VOGONS


Reply 60 of 132, by luckybob

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
Jackhead wrote on 2025-05-21, 10:08:
I found another SL49P that would match my first CPU. Will get it in the next days. Till than i tested that dummy cpu that comes […]
Show full quote

I found another SL49P that would match my first CPU. Will get it in the next days. Till than i tested that dummy cpu that comes with my board.
Installed win2k on a SSD over a flashed SIL3114 sata controller. System runs really fast with single core alone.
Not sure its because the 2GB RAM or the 1MB L2, but definitely faster as a Slot1 P3 with W2k.
Here a picture of HWinfo on the mashine. Still not installed the voodoo. I want first the CPU setup finished.
Maybe i found some day a SL4XY pair..

Honestly W2k is an under-rated operating system. its like a lean version of XP.

But the best thing for speed is the sata ssd. The ram also helps, but 2k will fly on anything with >256mb of ram. Even using pentium pro chips, the system feels good with 2K. provided you have the ram. ^.^

I would not worry about TRIM for the SSD - unless you are planning on using this machine every day, its not an issue. You can just keep a backup image of the drive if the worst happens, but honestly its a 1 in a million chance if you are using a quality name brand SSD.

It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with potatoes.

Reply 61 of 132, by Jackhead

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Next step will be sleeving the ATX power adapter. Will try it tomorrow.
First fit test of the voodoo inside. Looks like it was made to be exatly on this board 😀.

The attachment GrfB47tWkAABCsl.jpeg is no longer available
The attachment GrfB4_YWYAAuGE8.jpeg is no longer available
The attachment GrfB5A5WgAA104G.jpeg is no longer available

Dos 6.22: Asus VL/I-486SV2GX4 Rev 2.0 1Mb L2 - A5x86 X5 P75 - 64MB - AHA-2842A VLB - ET4000W32P VLB - CT2230 - GUS ACE - MPU-401AT with YucatanFX
Win98SE: Asus P5K-WS - E8600 @ 4,5GHz - Strange God Voodoo 5 6000 PCI-X - 2GB DDR2 1066 - Audigy 2 ZS

Reply 62 of 132, by chinny22

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

This is shaping up to be one sexy build. Even that rear support bracket looks good.
I also agree Win2k feel's more correct for this era hardware then XP.

On my dual slot 1 I run Win2k. it feels a lot like Win9x and runs the vast majority of games just fine.
I do dual boot with Win98 just for those few games that don't like 2k

Reply 63 of 132, by feipoa

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Was the original problem only that the motherboard's original BIOS was unable to detect both CPUs correctly (SL4XU & SL49P), but they still both worked in W2K at 700 MHz? Was W2K feeling slow before your BIOS upgrade, or only after? Does it still feel slow with just one CPU installed? Does the secondary slot require a terminator card?

Do you have a pair of coppermine based slot 2 Xeons to test, e.g. 1000/133/256K/2.8V, albeit at only 750 MHz?

I will relay some of my experience from when I setup a dual Slot 2 Xeon on a Dell Precision Workstation 610. Some of your issues feel similar to my exerpiences and the end result wasn't all balloons and cheers.

First off, running a pair of SL3CF CPUs worked fine. They are 550/100/2M/2.8V cartridges based on the Tanner core. The problems started when I tried running 700/100/2M or 700/100/1M cartridges (Cascades core). The jumper speed setting on my motherboard only officially went up to 550 MHz, however there are two reserved jumpers which, as it turns out, relate to 600 and 650 MHz.

I am able to run a single 700/100/2M/2.8V SL49R CPU without issue, provided I set the 650 MHz jumper. The CPU only runs with a 6.5x, however, so 650 MHz. If I install both SL49R CPUs, the BIOS screen stays blank. I also tried with a pair of SL49P (700/100/1M), but the screen stayed blank.

If I tried to install a pair of SL3WV (866/133/256k/2.8V) and set the jumper to 650 MHz, the system does power on, unlike with a pair of 700/100 cartridges, however I am displayed an unfortunate error:

Alert! Processor cache size mismatch. Install like processors or one processor and a terminator card. System halted.

However, a single SL3WV (866/133/256k/2.8V) cartridge works just fine. The same conditions manifested when SL4HE (1000/133/256k/2.8V) cartridges were used.

I hope your issue is solely related to differing S-spec parts, however on my system, I vaguely recall testing a pair of PII or PIII Xeons (at 550 MHz or less) with differing S-specs and it was functional.

Plan your life wisely, you'll be dead before you know it.

