VOGONS


Reply 200 of 204, by FullYes

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
RetroPCCupboard wrote on Yesterday, 21:31:

I just run it at the speed it auto detected. The CPU is very overpowered for Win98. It has been rock solid.

Interesting! Yeah it’s crazy to even have such a setup for win98. But it is one of the reasons why some of us are here 😬

I have been collecting info about running 266/1066MHz FSB CPUs on these boards. I think you’re the first person I’ve seen say they’ve had absolutely no trouble with one. I absolutely do not need anything better than an a 200/800MHz FSB e5800 (3.2GHz) CPU in this board, they are about £7 on eBay. But where is the fun in doing just that?!

Here are some mental notes I’ve made so far

A lot of people comment that 266/1066 FSB CPUs aren’t as stable as 200/800 as 266 is purely an overclocked setting.

Also a 200Mhz CPU can’t be pushed to run at 266MHz (with a lower multiplier) in software - instead you have to pin mod the chip to force the board to detect the CPU as a 266 one. This then properly engages the right straps/ dividers to run 266 - this is kind of pointless anyway as 266 CPUs are widely available now and cheap.

The 266 FSB CPUs also end up with underclocked RAM by default. Although I saw a post claiming that they had their board running at 250MHz FSB 1:1 RAM, though not sure how they did this with the FSB restraints this board seems to have.

I saw a review of a different board with the same chipset suggest that 266 FSB 1:1 is possible if you have good enough RAM

Someone else said that CPUS with 1/2 multipliers can cause problems eg core2duo E7600 (11.5), Pentium E6800 (12.5)

I bought literally for pennies today an E7500. It’s the same FSB x multi as the X6800 (266x11) to try out on it. I will wait to see what CPU it comes with before I spend any more!

Also in other news, time to sell some stuff. Got way too much Athlon stuff now. And I don’t need both a k6-3 and a k6-3+. I’m not a YouTuber 😂

System 1: K6-3+ 600MHz! MS-5158 (430TX), Voodoo3 2000, AWE64 (Dos/95-early 98)
System 2: Athlon XP-M 2800+ SL-75KAV (KT133A) FX5900XT, Audigy 2ZS (late 98/Dos backup)
System 3: TBA!
System 4: i7-2600k, P8P67-M, GTX 460 (XP)

Reply 202 of 204, by FullYes

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

I cannot confirm yet but I’m led to believe it’s all down to the bios version. The last iteration of the bios for the R2.0 is the same as r3.0? It may not officially supported but it still works? This is based on others’ experiences on here

System 1: K6-3+ 600MHz! MS-5158 (430TX), Voodoo3 2000, AWE64 (Dos/95-early 98)
System 2: Athlon XP-M 2800+ SL-75KAV (KT133A) FX5900XT, Audigy 2ZS (late 98/Dos backup)
System 3: TBA!
System 4: i7-2600k, P8P67-M, GTX 460 (XP)

Reply 203 of 204, by RetroPCCupboard

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
FullYes wrote on Today, 11:56:

I cannot confirm yet but I’m led to believe it’s all down to the bios version. The last iteration of the bios for the R2.0 is the same as r3.0? It may not officially supported but it still works? This is based on others’ experiences on here

Maybe. My R2 board is dead. So I can't try

Reply 204 of 204, by FullYes

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

I will soon find out. Should be here tomorrow along with (maybe) the e7500

System 1: K6-3+ 600MHz! MS-5158 (430TX), Voodoo3 2000, AWE64 (Dos/95-early 98)
System 2: Athlon XP-M 2800+ SL-75KAV (KT133A) FX5900XT, Audigy 2ZS (late 98/Dos backup)
System 3: TBA!
System 4: i7-2600k, P8P67-M, GTX 460 (XP)