Geforce256 driver performance

Discussion about old graphics cards, monitors and video related things.

Geforce256 driver performance

Postby cxm717 » 2019-4-19 @ 19:50

Just like my driver performance threads for the Rage 128 and TNT2. The card I used is a Creative Geforce256 (SDR 120/166).

The test setups I used were: P3/800EB on an OR840 board with 512MB of 800MHz RDRAM and a K6-3 450 in an Asus P5A-B with 128MB of PC100@CL2. I used a sound blaster live in both, using the VXD drivers.

I'm going to update these threads with some 1999 game results later. I split up the tests like this because it takes a while to run these tests and didn't want to do it all at once (the heretic2 timedemo takes something like 15 minutes for just 1 run.. and that is 3 runs for each resolution and driver). I could also post some pics of these setups if anyone is interested.

P3 results:
gf256drv93800.png


K6-3 results:
gf256drvk63450.png
User avatar
cxm717
Member
 
Posts: 169
Joined: 2017-11-21 @ 04:17

Re: Geforce256 driver performance

Postby silikone » 2019-4-20 @ 19:37

The 1999 driver holds up surprisingly well.
What's causing Unreal to not function on anything else?
Do not refrain from refusing to stop hindering yourself from the opposite of watching nothing other than that which is by no means porn.
User avatar
silikone
Member
 
Posts: 259
Joined: 2012-3-21 @ 19:53

Re: Geforce256 driver performance

Postby The Serpent Rider » 2019-4-20 @ 22:25

Probably it's DLL for original Unreal. Latest unofficial patch will fix that.
User avatar
The Serpent Rider
Oldbie
 
Posts: 1699
Joined: 2017-3-25 @ 19:07
Location: Stagnant Demesne

Re: Geforce256 driver performance

Postby cxm717 » 2019-5-02 @ 23:31

I think unreal was crashing because there are too many GL extensions. After a crash it would always show this in the log file:

unreallog.png
User avatar
cxm717
Member
 
Posts: 169
Joined: 2017-11-21 @ 04:17

Re: Geforce256 driver performance

Postby silikone » 2019-5-04 @ 21:44

Ah yes, the good old extension string overflow.
NVIDIA appears to employ extension limits for certain old applications automatically in their modern drivers. Haven't been so lucky with Intel.
Do not refrain from refusing to stop hindering yourself from the opposite of watching nothing other than that which is by no means porn.
User avatar
silikone
Member
 
Posts: 259
Joined: 2012-3-21 @ 19:53

Re: Geforce256 driver performance

Postby leileilol » 2019-5-04 @ 21:52

No big loss as Epic's own OpenGLDrv was a very feature incomplete and buggy mess anyway. No overbrights, no volumetric dog, no detail textures, etc. D3DDrv was preferred for nVidia then.

Nvidia's extension wanking in 2001 broke a lot of stuff including some professional applications.
by the way, DOSBox is not for running Windows 9x
User avatar
leileilol
l33t++
 
Posts: 9827
Joined: 2006-12-16 @ 18:03

Re: Geforce256 driver performance

Postby appiah4 » 2019-5-04 @ 22:59

I have nothing but respect for you, OP. First Rage128 now this. I can only hope you do this with a Matrox G400 as well.
A500:Rev6|+512K|ACA500+|C1084S
i386:Am386SX25|4M|GD5402|ES688
i486:U5S33|8M|GD5428|YMF719|DB-S2
i586:P133|32M|T64+/MX2|V1|CT3980/32M
i686:K6-2/400|128M|Rage|V2|CT4520/32M
S370:P3-1200|384M|GF4-4200|MX300
S754:A3700+|2G|X1950PRO|SB0350
User avatar
appiah4
l33t
 
Posts: 4181
Joined: 2017-2-19 @ 07:36

Re: Geforce256 driver performance

Postby cxm717 » 2019-5-05 @ 06:11

appiah4 wrote:I have nothing but respect for you, OP. First Rage128 now this. I can only hope you do this with a Matrox G400 as well.


Thanks, next one was going to be either Voodoo3 or G400.
User avatar
cxm717
Member
 
Posts: 169
Joined: 2017-11-21 @ 04:17

Re: Geforce256 driver performance

Postby bofh.fromhell » 2019-5-05 @ 14:43

cxm717 wrote:
appiah4 wrote:I have nothing but respect for you, OP. First Rage128 now this. I can only hope you do this with a Matrox G400 as well.


Thanks, next one was going to be either Voodoo3 or G400.


Just wanted to say thanks for the huge work =)
And yea, G400 would be nice.
I expect a fairly huge performance development through the driver revisions.
User avatar
bofh.fromhell
Member
 
Posts: 129
Joined: 2019-2-09 @ 16:11

Re: Geforce256 driver performance

Postby swaaye » 2019-5-05 @ 19:27

With G400, I wonder about the visual differences between TurboGL and the full ICD. I'm curious if they obviously cut corners to run faster. Review sites didn't really look at image quality back then.
swaaye
Moderator
 
Posts: 7494
Joined: 2002-7-22 @ 21:24
Location: WI, USA

Re: Geforce256 driver performance

Postby appiah4 » 2019-5-05 @ 20:10

swaaye wrote:With G400, I wonder about the visual differences between TurboGL and the full ICD. I'm curious if they obviously cut corners to run faster. Review sites didn't really look at image quality back then.


