Reply 38020 of 56684, by dionb
- Rank
- l33t++
Ozzuneoj wrote on 2021-02-11, 07:26:Wow! New in box... that's a pretty rare item in that condition. Some nutty person will probably buy it. […]
Arctic wrote on 2021-02-11, 07:09:I dont know where else to post this, I am not gonna bid on this, what do you guys think?
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Sony-GDM-FW900-CRT-M … or/164685875289Wow! New in box... that's a pretty rare item in that condition. Some nutty person will probably buy it.
Having had (and sold) a used one, and made... a lot... I totally don't blame the person for listing it high. People read about it or see it in youtube videos and they simply must have it. Whatever... it pays the bills and funds future projects. 🤣
Honestly, it's a nice display, but the price is mostly hype. Remember, it's nowhere near the newest CRT made, with many (Most? All?) being made before 2001. Later CRTs often have better refresh rates and specs, and the 16:10 ratio of the FW900 is much less useful for retro gaming... plus, when buying used, newer models may have far less usage, since LCDs became much more popular in the mid 2000s and people were replacing CRTs just to save space. Mitsubishi and NEC displays from 2003-2005 have great specs and don't reach the insanely high prices of the FW900. Some of the best will do a maximum of 2048x1536@86Hz, 1600x1200@109Hz, 1024x768@160Hz, etc. At lower refresh rates they are super crisp if they've been taken care of.
Still, the sheer size, sheer visual real estate of a 24" widescreen is something to behold. My last primary PC CRT was a w900, so the FW900's predecessor. Its specs were lower, with max 1600x900@85Hz, but I wasn't complaining. It was perfectly acceptable as a television in my then living room, allowing me to watch HD widescreen content from the sofa, and was fine for desktop work or current (we're talking 2005-2010) gaming. Eventually we moved to a smaller apartment and bought a 1280x720 beamer for watching those films - so I traded it for a 2.5" 60GB HDD. Most asymmetric trade in terms of bulk and weight I ever did (even beat the swap of an SGI Orign 2000 for a bottle of whisky) 😜
That said, I can't think of anything that would bring me to offer even a fraction of the asking price of that FW900, all the more so as current TFTs vastly outclass it for productivity and as you point out it's worse than 4:3 for retro stuff too.