Reply 64 of 132, by Jackhead

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

The slowdowns come when i plugged in both CPUs. I will get today the matching CPU. Will see if this was really the issue they dont like each other.
The bios update itself changed nothing on that. But it was worth doing it because my board was new with an very old release.
Yes, in my board manual is written that i need to install the dummy if i run single cpu.

Far as i know my board did not support FSB133. And someone correct me if im wrong, but the 256K xeons are just normal PIIIs in xeon package.
Im not really interested to install them. I want Cascades!

For Pentium3 there are no need to set jumper for the Speed (my board dont have any jumper for FSB or Speed).
I can set speed on bios but pretty sure its just for a PII setup.

edit:
got the CPU installed. It has the same CPU ID as the first one and on boot all errors gone.
But system is slow again. So i did a bios reset. After that the errors came back. And i always tryed retest CPU first.

Fan solution for the second CPU:

The attachment PXL_20250522_141024443.jpg is no longer available
The attachment PXL_20250522_141043351.jpg is no longer available

for the Sound an Audigy 2 ZS

Dos 6.22: Asus VL/I-486SV2GX4 Rev 2.0 1Mb L2 - A5x86 X5 P75 - 64MB - AHA-2842A VLB - ET4000W32P VLB - CT2230 - GUS ACE - MPU-401AT with YucatanFX
Win98SE: Asus P5K-WS - E8600 @ 4,5GHz - Strange God Voodoo 5 6000 PCI-X - 2GB DDR2 1066 - Audigy 2 ZS

Reply 65 of 132, by Jackhead

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

I think i know whats going on. Here the first message after a bios reset:

The attachment PXL_20250522_143918357.jpg is no longer available

It disable the cache! When i than switch to bios its shown 256k, but it musst be 1MB.

The attachment PXL_20250522_144117491.jpg is no longer available

But the disabled L2 would be explain the system goes so slow.
Question is why the cache getting disabled when i plug in the second CPU?
Error 8121 is not listed in the manual..

Last edited by Jackhead on 2025-05-22, 15:00. Edited 2 times in total.

Dos 6.22: Asus VL/I-486SV2GX4 Rev 2.0 1Mb L2 - A5x86 X5 P75 - 64MB - AHA-2842A VLB - ET4000W32P VLB - CT2230 - GUS ACE - MPU-401AT with YucatanFX
Win98SE: Asus P5K-WS - E8600 @ 4,5GHz - Strange God Voodoo 5 6000 PCI-X - 2GB DDR2 1066 - Audigy 2 ZS

Reply 66 of 132, by Intel486dx33

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Don’t feel bad. I have a few of the Intel dual processor server motherboards and they are very finicky about hardware.
And bios firmware. Keep at it and good luck. Looks great anyways.
I think Windows 2000 or Linux would be your best bet.

Reply 67 of 132, by Jackhead

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
Intel486dx33 wrote on 2025-05-22, 14:51:

Don’t feel bad. I have a few of the Intel dual processor server motherboards and they are very finicky about hardware.
And bios firmware. Keep at it and good luck. Looks great anyways.
I think Windows 2000 or Linux would be your best bet.

You think downgrade the bios version is a good idea to try out?

Dos 6.22: Asus VL/I-486SV2GX4 Rev 2.0 1Mb L2 - A5x86 X5 P75 - 64MB - AHA-2842A VLB - ET4000W32P VLB - CT2230 - GUS ACE - MPU-401AT with YucatanFX
Win98SE: Asus P5K-WS - E8600 @ 4,5GHz - Strange God Voodoo 5 6000 PCI-X - 2GB DDR2 1066 - Audigy 2 ZS

Reply 68 of 132, by Intel486dx33

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
Jackhead wrote on 2025-05-22, 14:57:
Intel486dx33 wrote on 2025-05-22, 14:51:

Don’t feel bad. I have a few of the Intel dual processor server motherboards and they are very finicky about hardware.
And bios firmware. Keep at it and good luck. Looks great anyways.
I think Windows 2000 or Linux would be your best bet.

You think downgrade the bios version is a good idea to try out?

You might want to read the release notes provided with each bios version to see if it would help with your hardware components.

Reply 69 of 132, by Jackhead

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

atm i think like feipoa say, end is 550MHz dual for the board/bios.

Dos 6.22: Asus VL/I-486SV2GX4 Rev 2.0 1Mb L2 - A5x86 X5 P75 - 64MB - AHA-2842A VLB - ET4000W32P VLB - CT2230 - GUS ACE - MPU-401AT with YucatanFX
Win98SE: Asus P5K-WS - E8600 @ 4,5GHz - Strange God Voodoo 5 6000 PCI-X - 2GB DDR2 1066 - Audigy 2 ZS

Reply 70 of 132, by feipoa

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
Jackhead wrote on 2025-05-22, 21:27:

atm i think like feipoa say, end is 550MHz dual for the board/bios.

Sorry to be the harbinger of disappointment.

I even tried to overclock my 550's to 600 MHz, but they couldn't cope much past booting into DOS. Luckily, you didn't dish out for the 900/100/2M/2.8V chips.

The coppermine-based 1000/133/256K chips will work at 100 MHz, but with the reduced cache, you just as well be running a slot 1 machine. I was only curious if your board would let you go dual with 1000/133/256 chips with L2 enabled.

Plan your life wisely, you'll be dead before you know it.

Reply 71 of 132, by luckybob

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
feipoa wrote on 2025-05-22, 23:29:
Sorry to be the harbinger of disappointment. […]
Show full quote
Jackhead wrote on 2025-05-22, 21:27:

atm i think like feipoa say, end is 550MHz dual for the board/bios.

Sorry to be the harbinger of disappointment.

I even tried to overclock my 550's to 600 MHz, but they couldn't cope much past booting into DOS. Luckily, you didn't dish out for the 900/100/2M/2.8V chips.

The coppermine-based 1000/133/256K chips will work at 100 MHz, but with the reduced cache, you just as well be running a slot 1 machine. I was only curious if your board would let you go dual with 1000/133/256 chips with L2 enabled.

if you can even find those chips... The supply of those unicorns have disappeared like a fart in the wind...

There's no practical reason a 700mhz chip shouldn't work with a bios update. apparently intel never updated it for its own board? I wouldn't give up yet.

It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with potatoes.

Reply 72 of 132, by feipoa

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
luckybob wrote on 2025-05-22, 23:56:

There's no practical reason a 700mhz chip shouldn't work with a bios update. apparently intel never updated it for its own board? I wouldn't give up yet.

Why provide a free BIOS update when you can sell the customer a new motherboard?

Plan your life wisely, you'll be dead before you know it.

Reply 73 of 132, by Jackhead

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

i found something releated to the L2 problems on some releasenotes.
Looks like serval builds try to fix the L2.
There was a microcode update for the 500/550 and the 450.

and :

Bug fix for L2 Cache Reg not set
correctly problem found on NS
corruption

no idea what "NS" means..

C440GX+ BIOS 3.0 Release Notes
Note: BIOS 3.0 must be used with BMC firmware verstion 1.03 (CYMBC13.ZIP).
6/16/1999

*************************************************************************************

BLD Date C440GX+ ECO L440GX+ L440GX+ Production Release
----------------------------------------------------------------------
65 5/27/99 Production Release 3.0
1. Based on BUILD 64
2. Banner roll for P3.0 build 65

64 5/17/99 Release P2.1
1. Based on BUild 59
2. Changes for WIN 2K with 2Gig of memory



63 5/14/99 Beta release for Candidate P3.0
1. added WIN 2K 2Gig fix.
2. Added additional feature for loging
errors on Flash Parameter block
3. DMI Vital Data Protection
4. New Adaptec BIOS
5. Bug fix for L2 Cache Reg not set
correctly problem found on NS
corruption

62 5/14/99 Beta 2.0 release for Candidate P7.0
1. Based on BUILD 60
2. added WIN 2K 2Gig fix.
3. Added additional feature for loging
errors on Flash Parameter block
corruption

61 5/12/99 Release 6.1
1. Based on BUILD 58 does not include DMI fix
2. added WIN 2K 2Gig fix.

60 5/11/99 Beta 1.0 release for Candidate P7.0
1. DMI Vital Data Protection
2. New Adaptec BIOS
3. PEP minor string fix up
4. Bug fix for L2 Cache Reg not set
correctly problem

59 4/29/99 ECO Release P2.0
Same as Build 56 with roll banner for production 2.0

58 4/20/99 Release P6.0
roll banner for production 6.0
57 4/20/99 Beta release for Candidate P6.0
Added new Microcode Patch for C0 673




56 4/13/99 Beta release for Candidate P2.0
1. Added fix for User Bin not being removed from Runtime
memory
Show last 158 lines
                2. Added fix for logging SERR in SEL         
3. Added fix for Type 1,2,3 more robust and
type 6 and type 17 for > 512 Memory fix
4. Added string fix for PEP Black out period
5. Fix PEP string for number of min Black out time
6. Added fixes for the C0 stepping cache initialization


55 4/12/99 Beta release for Candidate P6.0
1. Added fix for clocking 550Mhz processor
2. Added fix for logging SERR in SEL
3. Added fix for Type 1,2,3 more robust and
type 6 and type 17 for > 512 Memory fix
4. Added string fix for PEP Black out period
5. Added fixes for the C0 stepping cache initialization




54 3/17/99 C440GX+ ECO PEP Beta release
PEP Feature added

53 3/11/99 Production Release L440GX+ P5.0

52 3/04/99 PRoduction Release C440GX+ P1.0
1. Banner roll for Production Release 1.0
2. Buffer strength change from L440GX+

51 3/02/99 N/A L440GX+ ECO Slot 1 related changes
50 3/01/99 Bad Build


49 2/26/99 RC3 C440GX+ for P1.0
1. Fix for SMBIOS DMI data where the Cache
info is switched per processor
fixed int 15 DA92
2. Reverse the order of the slot for the
error logging on DIMM
3. Banner change from L/C to C
4. IDE performance changes
5. Fix for First Time Boot
6. P6 Microcode update for CPUID 673
7. Fix for EMP Access mode not saved when EMP password
entered
8. No PEP features in Setup


48 2/22/99 RC Beta for C440GX+ ECO PEP
1 added prechare for the DEC bridge
for 66Mhz PCI cards
2 Fix for the PCI IRQ APIC routing table.
3 fix for SMBIOS DMI data where the
cache infor is switched per
processor
4 Fix PEP Send Test Page feature
was not sending pages
5 Enabled PEP features
47 2/16/99 Production Release 4.0
46 2/12/99 RC 5 - Trans for Japanese PSN
45 2/11/99 RC 1 for P5.0 L440GX+ ECO
1. Enabled PEP features
2. Reverse the order of the
slot for the error logging
on DIMM
3. Added translations for
the PSN setup
44 2/11/99 RC 4 -Translations for PSN Fix
43 2/11/99 RC 3 - Reverse the order of the
slot for the error logging on DIMM
42 2/11/99 C440GX+ RC2 for P1.0
1. Added PIIX4 precharging code to
avoid long IDE drive detection
2. Change to BIOS ID to C440GX
3. No PEP features
41 2/09/99 RC 2 -Added PIIX4 precharging code
to avoid long IDE drive detection
40 2/09/99 RC 1-
1 Added processor serial number
PSN en/disable option to Setup.
2 DMI type 6 and type 17 handler bug
Correctly interpret size word
returned by chipset

39 2/07/99 C440GX+ RC1 for P1.0
1 added feature for displaying locked
processors in setup.
2 Fix for DMI Cache string on C440GX+.
3 Fix for CPU step and cache INFO in setup
4 Added bit for locked processors in setup
and added Post CPU speed for locked
processors in setup
5 Added new string and node for CPU speed at post
6 Added processor serial number PSN en/disable
option to Setup.
7 DMI type 6 and type 17 handler bug
Correctly interpret size word returned
by chipset
8 Added work a round to check if using unbuffered
Dimms and double sided memory in >2 slots .
Buffer strength optimization
9 No PEP features
38 2/02/99 Roll Banner for Production Release 3.0
37 1/29/99 C440GX+ Beta for P1.0
1. set the Piix4 IDE for optimal
values
2. Fix the quiet boot setup option for
if there is a logo present.
3. Added support for handling multiple
slots (1,2) and multiple CPU
types
4. Added DMI pentium III and Pentium II
strings. New DMI structures were added
5. Fix for the HSBP information sometimes
not showing up
6. No PEP features

36 1/27/99 L440GX+ ECO
1. Fix for Slot 1 and Slot 2 CPU updates

35 1/20/99 Production Release 2.0
1. Fix for NT4.0 Greater than 1 gig
memory (wrong Microcode)
2. Pentium III string change and
copyright
34 1/19/99 L440GX+ ECO/ C440GX+ Beta for P1.0
1. Fix DMI processor swap for Proc 1
and Proc 2 on C440GX+.
2. Fix for S1 with L440GX+ from previous
S1 removeal on C440GX+
3. Fix for CPU speed on setup menu.
Remove for C440GX+
4. No PEP features

33 1/15/99 L440GX+ ECO /C440GX+ Beta P1.0
Fix build error from Build 32
32 1/15/99 Do not USE - L440GX+ ECO /C440GX+ Beta P1.0
1. Pentium III string added
and change Copyright 1999
2. No PEP features
31 1/14/99 L440GX+ ECO /C440GX+ Beta P1.0
1. change copyright year 1999
2. Pentium(R) III
Xeon(TM) or Pentium(R) II Xeon(TM)
swap DMI processor information for proc
3. Remove S1 sleep state if C440GX+
4. Set devices behind bridge
5. Hide speed control in setup on C440GX+
since this is done in FW
6. Int15h-DA20, func 9Ch to exit if C440GX+
platform detected.
7. No PEP features

30 1/05/99 L440GX+ ECO PEP
Based on Production 1.0 LW
Added PEP features
29 12/18/99 Production Release 1.0 LW

Dos 6.22: Asus VL/I-486SV2GX4 Rev 2.0 1Mb L2 - A5x86 X5 P75 - 64MB - AHA-2842A VLB - ET4000W32P VLB - CT2230 - GUS ACE - MPU-401AT with YucatanFX
Win98SE: Asus P5K-WS - E8600 @ 4,5GHz - Strange God Voodoo 5 6000 PCI-X - 2GB DDR2 1066 - Audigy 2 ZS

Reply 74 of 132, by feipoa

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Does anyone know how a Cascades 700/100/2M differs from a Tanner 550/100/2M, aside from the smaller manufacturing process of 0.18 um vs. 0.25 um?

I assumed that the Tanner core was largely a Katmai with a lot more cache at full speed, but I'm not able to place the Cascades. Was the Cascades a Coppermine with a lot more cache?

Plan your life wisely, you'll be dead before you know it.

Reply 75 of 132, by Jackhead

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

I assume cascades is coppermine with add cache, yes.

tryed some more tests.
With both CPUs installed bootet into win2k HWinfo show no L2 on second CPU.
That would equal with the first bios error that L2 is deactivated when second CPU is installed.
System is really slow but works absolute fine.

Dos 6.22: Asus VL/I-486SV2GX4 Rev 2.0 1Mb L2 - A5x86 X5 P75 - 64MB - AHA-2842A VLB - ET4000W32P VLB - CT2230 - GUS ACE - MPU-401AT with YucatanFX
Win98SE: Asus P5K-WS - E8600 @ 4,5GHz - Strange God Voodoo 5 6000 PCI-X - 2GB DDR2 1066 - Audigy 2 ZS

Reply 76 of 132, by feipoa

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
Jackhead wrote on 2025-05-23, 11:27:

With both CPUs installed bootet into win2k HWinfo show no L2 on second CPU.
That would equal with the first bios error that L2 is deactivated when second CPU is installed.
System is really slow but works absolute fine.

Why is the system really slow if only the secondary CPU has its cache disabled? If you set the affinity to 0 instead of 0,1 does it speed up? Or do you think the slow speed is due to some mutual hangup between CPU 1 and CPU2 cache as the system tries to arbitrate?

Plan your life wisely, you'll be dead before you know it.

Reply 77 of 132, by Jackhead

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

i definitely think its a bios/microcode problem.
With one cascades CPU it still did the L2 bios Reg not correctly, but windows dont care.
In Dual mode now way.
I also tryed switching win from ACPI to MPS and used MPS 1.1 or 1.4 in the bios.

I would say running the board with one cascades 900MHz and would be better as 2x 550 ?
Because i see no other options.

Dos 6.22: Asus VL/I-486SV2GX4 Rev 2.0 1Mb L2 - A5x86 X5 P75 - 64MB - AHA-2842A VLB - ET4000W32P VLB - CT2230 - GUS ACE - MPU-401AT with YucatanFX
Win98SE: Asus P5K-WS - E8600 @ 4,5GHz - Strange God Voodoo 5 6000 PCI-X - 2GB DDR2 1066 - Audigy 2 ZS

Reply 78 of 132, by luckybob

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

The 900mhz chips are unobtanium... sadly. I haven't seen a hit on my ebay saved searches in years.

It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with potatoes.

Reply 79 of 132, by feipoa

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

There's a small probability that the 1000/133/256K cascades will work in dual, but they are 7.5x only, so 750 MHz. 550 MHz with 2M is more interesting.

I remember seeing one 900/2M/2.8V five years ago on eBay. I thought I bought it, but when I looked in my box of Xeons, it wasn't there. I think your best bet to obtain one is to make a trade deal with a CPU collector.

Plan your life wisely, you'll be dead before you know it.