Yeah, the move from TurboGL to ICD really hit Quake 3 performance for examble, by around 15-20%, so I am wondering what changed visually as well as framerate-wise etc.
A500:Rev6|+512K|ACA500+|C1084S
i386:Am386SX25|4M|GD5402|ES688
i486:U5S33|8M|GD5428|YMF719|DB-S2
i586:P133|32M|T64+/MX2|V1|CT3980/32M
i686:K6-2/400|128M|Rage|V2|CT4520/32M
S370:P3-1200|384M|GF4-4200|MX300
S754:A3700+|2G|X1950PRO|SB0350
User avatar
appiah4
l33t
 
Posts: 4181
Joined: 2017-2-19 @ 07:36

Re: Geforce256 driver performance

Postby cxm717 » 2019-5-05 @ 20:44

Well, I did pick up a capture card the other day. I could capture some video from different driver versions.
User avatar
cxm717
Member
 
Posts: 169
Joined: 2017-11-21 @ 04:17

Re: Geforce256 driver performance

Postby cxm717 » 2019-5-05 @ 20:46

Here are the 1999 game results on the P3/800:

99gf256drv93800.png
User avatar
cxm717
Member
 
Posts: 169
Joined: 2017-11-21 @ 04:17

Re: Geforce256 driver performance

Postby silikone » 2019-5-06 @ 00:31

leileilol wrote:No big loss as Epic's own OpenGLDrv was a very feature incomplete and buggy mess anyway. No overbrights, no volumetric dog, no detail textures, etc. D3DDrv was preferred for nVidia then.

Nvidia's extension wanking in 2001 broke a lot of stuff including some professional applications.

Did Unreal ever have overbrights? I noticed them upon disabling multitexturing in Deus Ex, but U/UT appear to have normalized lighting no matter the renderer I use.
Do not refrain from refusing to stop hindering yourself from the opposite of watching nothing other than that which is by no means porn.
User avatar
silikone
Member
 
Posts: 259
Joined: 2012-3-21 @ 19:53

Re: Geforce256 driver performance

Postby leileilol » 2019-5-06 @ 03:30

Unreal did overbright until that big GlideDrv multitexture update around Sep 98 which pretty much made the game dark (but faster) for Voodoo2 owners since. SoftDrv also overbrighted. Don't think Epic's D3DDrv ever did (though it did do something similar to Quake2 with brightness processing textures instead, IIRC).
by the way, DOSBox is not for running Windows 9x
User avatar
leileilol
l33t++
 
Posts: 9827
Joined: 2006-12-16 @ 18:03

Re: Geforce256 driver performance

Postby appiah4 » 2019-5-06 @ 04:33

Thanks to this thread the process of downgrading my gf/gf2 pcs from 45.23 to 8.05 has started.
A500:Rev6|+512K|ACA500+|C1084S
i386:Am386SX25|4M|GD5402|ES688
i486:U5S33|8M|GD5428|YMF719|DB-S2
i586:P133|32M|T64+/MX2|V1|CT3980/32M
i686:K6-2/400|128M|Rage|V2|CT4520/32M
S370:P3-1200|384M|GF4-4200|MX300
S754:A3700+|2G|X1950PRO|SB0350
User avatar
appiah4
l33t
 
Posts: 4181
Joined: 2017-2-19 @ 07:36

Re: Geforce256 driver performance

Postby bofh.fromhell » 2019-5-06 @ 13:28

Memory fails me as to when nVidia's "Detonator" series of drivers started appearing.
But I remember that every revision of them made my Riva 128 PCI card (Diamond Viper V330) look better and better.
Eventually Quake2 was not only playable, and faster, but also looked better then on the VooDoo I also had.
It was a good day when the VooDoo could be removed and the blurry picture it caused went away.

Later I got the TNT and the card the Detonators were released with.
And the same thing repeated but with a VooDoo2 card.
The TNT image quality was just so much better, and when the performance got close enough to the V2, out it went.
Not to mention the ability, albeit not the performance, to chose higher resolutions and 32 bit colordepth!

I dont think we will ever see a driver evolution like the Detonators again.
If nVidia hadn't started that insane driver development I'm pretty sure they would not be where they are today.
It really put them on the map.
And if ATI had gotten the message and done the same ?
Well they always had really good hardware, but so many times they got let down by bad drivers.
The R200 was the first truly viable card from ATI, it could and really should have been king of the hill at that time.
But ATI took so long to get decent drivers released that the competition got their next generation of cards out !

A little thread ninja perhaps.
But nostalgia reared its head =)
User avatar
bofh.fromhell
Member
 
Posts: 129
Joined: 2019-2-09 @ 16:11


Return to Video

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests