I learn, the more I realize how much I don't know.
OPL3 FM vs. Roland MT-32 vs. General MIDI DOS Game Comparison
Let's benchmark our systems with cache disabled
DOS PCI Graphics Card Benchmarks

Reply 9 of 13, by Tempest

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
clueless1 wrote:

Doom doesn't take advantage of the math co-processor, so it should perform the same on an SX or DX (you're probably thinking of 16 vs 32 bit bus -- Doom requires 32 bit, which includes all 486's).

Bah you're right. I'm not thinking. I remember all those kids in college trying to run Doom on their 386's and it failing miserably.

--- AtariProtos.com ---
For when excellence and burnished fineries need to gently visit the warmth of your tablery

Reply 10 of 13, by gdjacobs

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
clueless1 wrote:
gdjacobs wrote:

A P200 (MMX or not) can throttle effectively down to 386DX speeds using SETMUL.

You're preaching to the choir. But if you had a 486sx-33 and a P200, which would you put the MT-32 on?

Hey, I didn't recognize your ever changing avatar!

All hail the Great Capacitor Brand Finder

Reply 11 of 13, by jade_angel

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

I wouldn't bother upgrading from an SX/33 to a DX/33, no. If I were going to swap that chip out, I'd go with a DX4/100 or 5x86/133, or I'd leave it as-is - and with the P200, leaving it seems to make sense.

Main Box: Macbook Pro M2 Max
Alas, I'm down to emulation.

Reply 12 of 13, by Tempest

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Yeah the Valuepoint has a Pentium overdrive socket, but I'm going to leave it the way it is since I have the P200.

Now I just need to create a new Autoexec.bat and Config,sys. It's been a looooong time since I've had to do that. 😀

--- AtariProtos.com ---
For when excellence and burnished fineries need to gently visit the warmth of your tablery

Reply 13 of 13, by clueless1

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
gdjacobs wrote:
clueless1 wrote:
gdjacobs wrote:

A P200 (MMX or not) can throttle effectively down to 386DX speeds using SETMUL.

You're preaching to the choir. But if you had a 486sx-33 and a P200, which would you put the MT-32 on?

Hey, I didn't recognize your ever changing avatar!

Ha! I've decided to let my avatar represent the game I'm currently playing. This one is my lead character in Realms of Arkania I.

The more I learn, the more I realize how much I don't know.
OPL3 FM vs. Roland MT-32 vs. General MIDI DOS Game Comparison
Let's benchmark our systems with cache disabled
DOS PCI Graphics Card Benchmarks