Reply 520 of 523, by pete8475
- Rank
- Oldbie
Further P4 overclocking/testing has resulted in a final configuration of 4.8GHZ and a 7900GS graphics card.
I'm pretty happy with these results!
2000 - 27346
2001 - 27866
2003 - 15986
Further P4 overclocking/testing has resulted in a final configuration of 4.8GHZ and a 7900GS graphics card.
I'm pretty happy with these results!
2000 - 27346
2001 - 27866
2003 - 15986
Crazy to think that from 65nm to 10nm barely any clock speed was gained
I built:
Convert old ASUS ASC boardviews to KICAD PCB!
Re: A comprehensive guide to install and play MechWarrior 2 on new versions on Windows.
Dos+Windows 3.11+tcp+vbe_svga auto-install iso template
Script to backup Win9x\ME drivers from a working install
Re: The thing no one asked for: KICAD 440bx reference schematic
myne wrote on 2025-09-12, 01:24:Crazy to think that from 65nm to 10nm barely any clock speed was gained
The computational power is MUCH more though.
pete8475 wrote on 2025-09-12, 10:37:myne wrote on 2025-09-12, 01:24:Crazy to think that from 65nm to 10nm barely any clock speed was gained
The computational power is MUCH more though.
Even in the last 5-7 years the work achieved at the same clock speed for a given core on a current gen CPU is several times that of a top end CPU of, say, 2017. I'd rather have a current gen desktop CPU of 2024-2025 than a Xeon from 2017.
Clock speeds haven't increased massively, but you're right; tick-for-tick real world performance most definitely has. And more cores for the same price - what's not to like?
My collection database and technical wiki:
https://www.target-earth.net